Quote:
Originally Posted by TiltedDonkey
What is invalid about it? Can you provide an example of a Donald Trump lie on the list that is invalid or a Barack Obama lie that is not on the list?
because regardless of the content it is utterly devoid of value
they don't reveal methodology, they don't define timeline, they don't define variables and don't reveal conflicts.
where are they taking the lies from? what doesn't count as something that you can find lie in? what if trump talks more in things you are sampling, does that matter? who is deciding on this, and what are the criteria for it?
they take the ethos of a scientific paper, with none of the trappings.
its just propaganda there's no other way around it, its an entirely subjective article they smear the veneer of objectivity on.