Loaded question.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loaded_question

So troll A is like this

This is a largely loaded question
Care to answer?

No not really.

Okay here goes.

....

You can't answer it. Can you? Just what I thought. Typical snowflake, yadada. You jusr can't handle that I am an expert, yadada.

No. It's not a loaded question. It's a simple question. It's a relevant question. It's a question you've already claimed others have gotten wrong. It has a simple answer. I know that answer.

Do you ??

Several times, I've mentioned that ACers, and it seems their water carriers at times, are the most lazy, ignorant, and least inquisitive alleged -ism-ers on the whole interwebs. This is the canonical example.

Yup, I'm a lazy water carrying slave. You're an expert, special indeed. Lol.

Questions about criminal justice in a hypothetical society that someone alleges has no government are quite obviously relevant and on topic. I guess you want him banned for raising the issue in a snarky manner? Well, I am sorry that not everyone treats your thought experiment with the gravitas you think it deserves, but no, snark is not against the rules.

Thank the maker!

Except when you say something like, "statism is a religion" with a twitter hashtag then it's omg call the hazmat. To repeat what I prefer is a two way street.

Also, there was no question in the original post I referred to. This is all a giant back-peddle.

Hahahahaha, see my earlier post.

I mean, my side of the argument was conviniently deleted.

Don't sell yourself short. With ACism, it's always a trifecta.

You are ignorant of the answer. You are too lazy to look up the answer for yourself. And you are so uninquisitive that you don't even want me to tell you the answer.

You just want the question to go away. Sad.

LOL@u indeed. ETA: fool, I'm not a mod. You have your "two way street" with me. The mean old MrWookie can't hurt you here. WTF, are you just being a special snowflake ???/?

Allegedly.

You are full of vile assumptions about me. Swing and a miss, three times in one post by my count.

Yes allegedly.

OK man, I've got an experiment for you. Not a thought experiment, because I'm much more of an empiricist. Go into the active AC thread, post your hash tag, and see if I ban you.

I don't know if it was allegedly you, tbh. As we all know empirical research requires laboratory conditions. But I am fine with snark.

Well, the ban opportunity will be open to Noodle, Tom, Mike Haven, and Mat.

You must realise your 'experiment' is more trolling than scientific because after all this discussion and 'offer' to settle it by experiment, you're now unlikely to give a ban even if you would have done before the discussion.

i think a few times in this thread people have questioned bans, when they happened and who pulled the trigger. if so, i can actually answer that if wanted.

i don't have access to whatever reason was given.

Wookie, is your take that it is snark and a loaded question, snark alone, or loaded question alone?

Also, ST claimed that ACism's endgame is rapetown.us.

That's not asking about the "criminal justice system". Though I'm guessing the highest rape rates per capita are in densely populated prisons, not a theoretical political system, in real life.

I'm fine with answering questions about the "criminal justice system" theory might work in ACism. I'm not fine answering twenty loaded questions by our resident self-accoladed narcissistic troll here !!!1!.

I'd sooner argue with the sign wavers in front of the hospital shouting, "Abortion is murder." I'm not saying it's a waste of time, just that it's a waste of my time.

My temp-ban was alleged only.

Pussy

No. You are misrepresenting positions expressed by ACers as my positions. We've been over this several times before. But, if you insist, I can rub your nose in it one more time.

No, you're citing a convenient "anonymous source" on reddit to erect a strawman.

It is snark, and it is skipping over an extensive history of AC discussions in Politics and Chezland that had arrived at that point. If it feels out of the blue to you, it is because you have missed a bunch. Like, the whole history of talking AC here, if we grant that there is such a thing (I do not), is following the premises to some uncomfortable conclusions. If you don't like that, then it seems like you just want to have a safe space to JAQ off.

It is a loaded question.