Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
I see 52.48% of people are saying yes to a definite ban. If tyou allow 1 - 2 word sigs then you might as well allow all sigs. This was only put in because Mason always signs his posts and there is no way any mod will tell him he cannot.
anywho as Bobo said i am not breaking any rules and it's pretty hilarious that with all that's going on in the world a couple of forum "regs" are getting their panties all knotted up over an extra few words on the end of a post!
Is misé Tompakee®
Well, regardless of what I said about the rules, it's pretty clear you're trying to weasel out of what you said earlier. The 1-2 word sig has nothing to do with Mason, because obviously a rule could be put in place that Mason wouldn't need to follow.
71% of respondents clearly don't like anything beyond a 1-2 word sig of your real name. Over 78% of those who expressed an opinion feel the same way.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
If it annoyed 90% or even 66% of people then i would have no problem stopping using it but as the only people who it seems to bother are a few who seem to think that this site is their personal domain i will keep using it. If you don't like my signature then please feel free to place me on your ignore list. I will sleep soundly tonight either way.
Is Misé Tompakee®
You thought sigs only bothered a few people, and have been proven very wrong. You went so far as to put a % on what it would take to convince you to stop using it. It's not like you signed a binding contract, so if you want to try to go back on this now, that's up to you.
This all came up because you claimed you weren't doing it to annoy people; seems like it's getting harder for you to defend that stance IMO.