Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space

02-20-2017 , 07:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LetsGambool
Just dropped in here because I read on an outside poker book website that twoplustwo was supporting questionable sexual consent content and wanted to see what the fuss was about. Should have guessed who would be involved. Bang up job chez, you'll get twoplustwo blocked as a hate site yet.
That's been going on for years, though?

Quote:
Originally Posted by flipya4dinna
If she's ****ing him for money I only think it fair half of 2+2 gets a go.
Little gems like this can be found all over the site. Its not great :/
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-20-2017 , 07:52 PM
What's impressively new is posters getting very upset with a mod who actually doesn't allow it.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-20-2017 , 07:54 PM
LMAO, you haven't done anything but make a green announcement. Have you gone back and pruned Wil's offensive posts?
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-20-2017 , 09:00 PM
Chez, you're every bit the problem Wil is.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-20-2017 , 09:04 PM
You may think so. I think it's good to have a forum where racist, homophobic, paedophile supporting posts, etc etc aren't acceptable.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-20-2017 , 09:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
How many years of posting does a poster have to have under their belt before they're allowed to advocate ****ing dogs? I am asking for a friend.
LirvA set the precedent. It's not as many as you might think.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-20-2017 , 09:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
You may think so. I think it's good to have a forum where racist, homophobic, paedophile supporting posts, etc etc aren't acceptable.
Yes, and it's nice that most of the people who frequent unchained aren't allowed there. Politics alpha is a nice place, unlike the cesspool you've cultivated and continue to lie about every day.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-20-2017 , 09:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
Chez, you're every bit the problem Wil is.
Chez is a much bigger cancer on this forum and planet than wil is.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-20-2017 , 09:17 PM
Chez is no different than Trump: just lie constantly and let your deplorable goons back you up.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-20-2017 , 10:45 PM
i guess now is the time i need to ask if there are people who approve of chezlaw's methods.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-20-2017 , 11:17 PM
It would help Chez's case if he had someone co-mod'ing that place within and the two had to agree to what threads can and cannot be changed.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-21-2017 , 05:08 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat Sklansky
i guess now is the time i need to ask if there are people who approve of chezlaw's methods.
I've been reading this forum since I got curious about WTF the whole Bruce thing was, but I don't post here often. Chez is the first active mod who is actually trying to be fair to everyone. The people criticizing him are the guys who are used to just smearing everyone they dislike.

Just one man's opinion. Good job chez. I don't know how you put up with this crap.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-21-2017 , 09:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
How many years of posting does a poster have to have under their belt before they're allowed to advocate ****ing dogs? I am asking for a friend.
Your pony is slow, having missed TS's 'seminal' work on the subject.
Maybe leave your pony alone for a while to recover?
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-21-2017 , 09:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
You may think so. I think it's good to have a forum where racist, homophobic, paedophile supporting posts, etc etc aren't acceptable.
If you want to make it clear that people aren't to post these things, you need to do more than tut tut them.

The way things stand under your modship people feel free to post unsupported anti-immigrant and pro paedophile views until a groundswell of opinion has welled up, often taking a day or so, the posts are finally edited and the offender told he's a naughty boy.

Rinse/repeat

This forum's becoming a vile cesspit.

Last edited by jalfrezi; 02-21-2017 at 09:10 AM.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-21-2017 , 09:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
If you want to make it clear that people aren't to post these things, you need to do more than tut tut them.

The way things stand under your modship people feel free to post unsupported anti-immigrant and pro paedophile views until a groundswell of opinion has welled up, often taking a day or so, the posts are finally edited and the offender told he's a naughty boy.

Rinse/repeat

This forums becoming a vile cesspit.
That's an unfair assessment of chez's modding. Usually the pro-hate speech posts aren't edited and the people who complain about them get warnings.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-21-2017 , 09:16 AM
I want to make absolutely clear that chez repeatedly has dodged me asking whether any of the actual posts made prior to the rule counted as defending pedophilia.

Quote:
I think it's good to have a forum where racist, homophobic, paedophile supporting posts, etc etc aren't acceptable.
And like, drawing a little connection from chez's well known views on racism and homopobia...

I think he's created this rule as a rhetorical device to shut down people criticizing him, but the reason he didn't do anything to wil is because CHEZ DOESN'T THINK WIL'S POSTS WERE OBJECTIONABLE. Like, that's a natural development of chez's views on all this ****. He says he doesn't approve of racism, but then defines racism to be essentially non-existent. Not a surprise he's pulling the same **** here.




It's such a wonderful little microcosm of the larger problems on the right wing.

Mat modded chezlaw to mollify the white supremacists, but whoops, it never stops there. So now we have to decide if hating them damn smug libtard SJWs is enough to counterbalance kid diddling.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-21-2017 , 09:32 AM
No, chez is a Dr Melfi figure. His forum is a safe space where bigots can learn about socially acceptable ways to express bigotry with the training wheels on. If they screw up, no biggie, Dr Chez swoops in with a stern paternal lecture in green, explaining the mistake they made. Quick timeout and it's back to learning.

The notion that Wil wouldn't catch a perma ban (or even a temp ban!) for linking a gay hate site claiming that a quarter of gay men have had more than a thousand sex partners in service of an argument that gay people view pedophilia different because all they do is **** is appalling but completely illuminating about the nature of the project.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-21-2017 , 09:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by frommagio
I've been reading this forum since I got curious about WTF the whole Bruce thing was, but I don't post here often. Chez is the first active mod who is actually trying to be fair to everyone.
I said the same thing back when this was true. It is clearly no longer true.

Quote:
The people criticizing him are the guys who are used to just smearing everyone they dislike.
I understand that this is how you feel, that people are smearing you if they disagree with you, but that's just not how it works.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-21-2017 , 10:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by frommagio
I've been reading this forum since I got curious about WTF the whole Bruce thing was, but I don't post here often. Chez is the first active mod who is actually trying to be fair to everyone. The people criticizing him are the guys who are used to just smearing everyone they dislike.

Just one man's opinion. Good job chez. I don't know how you put up with this crap.
"Everyone" being Foldn, mongo, Wil, marn and anyone else who says conservative things.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-21-2017 , 10:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalfrezi
If you want to make it clear that people aren't to post these things, you need to do more than tut tut them.

The way things stand under your modship people feel free to post unsupported anti-immigrant and pro paedophile views until a groundswell of opinion has welled up, often taking a day or so, the posts are finally edited and the offender told he's a naughty boy.

Rinse/repeat

This forum's becoming a vile cesspit.
It's very rare any of the posts you are talking about are reported, when they are they are addressed very quickly. You reported your first one recently and it was addressed, many report nothing.

Try reporting more. Posters are getting a lot more than tut tut.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-21-2017 , 10:14 AM
The forum is low volume, you should be on top of all of the threads and reading most of the posts, that's your damn jerb.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-21-2017 , 10:17 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
It's very rare any of the posts you are talking about are reported
That's a clear sign that the community has zero faith in the moderator. Nobody reports anything because we all know you'll do jack **** about people who post hate speech.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-21-2017 , 10:17 AM
Is that a defense of those who complain so much not making the tiny effort to report the posts they object to?
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-21-2017 , 10:21 AM
You really aren't in a position to complain about the level of effort people are putting into that forum Chez.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-21-2017 , 10:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
That's a clear sign that the community has zero faith in the moderator. Nobody reports anything because we all know you'll do jack **** about people who post hate speech.
If people here were complaining that they reported hateful posts and nothing was done then that might be plausible

Instead it seems far more like frommagio is correct
Quote:
The people criticizing him are the guys who are used to just smearing everyone they dislike.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote

      
m