Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included
View Poll Results: Should 2+2 ban signatures?
No
35 19.55%
Yes, except 1-2 word poster's real name sigs.
27 15.08%
Yes, all sigs
98 54.75%
Bastard!
19 10.61%

04-25-2012 , 03:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by plaaynde
plaaynde
Just for the record, I was really starting to enjoy your posting (no sarcasm), but now that I see you are using a signature, my opinion has lessened somewhat.










-jalex
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 03:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalexand42
Just for the record, I was really starting to enjoy your posting (no sarcasm), but now that I see you are using a signature, my opinion has lessened somewhat.
Are you sure it was a signature? Maybe just a low content post
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 04:00 PM
jalex,

Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 04:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
+1

Is mise Tompakee
Really bro? Really? You completely ignored gregorio's excellent post.


-snagglepuss
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 04:41 PM
I did some research itt. Here are the relevant results:
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
Wowzers a whole thread whinging about sigs...How many kids missed their ritalin today?

FWIW sarge did send me a pm asking me to shorten my sig which i have done (except in the riggie thread cos they just deserve all the pain) But i will still continue to use my sig whenever i can. the following post makes a lot of sense imo.





As so many people are complaining about my sig i will translate for you ( though a simple google search could have told you this).

Is misé Tompakee literally means I am (with respect) Tompakee

Just be happy i don't use this as my sig

Go n-éirí an bóthar leat
Go raibh an ghaoth go brách ag do chúl
Go lonraí an ghrian go te ar d'aghaidh
Go dtite an bháisteach go mín ar do pháirceanna
Agus go mbuailimid le chéile arís,
Go gcoinní Dia i mbos A láimhe thú.

Is misé Tompakee
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
Erm look again....My signature is 3 words and a smiley. I said i COULD use the longer one. Jeez so many people with issues on here.

Is misé Tompakee®
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
Ah you mean from previous post in a different thread.

Is misé Tompakee®
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
See this is not something that would bother me! Maybe you should spend less time caring about someone posting an extra 3 words in a comment on an internet forum.

Is misé Tompakee®
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
If it annoyed 90% or even 66% of people then i would have no problem stopping using it but as the only people who it seems to bother are a few who seem to think that this site is their personal domain i will keep using it. If you don't like my signature then please feel free to place me on your ignore list. I will sleep soundly tonight either way.

Is Misé Tompakee®
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
Seriously?




That's probably the best thing for you. Go get some fresh air, see some sights, Realize that words on a computer screen are just words on a computer screen and nothing more.

Is misé Tompakee®
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
Not trying to be annoying an just bemused as to how someone can.

(A) Get upset over someones signature.

(B) Get upset over someones avatar. (Yours is not that great but do i complain?)

(C) Insists on replying to someone if they "annoy" you so much?


ANYWHO

Is misé Tompakee®
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
I'll go warn the sheep i hear he's a BAAAAAAAAAAAA'D boy

Is misé Tompakee®
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
I mise means "I am with respect"


Is mise Tompakee
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
Wrong. If the 66% say that sigs should be banned then i will agree. But when we mean sigs i take this to mean not only my Sig but also

NMHU
and
Regards Mason.

Is mise Tompakee
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
""Is misé le meas" " I s the full sentence but it's ok to just post Is misé As the le meas or with respect Is implied.

Is misé Tompakee®
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
At least 46 posters itt would disagree with you!

Is misé Tompakee®
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
Nope.

Is misé Tompakee®
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
Posting a signature of that length is considered "spamming" .

Is misé Tompakee®
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
Where have i lied? I said 66% and it's no where near 66% yet!

Is misé Tompakee®
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
I see 52.48% of people are saying yes to a definite ban. If tyou allow 1 - 2 word sigs then you might as well allow all sigs. This was only put in because Mason always signs his posts and there is no way any mod will tell him he cannot.

anywho as Bobo said i am not breaking any rules and it's pretty hilarious that with all that's going on in the world a couple of forum "regs" are getting their panties all knotted up over an extra few words on the end of a post!

Is misé Tompakee®
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
Actually my REAL name is Tompakee so i do fall under this caveat

Is misé Tompakee®
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
Nope but Tompakee is an amalgamation of my christian and surnames. The rest is just decoration

Is misé Tompakee®
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
LOL at panties in a twist because my "annoying signature" has invaded your little online world yet resorting to childish name calling is seen as a big thumbs up? And fwiw i have had pm's from several of the posters itt saying "keep the sig just get rid of the smiley as its annoying". So it's the smiley that pisses people off not the sig!

