LAND OWNERSHIP IS SLAVERY

Friend, we can just agree that it’s a poorly written question.

any other tests like this?

my results came back: Economic Left/Right: -1.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.72

but there were a number of questions when i would have preferred to neither agree or disagree. or depends on the specifics.

Economic Left/Right: 3.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.28

Tons

https://www.isidewith.com/political-quiz

on this forum, with those stats, you are literally worse than hitler

MAGA

I agree. Quite a few questions I was indifferent about (at least the way they were written).

5.75, -3.28

wat? how is that even possible?

I got rand, trump, Johnson, walker, Cruz, mcmullin then Rubio. I was surprised to see trump that high.

Unless you hit show dropped out candidates it only shows you a few.

Some of the questions are really poor. Do you believe your race is superior to all other races? or something like that. Obviously most people are going to disagree even if in practice they discriminate against other races.

re: wanting to neither agree or disagree

i agree with the results of the other quiz:

read them and weep:

I think you underestimate to which the degree people have publicly gone to bat on 2+2 (let alone being honest with an anonymous quiz) for the idea that the reason whites/Europeans basically won history against non-whites is due to racial superiority

Didn't anyone read Guns, Germs, and Steel?

So we simply make one forum for each of them quadrants and we're golden, right?

my bad goofy, i thought all the racists 2p2ers cried when they got called out for it. i didn't realize they were literally spouting off about white supremacy.

Yes, an alcoholic that recorded himself pouring a beer on his head the night Trump won the election because he was so excited is exactly what the politics forum needs.

If they did that which one would you post in most often. I only ask because I enjoy posting in politics on 2+2 because the overwhelming majority of people here oppose my views. This has given me an opportunity to debate and learn why I'm wrong or right and become more knowledgable. I often wonder why liberal posters on 2+2 even post in political threads here since they have so few opponents to debate.

Oh really - how come the republicans hold so much power in Washington?

First, it’s a great way to stay informed. I could read a hundred news sites by myself or group-source that **** and let the important stories bubble up.

Second, there’s not a lot of political philosophy debates that really happen, over the last ten years that stuff has mostly been sorted. It’s rare that there’s a new interesting take on an issue, but it does happen. See that thread about land ownership from a few years back. People have mostly figured out who they are and where they belong.

Finally, just because people are liberal generally doesn’t mean they always agree on every point about every issue. There’s plenty of disagreement, but if your main world view is “screw libruls,” you might not notice it.

Because you have the Heritage Foundation types who are appalled by Trump and many things he has done but are thrilled about the policies they are using him to get through. Then you have the "populist types" that just love Trump's behavior that pisses people off and don't really care/are ignorant about his actual policy.

Doesn't fit the narrative.