Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included
View Poll Results: Should 2+2 ban signatures?
No
35 19.55%
Yes, except 1-2 word poster's real name sigs.
27 15.08%
Yes, all sigs
98 54.75%
Bastard!
19 10.61%

04-08-2012 , 04:30 AM
as the creator of the 'trolling sig' as in a sig with a message i think you shouldnt ban them, mods getting bees in there bonnets just need to relaax its only a sentence on a post, and if it tilts you that bad then you need a long look at your life and what your doing with it

keep on truckin 8-)

jay b
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-08-2012 , 05:12 AM
Very good post Lee
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-08-2012 , 05:14 AM
Can we please change the title of this thread to "If you use a signature on 2p2, please post here!"

Thanks for posting JB! Your contribution is duly noted and this way I didn't have to wait to notice your sig in the wild to ignore you.

Lee's post was good and is probably the reason a simple name or Regards, Name isn't annoying.

- WalterS

"You mark that frame an 8, and you're entering a world of pain. A world of pain. [shouting] Has the whole world gone crazy? Am I the only one around here who gives a **** about the rules? Mark it zero! Mark it zero! You think I'm ****ing around here? Mark it zero!

It's a league game, Smokey"

Last edited by WalterS; 04-08-2012 at 05:17 AM. Reason: .
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-08-2012 , 05:17 AM
lol join date mar 2012 posts 157?

come on bro just leave it yeah
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-08-2012 , 05:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by WalterS
Can we please change the title of this thread to "no one gives a ****"
Signed,
FYP

Quote:
Please don't judge me because of my join date/post count. I have been around these forums since 04 on my main account. I started this one for anonymity.
Can't say I blame you.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-08-2012 , 07:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Chocula
Mocking people doesn't cause them to stop posting. I've tried.
that is true. one of choc's rare sober moments.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-08-2012 , 10:07 AM
Mocking people also results in massive derailments of the thread in which the mocking occurs.

Obviously this isn't an issue in forums like 4L or BBV, where mocking and derailments are part of the fun and often result in the best threads, but it's much more a problem in forums like NVG.

Regards,
Buttsecks Mod
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-08-2012 , 11:19 AM
the solution?

Spoiler:


Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-08-2012 , 01:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by caseycjc
Signed,
FYP



Can't say I blame you.
Nah, people care and sigs are annoying. It just turns out that more is being done than I knew apparently.

My other account is in just fine standing and well respected, I started this one so I could A) post about the forums like here without feeling like a huge nerd and B) share more personal information anonymously like this: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/34...e-her-1179882/


Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT RJ
Mocking people also results in massive derailments of the thread in which the mocking occurs.

Obviously this isn't an issue in forums like 4L or BBV, where mocking and derailments are part of the fun and often result in the best threads, but it's much more a problem in forums like NVG.

Regards,
Buttsecks Mod
Exactly. I'm glad to learn that more is being done about sigs than I previously thought. Can you share if you warned tompakee or did his signature not cross the line in your eyes? It definitely caused a derail.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SpeedLimiter
the solution?

Spoiler:


Too bad this doesn't work for the derails.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-08-2012 , 01:21 PM
There's been enough truckin at this point.

Cease all truckin.

Sincerely,
R Crumb
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-08-2012 , 02:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by WalterS
Exactly. I'm glad to learn that more is being done about sigs than I previously thought. Can you share if you warned tompakee or did his signature not cross the line in your eyes? It definitely caused a derail.
I PMed tompakee to ask him to consider not using (or changing) his signature, but I think he already left the FTP thread. And I was very specific in letting him know that he was not in violation of any rules, and that ultimately if he did not want to change his signature he didn't have to.

In my eyes, the signature did not cause the derail. People bitching about the signature in an inappropriate place caused the derail. However, I don't think anyone was infracted, I just deleted a bunch of stuff.

I find it ironic that some of the say people who complain (a lot) about moderator actions and freedom of speech are some of the same people who complained about the signature. Apparently freedom of speech only applies if you personally are not annoyed by it.

That's not aimed at you, OP, just a general observation.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-08-2012 , 02:46 PM
I've run across that tompakee signature a few times and its annoying as hell. Its like there's no separation between his signature and the end of his post, so I get tricked into reading that bulls--t every time.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-08-2012 , 06:53 PM
Quote:
My other account is in just fine standing and well respected, I started this one so I could A) post about the forums like here without feeling like a huge nerd and B) share more personal information anonymously like this: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/34...e-her-1179882/
I hope you're family situation has gotten better.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-08-2012 , 07:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by caseycjc
I hope you're family situation has gotten better.
*your


- NMHU.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-08-2012 , 07:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by caseycjc
I hope you're family situation has gotten better.
Much much better, thanks! Rough week there though.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-08-2012 , 08:39 PM
I think people might appreciate signatures if they were entertaining. -- something like classic movie quotes, especially if they're not the ones usually trotted out.

