Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
"Freeeeeeeeeeedommmm!!!!" "Freeeeeeeeeeedommmm!!!!"

10-18-2014 , 08:16 PM
Jiggs is far from the worst poster ever and seems to have cooled off, but he sure as **** deserved the perma he caught. Let him back imo with a short leash and ban him when he steps out of line quickly again. Let him try to come back 2 years later.
10-18-2014 , 08:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Jiggs is far from the worst poster ever and seems to have cooled off, but he sure as **** deserved the perma he caught. Let him back imo with a short leash and ban him when he steps out of line quickly again. Let him try to come back 2 years later.
Thanks? I guess.

But, "deserved?" ... Please define "steps out of line" in your rather hypocritical criteria, if you would?

Behavior-wise, you don't have a leg to stand on, as you're one of the worst contributors in the forum (THE worst, by last count)

Subject material? Tell me where in the ToS it says you can't discuss limits to growth.
10-18-2014 , 08:32 PM
Jiggs should be allowed to post, he sucks about the same as most regular politards, no real reason to ban.
10-18-2014 , 08:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggsCasey
Thanks? I guess.

But, "deserved?" ... Please define "steps out of line" in your rather hypocritical criteria, if you would?

Behavior-wise, you don't have a leg to stand on, as you're one of the worst contributors in the forum (THE worst, by last count)

Subject material? Tell me where in the ToS it says you can't discuss limits to growth.
Oh bull**** jiggs. You were a pathetic idiot spamming every thread with peak oil ******ation while repeatedly violating various name calling rules. If you're not willing to own up to why you were banned then you shouldn't be let back in.

Needless to say, I don't agree with or care about your evaluation of my posting. Regardless, my behavior is not a reason for your re-instatement.
10-18-2014 , 09:00 PM
So you're unwilling to qualify what "step out of line" means, in your goofy view. Got it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Oh bull**** jiggs. You were a pathetic idiot spamming every thread with peak oil ******ation
None of it is ******ed, and I'd say closer to maybe 30% of the threads I chose to enter, and always relevant. But don't let your wild exaggeration stop you. You always were prone to amusing drama.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
while repeatedly violating various name calling rules.
Not in the same stratosphere as you though, huh worst poster?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
If you're not willing to own up to why you were banned then you shouldn't be let back in.
I just owned up to it in the original post. Less grunching, more reading.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Needless to say, I don't agree with or care about your evaluation of my posting.
Yes, you seem to go to great lengths in letting us all know how much you "don't care" over and over again ever since you were voted the forums absolute worst.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Regardless, my behavior is not a reason for your re-instatement.
No, it's just a reason for you to probably not point any fingers without looking like a complete hypocrite.
10-18-2014 , 09:03 PM
Jiggs you most certainly did not own up to why you were banned. You're still living in a world of delusion, which seems standard for a 911 truther and peak oil dude.
10-18-2014 , 09:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggsCasey
Subject material? Tell me where in the ToS it says you can't discuss limits to growth.
Pretty hard to miss

10-18-2014 , 09:33 PM
Did a double take, gregorio goat.
10-18-2014 , 09:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
Jiggs you most certainly did not own up to why you were banned. You're still living in a world of delusion, which seems standard for a 911 truther and peak oil dude.
Pretty sure in the OP it agrees I was banned for "behavior" and repeated acknowledgement of net energy decline. You're still unable to actually read, which seems standard for the forum's absolute worst poster, as voted by his peers.
10-18-2014 , 09:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregorio
Pretty hard to miss

*doctored image*
clever troll will troll...
10-18-2014 , 09:46 PM
GTFO with your conspiracy theories. Other than the arrow and box I added, that image was not doctored.
10-18-2014 , 09:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Omar Comin
Did a double take, gregorio goat.

me too, goat for sure

edit: and LOOOL at the above
10-18-2014 , 09:55 PM
Normally I wouldn't want to see a guy banned just for being an uninformed conspiracy nut, but the level at which Jiggs Casey sucks the intelligence and reason out of every discussion he's a part of warrants special consideration.

I pledge to surrender this account forever in exchange for a permanent ban-on-site status for Jiggs Casey. My new account won't be Gonso-something either, I'll take on an unrelated name and avatar and all. Want a couple weeks ban too? I'll do it.

