Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included
View Poll Results: Should 2+2 ban signatures?
No
35 19.55%
Yes, except 1-2 word poster's real name sigs.
27 15.08%
Yes, all sigs
98 54.75%
Bastard!
19 10.61%

04-24-2012 , 02:31 PM









__________________________________________________ _______

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/55...tures-1189913/
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-24-2012 , 10:35 PM
sigs are stupid and that tompkee guy is straight up ****ing ******ed. I had to put him on ignore b/c he was so annoying. permaban imo.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 03:44 AM
So are signatures banned yet?
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 03:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gin 'n Tonic
So are signatures banned yet?
Nope.

Is misé Tompakee®
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 04:06 AM
I'm confused

Quote:
Dear holden,

You have received a warning at Two Plus Two Poker Forums.

Reason:
-------
Please do not post your "signature" again.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 04:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by holden
I'm confused
Posting a signature of that length is considered "spamming" .

Is misé Tompakee®
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 06:36 AM
Why did you lie tompakee?
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 06:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by WalterS
Why did you lie tompakee?
Where have i lied? I said 66% and it's no where near 66% yet!

Is misé Tompakee®
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 07:07 AM
100 votes now

70 for ban,

20 against

Last edited by Mr.mmmKay; 04-25-2012 at 07:08 AM. Reason: Kevmode's vote should count for -10 though
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 07:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
This already happens. It's not like no one has ever been warned or infracted for a sig; it just doesn't happen often, and the threshold for when this happens is much higher than you'd like.

Please put Tompakee on your "case by case" list.

His sig is ridiculous, means nothing, takes up space and is bad for everyone's blood pressure.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 07:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
Where have i lied? I said 66% and it's no where near 66% yet!
Why are you blatantly lying right here? You just want to get your way and lack the integrity to stick to your word.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 07:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
Where have i lied? I said 66% and it's no where near 66% yet!

Is misé Tompakee®
Over 70% of people have voted Yes to ban signatures. It is not hard to understand. Did you miss the part of the vote that is "Yes, except 1-2 word poster's real name sigs."?

Your signature definitely doesn't fall under that caveat. That means they would be for allowing a a "Walter" or "Mason" at the bottom of a post. In other words over 70% of people are AGAINST YOUR STUPID IS MISE SIGNATURE and think it should be banned.

I'm done with you. You really are a piece of work.

edit: And to the mods, it really is ridiculous that that dude in the thread gets warned for using a joke signature when you let tompakee keep using his damned signature that numerous people have complained about.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 07:28 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by WalterS
edit: And to the mods, it really is ridiculous that that dude in the thread gets warned for using a joke signature when you let tompakee keep using his damned signature that numerous people have complained about.
Why is it ridiculous? Is there some rule that he is violating that I'm not aware of? Is it ridiculous that some mods have a different threshold of what is acceptable than you do? Sorry we don't all think exactly the same way that you do.

That's not to say his sig will always be allowed, but that hardly means it's ridiculous that he's allowed to use it.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 07:34 AM
I see 52.48% of people are saying yes to a definite ban. If tyou allow 1 - 2 word sigs then you might as well allow all sigs. This was only put in because Mason always signs his posts and there is no way any mod will tell him he cannot.

anywho as Bobo said i am not breaking any rules and it's pretty hilarious that with all that's going on in the world a couple of forum "regs" are getting their panties all knotted up over an extra few words on the end of a post!

Is misé Tompakee®
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 07:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
I see 52.48% of people are saying yes to a definite ban. If tyou allow 1 - 2 word sigs then you might as well allow all sigs. This was only put in because Mason always signs his posts and there is no way any mod will tell him he cannot.
No, there's a clear difference in real name sigs and yours. As I said here:

Quote:
Originally Posted by ganstaman
I can see signing your real name as it isn't otherwise on the post and personalizes the message, but signing your username is just pointless and annoying.
So over 66% want sigs like yours to not be used. It's your call if you want to stick to your word or not.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 07:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
I see 52.48% of people are saying yes to a definite ban. If tyou allow 1 - 2 word sigs then you might as well allow all sigs. This was only put in because Mason always signs his posts and there is no way any mod will tell him he cannot.

anywho as Bobo said i am not breaking any rules and it's pretty hilarious that with all that's going on in the world a couple of forum "regs" are getting their panties all knotted up over an extra few words on the end of a post!

