Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space

02-09-2017 , 12:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
That's simply untrue.

Somehow you've managed to get very upset about the decision to ban using 'gay' as an insult.
That's not true.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-09-2017 , 12:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
You were both directing posts at each other that were unacceptable in that thread. You were both told to take it to an appropriate thread.
This is simply untrue. Show me which post in this exchange is a personal attack against Wil.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
I would absolutely bet on a govt false flag terrorist attack at this point. I have never went conspiritard before either. but this is certainly greater than 5050 given bannons involvement.
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
This is the definition of conspiritard, isn't it?

What next? Bush did 9/11? Come on dude.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
Can you go a day without making a personal attack?
Quote:
Originally Posted by wil318466
It wasn't a personal attack. HE called it "conspiritard". I don't even use that word. Stop being such a touchy little bitch. There wasn't anything close to a personal attack in what I said.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
Not even one day. Pathetic. So much for the whole "I only attack people who attack me bull****."
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
Wil and Kerowo, please keep your on-going argument out of the content threads please. And don't bring it to the !!! moderation thread either. Thanks.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
If wil attacks me I will respond in whatever thread he attacks me in. And WTF this isn't a warning for wil using personal attacks in this thread this is some bull**** about wil continuing to blame me for his inability to behave. BOOOOOOOOO! Once again, Wil gets preferential treatment because he is one of your sycophants. SAD!
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
Both of you were warned.

This is a final warning for you to report posts and/or bring them to a moderation thread rather than trying to address them yourself within a content thread.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-09-2017 , 12:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noodle Wazlib
That's not true.
For the record and because I don't want anyone to get the wrong impression - there's no doubt that you agree with banning homophobic insults and were one of the few people (along with me) arguing the case ages ago.

I don't think I can do anything about your problems with me.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-09-2017 , 12:20 AM
Instead of constantly changing just his name, Noodle should try changing his personality. Might make things so easier.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-09-2017 , 01:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
For the record and because I don't want anyone to get the wrong impression - there's no doubt that you agree with banning homophobic insults and were one of the few people (along with me) arguing the case ages ago.

I don't think I can do anything about your problems with me.
Sure you can. Don't arbitrarily enforce rules. Enforce them equally across the board. If you'll recall, while you were doing that briefly I actually praised you for doing so. Since you have changed your behavior, I am criticizing your new behavior. Has nothing to do with you as a person.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-09-2017 , 03:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noodle Wazlib
Sure you can. Don't arbitrarily enforce rules. Enforce them equally across the board. If you'll recall, while you were doing that briefly I actually praised you for doing so. Since you have changed your behavior, I am criticizing your new behavior. Has nothing to do with you as a person.
I don't arbitrarily enforce rules and I enforce them across the board. My 'new' behavior was to ban the use of 'gay' as an insult. Somehow this has upset you and that is bizarre as it's something you agree with.

I'd also ask you to report misogynistic posts if you see them.

Last edited by chezlaw; 02-09-2017 at 03:15 AM.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-09-2017 , 08:48 AM
As long as it's still okay for me to call LowKey a bitch, I'm okay with the totally arbitrary rules.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-09-2017 , 10:25 AM
This thread is only half as AIDSy as the recent POG thread. Y'all need to step up your game.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-09-2017 , 10:27 AM
What? It's got a biased mod lying and everything!
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-09-2017 , 10:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The REAL Trolly
As long as it's still okay for me to call LowKey a bitch, I'm okay with the totally arbitrary rules.
I think Noodle has done enough to make the case for me that the possessive use of 'bitch' (at least) is misogynistic. Other usages are still under consideration.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-09-2017 , 10:34 AM
Which of those posts was a personal attack Chez?
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-09-2017 , 10:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
Which of those posts was a personal attack Chez?
The were unacceptable in a content thread. Which did I say were personal attacks?
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-09-2017 , 10:39 AM
Why is calling a post a personal attack unacceptable? I'm not attacking the poster I'm attacking his post. And it still doesn't explain why he can respond with a personal attack without getting warned about it.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-09-2017 , 10:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
I think Noodle has done enough to make the case for me that the possessive use of 'bitch' (at least) is misogynistic. Other usages are still under consideration.
I'm not sure if you really grasp what "possessive use" means, but otherwise this seems fair.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-09-2017 , 10:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
Why is calling a post a personal attack unacceptable? I'm not attacking the poster I'm attacking his post. And it still doesn't explain why he can respond with a personal attack without getting warned about it.
He was warned about his posts.

The content threads are not the place for you to call out posts or posters that you think break the rules. It's been explained to you several times now.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-09-2017 , 11:16 AM
Where was he warned about issuing personal attacks?
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-09-2017 , 11:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
This thread is only half as AIDSy as the recent POG thread. Y'all need to step up your game.
Not if you like your AIDS with added leprosy.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-09-2017 , 12:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The REAL Trolly
I'm not sure if you really grasp what "possessive use" means, but otherwise this seems fair.
Thanks. I'm sure you will help me become aware of any deficiencies.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-09-2017 , 10:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
I think Noodle has done enough to make the case for me that the possessive use of 'bitch' (at least) is misogynistic. Other usages are still under consideration.
The problem with this is that no one was using the term in a possessive sense, so it's pretty unclear why you would move to ban the usage as it was never used.

So again, you're taking action against people who were mean to you, and looking the other way to people sympathetic to your cause.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-09-2017 , 10:57 PM
I've no idea what you're unhappy about now. Posters you seem to think are on my side are unhappy because you have got your way - which you largely have.

Somehow you are still moaning about it.

Last edited by chezlaw; 02-09-2017 at 11:02 PM.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-09-2017 , 11:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noodle Wazlib
The problem with this is that no one was using the term in a possessive sense, so it's pretty unclear why you would move to ban the usage as it was never used.

So again, you're taking action against people who were mean to you, and looking the other way to people sympathetic to your cause.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
Where was he warned about issuing personal attacks?
.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-10-2017 , 12:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
I've no idea what you're unhappy about now. Posters you seem to think are on my side are unhappy because you have got your way - which you largely have.

Somehow you are still moaning about it.
Are you really this obtuse or is this intentional?
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-10-2017 , 08:28 AM
I like the fact that the moderator doesn't understand basic English. Keeps things fresh and exciting.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-10-2017 , 09:59 AM
Then lets keep it very simple for those of you who find it hard to understand.

If you see new posts where people are making misogynistic insults then report them as misogynistic. If you think there are many then start off by reporting the most offensive ones.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote
02-10-2017 , 11:15 AM
just tell them to stop being pusses.
Politics version 7.0 discussion safe space Quote

      
m