Quote:
Originally Posted by TimStone
Nice try boss...
Make it 6 and we can discuss numbers
Not sure how you can deny that 4 is extremely difficult....
2, maybe 3 guys can make a legitimate claim to have beaten 500nlz for >4bb last year over a statistically relevant sample (with say a 70% confidence interval, which really isn't much). Amongst the higher volume players that number falls to 0, with very few even able to state with certainty that they're winning pre-rakeback.
it's easy for someone to win at 4evbb for 100k hands given say a 500k hand sample - variance exists. But to predict 4evbb in the next 100k hands ahead of time and then execute that, that's far more difficult, especially given the rake and reg:fish ratio of 500z.