Is misé Tompakee®
Well, regardless of what I said about the rules, it's pretty clear you're trying to weasel out of what you said earlier. The 1-2 word sig has nothing to do with Mason, because obviously a rule could be put in place that Mason wouldn't need to follow.

71% of respondents clearly don't like anything beyond a 1-2 word sig of your real name. Over 78% of those who expressed an opinion feel the same way.


Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
If it annoyed 90% or even 66% of people then i would have no problem stopping using it but as the only people who it seems to bother are a few who seem to think that this site is their personal domain i will keep using it. If you don't like my signature then please feel free to place me on your ignore list. I will sleep soundly tonight either way.

Is Misé Tompakee®
You thought sigs only bothered a few people, and have been proven very wrong. You went so far as to put a % on what it would take to convince you to stop using it. It's not like you signed a binding contract, so if you want to try to go back on this now, that's up to you.

This all came up because you claimed you weren't doing it to annoy people; seems like it's getting harder for you to defend that stance IMO.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 07:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by WalterS
Over 70% of people have voted Yes to ban signatures. It is not hard to understand. Did you miss the part of the vote that is "Yes, except 1-2 word poster's real name sigs."?

Your signature definitely doesn't fall under that caveat. That means they would be for allowing a a "Walter" or "Mason" at the bottom of a post. In other words over 70% of people are AGAINST YOUR STUPID IS MISE SIGNATURE and think it should be banned.

I'm done with you. You really are a piece of work.

edit: And to the mods, it really is ridiculous that that dude in the thread gets warned for using a joke signature when you let tompakee keep using his damned signature that numerous people have complained about.
Actually my REAL name is Tompakee so i do fall under this caveat

Is misé Tompakee®
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 07:55 AM
Your real name is "Is misé Tompakee® "?

You have cruel parents.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 07:57 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
Your real name is "Is misé Tompakee® "?

You have cruel parents.
Nope but Tompakee is an amalgamation of my christian and surnames. The rest is just decoration

Is misé Tompakee®
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 08:00 AM
I know, let him keep his sig.

Just perma-ban him for being a dick
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 08:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBump
I know, let him keep his sig.

Just perma-ban him for being a dick
LOL at panties in a twist because my "annoying signature" has invaded your little online world yet resorting to childish name calling is seen as a big thumbs up? And fwiw i have had pm's from several of the posters itt saying "keep the sig just get rid of the smiley as its annoying". So it's the smiley that pisses people off not the sig!

Is misé Tompakee®
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 08:14 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
LOL at panties in a twist because my "annoying signature" has invaded your little online world yet resorting to childish name calling is seen as a big thumbs up? And fwiw i have had pm's from several of the posters itt saying "keep the sig just get rid of the smiley as its annoying". So it's the smiley that pisses people off not the sig!

Is misé Tompakee®
You're the one that thinks he special apparently.

dick
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 08:20 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBump
You're the one that thinks he special apparently.

dick
Lol i am nothing of the sort although i will admit to being intrigued as to why an extra couple of words at the end of a post upsets you so much?

Is misé Tompakee®
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 08:39 AM
Bobo said:

Quote:
This all came up because you claimed you weren't doing it to annoy people; seems like it's getting harder for you to defend that stance IMO.

****** said:

Quote:
And fwiw i have had pm's from several of the posters itt saying "keep the sig just get rid of the smiley as its annoying". So it's the smiley that pisses people off not the sig!

Is misé Tompakee®


Clearly doing it just to piss people off.


Ban please
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 08:46 AM
That sig tilts me to no end.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBump
Clearly doing it just to piss people off.


Ban please
This works too:

tompakee has now been successfully added to your ignore list. You will now be returned to where you were.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote

      
m