____________________

"You're wearing your **********!"

-- Sohphie Zawitowski (Meryl Streep), "Sophie's Choice"
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-08-2012 , 08:45 PM
Of course, the profanity filter hurts. Sophie meant to say seersucker, so that shouldn't count as profanity.

__________________

"You're going to look pretty funny trying to eat corn on the cob with no ****ing teeth!"

Tucker McElroy (Charles Napier), "The Blues Brothers"
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-08-2012 , 11:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eponymous
I think people might appreciate signatures if they were entertaining. -- something like classic movie quotes, especially if they're not the ones usually trotted out.

____________________

"You're wearing your **********!"

-- Sohphie Zawitowski (Meryl Streep), "Sophie's Choice"

This. People love this.




-monkeylumpNMHU

"Drop that zero and get with the hero.". -Vanilla Ice (Cool as Ice)
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-09-2012 , 03:01 AM
Let's NOT ban signatures!



_________________________

Keep on truckin'
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-09-2012 , 08:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by plaaynde
Let's NOT ban signatures!



_________________________

Keep on truckin'
You forgot the all-important "8-)". Without that sideways smiley, the true meaning is lost.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-09-2012 , 09:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ractar
You forgot the all-important "8-)". Without that sideways smiley, the true meaning is lost.
OK



_________________________

Keep on tracking
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-09-2012 , 01:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ractar
You forgot the all-important "8-)". Without that sideways smiley, the true meaning is lost.
i'm about to blow your mind

keep on truckin'

______________________

8-)
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-12-2012 , 02:38 AM
Reading this thread reminded me of a "poem" from a play titled, The Psychoed

As I was going up the stair
I met a man who wasn't there.
He wasn't there again today.
I wish, I wish he'd go away.






Quote:
Originally Posted by Lovesantiques
Gregorio,

Long ago, probably before most posters on this forum were even born, there were no personal computers. Let alone an Internet, www, forums, etc.

Back then, people were taught that signing one's name to the bottom of a missive was considered mandatory courtesy. And has become an ingrained habit that just feels totally wrong to break, even though intellectually we know that the rules (on the internet at least) have changed and signatures are no longer considered necessary, and by some at least not even desirable.

Thus, some of us sign posts. Even though most don't.

Having said that, I do see a clear distinction between a simple signature (typed, but still a signature IMHO) with perhaps a "regards", "sincerly yours", or something of that ilk, and those who sign with long verbalizings and/or images. The latter get to be bulky, unnecessarily repetitious, and simply make a forum harder to read.

That's my viewpoint, and thank you for asking!

Lee
A reasonable explanation and viewpoint. I especially like the comment in the last paragraph. Simple signatures are a quirk or an atavistic twitch that at most is mildly esoteric, hardly annoying, and much ado about nothing. Adding more than that however enters into another realm. A curb on that type of activity by posters may be justified depending on intent. Trying to implement such a curb on verbose signatures however will surely be much more difficult than most here realize. Shooting or hanging come to mind but that as yet canít be done effectively by the exchange of ether waves through the internet.

Perhaps all should consider it a test of stoicism. Those that have none lose out and must suffer horribly; wailing in the darkness, yelling at clouds, eyes bulging from their sockets to the point of exploding, and finally having their minds melt into complete pools of mush. So all in all this is a good thing I think.

-Zeno
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-12-2012 , 11:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeno
Reading this thread reminded me of a "poem" from a play titled, The Psychoed

As I was going up the stair
I met a man who wasn't there.
He wasn't there again today.
I wish, I wish he'd go away.








A reasonable explanation and viewpoint. I especially like the comment in the last paragraph. Simple signatures are a quirk or an atavistic twitch that at most is mildly esoteric, hardly annoying, and much ado about nothing. Adding more than that however enters into another realm. A curb on that type of activity by posters may be justified depending on intent. Trying to implement such a curb on verbose signatures however will surely be much more difficult than most here realize. Shooting or hanging come to mind but that as yet can’t be done effectively by the exchange of ether waves through the internet.

Perhaps all should consider it a test of stoicism. Those that have none lose out and must suffer horribly; wailing in the darkness, yelling at clouds, eyes bulging from their sockets to the point of exploding, and finally having their minds melt into complete pools of mush. So all in all this is a good thing I think.

-Zeno
Keep on truckin' o-)



____________________________

The Cyclope
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-13-2012 , 04:36 AM
Just wanna try this on, see how it fits.

-uFO
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote

      
m