Vote to ban. **** Jiggs Casey.
10-18-2014 , 10:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Turns out this isn't true.
Deuces isn't allowed to post either any more?
10-18-2014 , 10:02 PM
And to make sure I'm extra, extra clear, I'm asking for a full on site ban not just from one area and not temporarily. I'm willing to negotiate if he could be forever banned to one particular thread, located in the forum of my choosing. What else do you want I'll work with you
10-18-2014 , 10:32 PM
Could you throw in some Skype guitar lessons for me with the ban Jiggs package?
10-18-2014 , 11:07 PM
JIIIIIIGGGGGSSSSSSS,

Why don't you link us to some of your recent work in UNCHAINED! to show ATF why you should be unbanned.
10-18-2014 , 11:37 PM
Dont Condemn Jiggs!



Free Jiggs!
10-18-2014 , 11:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggsCasey
Here's the poster who created the lol thread asking for my input on his surface-level understanding of world oil price decline. I had posted in the economics forum all year until Wookie arbitrarily decided I wasn't allowed in there either. ... You know, not because I did anything wrong, but because he hates my message and arbitrarily extended the politics ban to econ as well. Not sure why he allowed me to post in economics for 15 months before, but I presume it had to do with reminding the forum that the recovery continues to stall due to historically high oil price. Again.
I'm the one with the surface level understanding?? It's what Econ 101 had been predicting this entire time.

Price goes up. Demand falls, supply increases. Peak oil in the U.S turns out to not be true, because technological advances and the profit incentive enable suppliers to extract oil from fields they had not been able too before.

I stated as much years ago. You didn't listen then, you won't listen now.
10-19-2014 , 12:01 AM
"Freeeeeeeeeeedommmm!!!!"

Ok here you go:


10-19-2014 , 12:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by niss
Deuces isn't allowed to post either any more?
To borrow from Hans Gruber, Deuces will not be joining us for the rest of his life.
10-19-2014 , 12:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by RowCoach
I'm the one with the surface level understanding?? It's what Econ 101 had been predicting this entire time.

Price goes up. Demand falls, supply increases.
Except, supply isn't really increasing, no matter how much your heroes change the defintion of oil to fit your soft science narrative. This is well documented, you might wanna do a bit more reading.

Your thread is begging for response, because you routinely don't know what you're talking about. But then, you won't read any of the abundant mainstream links I would provide tossing your dumb rationale in the toilet. Just like last time you entered the ring and got shut down.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RowCoach
Peak oil in the U.S turns out to not be true, because technological advances and the profit incentive enable suppliers to extract oil from fields they had not been able too before.
LOL... then why is foreign investment drying up, and oil majors dumping capital expenditures to the tune of 15-40%?

The tech advances you troll about are enormously expensive and ONLY supported by ponzi scheme investment fraud. Meanwhile, the decline rate of those frack wells are clifflike. You gotta keep building exponentially more and more $5-10 million wells just to keep standing in place. Go you have ANY grasp of logistical limits?

See, the world can't afford $100 oil. And oil producers need oil closer to $125-$150... that's a real problem for your perpetual "no problem" outlook on the world.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RowCoach
I stated as much years ago. You didn't listen then, you won't listen now.
It's not that I wouldn't listen. It's that you were dead wrong, and don't have the mental capacity to understand what's being argued. To review: Cheap energy dictates to the markets you perpetually worship. Not the other way around.

Without cheap energy, the engine seizes up. We're seeing that to increasing degree with each passing month. And now that cash injection is finally over, and dumb investment has wised up, it's just a matter of time.

You geniuses were chirping the same pretentious "loljiggs" nonsense in late 2008 when the price plunged over a hundred dollars. And I was there to remind you Pollyannas that it would go right back up in short order. And it did.

Just stop posting, or man up and take it to UC where you're not protected by mods who won't let me educate you.

Last edited by JiggsCasey; 10-19-2014 at 12:29 AM.
10-19-2014 , 12:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
To borrow from Hans Gruber, Deuces will not be joining us for the rest of his life.
Is that because you shot him in the face, too?
10-19-2014 , 12:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gonzirra
Normally I wouldn't want to see a guy banned just for being an uninformed conspiracy nut, but the level at which Jiggs Casey sucks the intelligence and reason out of every discussion he's a part of warrants special consideration.

I pledge to surrender this account forever in exchange for a permanent ban-on-site status for Jiggs Casey. My new account won't be Gonso-something either, I'll take on an unrelated name and avatar and all. Want a couple weeks ban too? I'll do it.

Vote to ban. **** Jiggs Casey.
I'm sorry. I don't know who you are. I'm also sorry you seem to be in the minority in this thread.

There is no conspiracy about historically high oil prices. But whatever you need to tell yourself.
10-19-2014 , 12:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
To borrow from Hans Gruber, Deuces will not be joining us for the rest of his life.
That cuts Gamblor's posting by about 30% or so. I'll miss the guy, tho.

      
m