you have reminded me i must do laundry. thank you.

I wouldn't say trolls because i think they believe what they say. But many are just bad posters with badly formed views that disrupt. At least the chronic complainers.

I dont know why they like Well Named so much. He would of got around to banning most of them too.

These are actual arguments. They can be dissected and challenged. Every credible stat I've seen points towards a massive racial disparity in single parent homes. Remember this was extracted from a debate with Well Named about the disproportionate poverty levels by race in the USA. If you can't listen to or tolerate a discussion about disparity in poverty, you shouldn't be a moderator. If someone points out racial disparity in poverty, it doesn't make them (well named) a racist. If someone points out racial disparity in single parent homes, it doesn't make them (me) a racist.

One thing I find common on the far left is the oppressor vs oppressed narrative causes a large disconnect in perspective and it creates a reflexive repulsion to the language I used. Like I hold adults accountable for their behavior. I feel empathy for the children being abandoned and I'm irritated at those who failed to take on their responsibility as a father. I think leftist perspective lends more to the pov that black men are oppressed and therefore I'm criticizing the oppressed. A black adults oppression aside, abandoning their child makes them an oppressor and a bad person. That standard is also color blind

Calling any of this "white supremacy" is for simpletons. I'm literally standing up for black children and calling out anyone who doesn't take responsibility for their own children. The only thing racial about this is the disproportionate number of single mothers in the black community. If you think those stats are wrong, the appropriate argument is that I am wrong. Not I'm therefore evil. This all goes back to intolerance, biased, and closed minded behavior

You and well named say very different things when talking about racial disparities. We can look later in that thread where you engage well named and deny the existence of systemic racism because there aren't any laws on the books that are explicitly anti-black.

Nah, you're clearly making a case explaining why black people are inferior to white people, and working on shaming black people, rather than looking to make their station any better or more just.

But he has evidence of their small brains and how they cant integrate with western culture!!

Cue youtube vid...

e.g.

Same thing with women (especially in the workforce)!

I dont want to share my views on who Well Named would ban but he is considered fair and that matters a lot even if they disagree with the decision.

This is why you're a terrible mod and unable to operate in an unbiased manner

Abandoning your children is bad, regardless of race

A disproportionate number of black children are raised with absent fathers

Those are two arguments that you are welcome to dispute. The evidence is clear. You're also welcome to dispute the moon landing. Facts are racist? This isn't about "supremacy" its about racial disparity and poverty. Something I believe well named has taken upon himself to lecture everyone on. According to the mod of the politics forum believing the mountain of stats and Don Lemon himself that there is a disproportionate number of black kids with absent fathers is good enough to label you a white supremacists and its not even up for debate. Or is it the fact that kids being raised without a father being bad is a deplorable pov?

Or is it that I thought that during Obama's second term that systemic racism wasn't a current problem. Perhaps you could enlighten me on which part of systemic racism Obama had completely ignored while he was in the whitehouse. All well named produced was an encyclopedia explaining disproportionate traffic stops. I guess not conforming to your view once again is deplorable. It obviously makes someone a white supremacist to think Obama would have at least made the issues public. Clearly these things shouldn't be up for debate... The level of Hubris

I like Larry Elders take on the situation. But who cares? I'm a white supremacists and disagreeing with any of your views isn't up for debate. The simplicity and intolerance you express is just pathetic. You're a moderator

This is the nut low posting that needs to be given no rope. Nobody has ever presented anything like this except you. I've never seen anyone suggest this. Get a grip

i'm a one pager. (see lindsey graham advising barr)

i just read that wookie is a terrible mod because you are a white supremacist.

want to try again? use less words than me.

This is just another demonstration of bias and intolerance. You guys have been operating in an echo chamber so long that you reflexively mock and detest anyone speaking against the narrative

There's plenty of quality of research showing that women are doing better at school than men at every level. They are making as much or more money prior to having children. But anyone citing credible research or speaking up is a deplorable sexist. These things aren't up for debate!!!

More tolerant and super woke moderation

less words.

Can you greet us with a picture of the dog cone on your head more often? That was hilarious

I Know. That is why they would of got banned and then, not respected him.

deleted

Does he actually attack you or is this just from your observations of others being attacked?

My take on things is that Angelina Jolie tries to mould her men into something they really don't want to be and once they get sick of it they dump her.

And in football:

i've lost some weight because of this picture, but chico is still going strong.

I said something wrong earlier, which I should correct. Juan clearly loves ATF politics threads more than I do.

So you're saying if I take a picture of myself with a dog and a cone and no shirt I can lose weight? I'm willing to give it a shot.

If you want to complain about or praise Politics, its moderators or users, give suggestions, whatever - rather than post o/t in other threads or start threads that are likely to be locked or deleted, please stick to posting in this dedicated thread and you will probably get away with most stuff.

Thank you.

I've gotten into with Fly but that was many years ago. If memory serves, Wookie Temp banned me and correctly so for spouting a bunch of ignorant **** just to piss him off I think. He came out ahead.

You are just reinforcing why you are exiled from the politics forum. Here’s a hint:

Thinking that the news is fake is not a “centrist” point of view.
Thinking that the news is fake is not a “centrist” point of view.
Thinking that the news is fake is not a “centrist” point of view.