GleuteusMax

Oh, i have a lot of respect for this nick but i didn´t played many hands against you

Btw.: I forgot StolenMoments and Drusselmhore.
But i didn´t saw Drusselmhore last days.

haha dont worry i know im a tag fish

good list scipio. thats most of the regs i try to avoid.

gluet, you are good. you dont play as aggressive as most of the regs, but i think you hand read v well.

scipio, whats your sn?

See u all at the tables around 7am ur time!!!

hah i love the way every1 is biggin every1 up after the recent posts about not posting leaks but i need a new site wtf man, just looked at the rooms to see if could play for a couple of hours sas a break from all my revision.. and 1 FISH wT F!!!!!? i need to move to PS, they have started puttin up lotsa adverts around UK on billboards and on TV.. maybe a major influx of fishies soon!?

Unreal how bad regulars are on this site, they just adapt so badly

acesplz is a excellent excellent player, i find mattys nitty but very good

awful regulars: Ilovea, badcarplayer

just played ken******d very very impressed with is game

lol 2easy is high/just had some sex... why else he not berating ppl!? lol

wow i havnt played with mattmys in a while, but last time i played him he was a very leaky nit.

Humpf is 1 of the only regs i respect, but he is a bit of a *, mattmys is decent enough but has some leaks!!

Humpf is 1 of the only regs i respect, but he is a bit of a *, mattmys is decent enough but has some leaks!! But in general u regs r pretty poor!!!

mattmys has improved quite a bit over the last few months i think, good player.


Wantareceipt is the most uncreative predictable nitty player at 10/20+.

"Blacky00"
So i took the last place of my list ^^
Hopefully that this is not too haughtily.

It helps me to find out who the best players are. For example somebody said that humpf is a great player and i didn´t recognised it.
I want to know which players are worth messing around.

Why complain so much, Carabba is spewing around enough for everybody on ipoker.

Last days the games have become bit better i think.. many holiday donks with to much cash.

I miss FrancisLanal and urfullofit on that list, those are both the players i hate sitting with. What are ur thoughts on them?

fancislanal seems to play very well, urefullofit on the hand HAHAHAHAHA

Who quit who when 4 tabling HU last week, just as i got the momentum and the stacks you disappeared? You disguise it well but you are EASILY the biggest NIT on ipoker and there are NITS Everywhere. I am in a nasty downswing atm though and had a bad tilt patch at 10-20 where i played horribly.

swear on my mothers head my internet disconnected trust me i wouldnt even quit u if my apartement was on fire

im a nit cause im not a spew monkey like you? im by far the biggest winner of all times on ipokernetwork. guess being a nit isnt that bad afterall

lol

yea lol @ ppl who claim nits suk, generally those same ppl are the loosing/marginal breakeven donks who love to mega spew.

You all seem to forget sometimes that nits make money in a little more variance free way.. i think that has merit to loosing some +EV due to the extreme nittyness...

Not like there is a bunch of CT standard players to take advantage of us anyways, you guys just bluff ur chips at us most of the time so why change... i love the way ppl raise me when i donk into them from the blinds on dry flops with air. and then proceed to donk off with a turnd top pair when i flat the RR on the flop... like the thinking "he has small pair, probe betting to see where he is at, i will riase to find out/ get him to fold". then they hit their K/A on turn and decide i dont have **** and will stack off with underpair...just LOL.

Being a NIT = Awsome

/Rant

i played lolololol bad today

You do come off as a wanker (justified I guess if you really are the biggest winner on iPoker) but I agree with the sentiment here.

Reading these threads can't help but wonder at how meaningful all these opinions on other players are. For everyone who thinks one player is great, it seems another person thinks they suck and vice versa. Unless you have a huge sample on someone, how justified are these opinions really? I know from my own experience how easy it is to form opinions on people based on the way you saw them play one hand or session, but have to question how much that really counts for given how much your own play can vary...