Is misé Tompakee®
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
Lol i am nothing of the sort although i will admit to being intrigued as to why an extra couple of words at the end of a post upsets you so much?

Is misé Tompakee®
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
So no one wants to answer this



Is misé Tompakee®
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
Along with

A nobel gent and **NMHU**

Is misé Tompakee®
Quote:
Originally Posted by tompakee
+1

Is mise Tompakee
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 05:38 PM
Tompakee's sig doesn't pass the golden rule imo
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 06:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
Why is it ridiculous? Is there some rule that he is violating that I'm not aware of? Is it ridiculous that some mods have a different threshold of what is acceptable than you do? Sorry we don't all think exactly the same way that you do.

That's not to say his sig will always be allowed, but that hardly means it's ridiculous that he's allowed to use it.
It is ridiculous because the same action isn't taken against tompakee when there is a public outcry for action and that it is obvious he is just doing it to troll at this point. I don't see why a clear consensus isn't enough to take action but one mod's opinion (on an actually funny sig!) is.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 06:24 PM
Because the forum isn't a democracy.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 06:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
Because the forum isn't a democracy.
Bribe any good? We could probably organise a whip round.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 06:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
Because the forum isn't a democracy.
Well of course it isn't. But when the opinion on an issue is so clear, that should push the ruling class into action imo. (and I'm not talking about sigs in general, just tompakee's. The consensus is much clearer on his it seems).
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 06:46 PM
I think it is quite likely that the mod who warned the guy in the other thread knew about Tompakee. So this mod kinda choose to do something against someone "protesting" against Tompakee and not against Tompakee himself.

I know 2+2 isn't a democracy, but i do think it's kinda weird to do exactly the opposite of what people want
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 06:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gin 'n Tonic
Bribe any good? We could probably organise a whip round.
I ****ing hate signatures, for no particular reason, so $5 on Stars and I'll nuke a poster with a signature of your choice and put it down to a 'drunken misclick'.

$10 and I'll let you pick the ban reason

$15 gets you the above and a free ban of any one poster with less than 100 posts as well.

Group discounts are available.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 07:09 PM
Serious question:

How would the mods / admin feel if everyone had "I am "SN" " in various foreign languages at the bottom of EVERY post?
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 08:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBump
Serious question:

How would the mods / admin feel if everyone had "I am "SN" " in various foreign languages at the bottom of EVERY post?
I can see this turning into a game of chicken with other ATF regs

Olen Olgu Roo
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 08:50 PM
Been tossing this around in the mod forum. Expect some action within a day.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 09:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Professionalpoker
Been tossing this around in the mod forum. Expect some action within a day.
What PP meant was:

We've had a lot of enquiries and there's lots of speculation on the forums, so I wanted to address the signatures chatter. As you know, the moderators participate in many discussions in the mod forum. As such discussions are always confidential, we are unable to comment on rumors. As soon as we have information to share publicly we will do so.










-jalex
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 09:06 PM
The new rule will be that everyone is required to use signatures.

Choose yours wisely, as bloody wars will be fought over the most clever.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 09:22 PM
Doh!
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 09:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalexand42
What PP meant was:

We've had a lot of enquiries and there's lots of speculation on the forums, so I wanted to address the signatures chatter. As you know, the moderators participate in many discussions in the mod forum. As such discussions are always confidential, we are unable to comment on rumors. As soon as we have information to share publicly we will do so.


-jalex
I might have to hire you as my speechwriter. That is if you can do it without signing everything.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 09:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Professionalpoker
I might have to hire you as my speechwriter. That is if you can do it without signing everything.
And here I thought you had the back of signature lovers everywhere.

Et tu Brute?








-jalex
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 09:56 PM
Jalex,
A+ on the release.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 09:59 PM
Damn. Tipped my hand.

Might have to start a new thread on white space.
-Mike
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 10:20 PM
your name is mike!?

that's actually really funny, because I know a mic. you two should get together and talk sometime
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 11:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Professionalpoker
Been tossing this around in the mod forum. Expect some action within a day.
Quote:
Originally Posted by jalexand42
What PP meant was:

We've had a lot of enquiries and there's lots of speculation on the forums, so I wanted to address the signatures chatter. As you know, the moderators participate in many discussions in the mod forum. As such discussions are always confidential, we are unable to comment on rumors. As soon as we have information to share publicly we will do so.










-jalex

Dang, I don't like the sarcasm signature, looks like it will be the death of our species tomorrow :/



- NMHU.

Last edited by NomoneyHU.; 04-25-2012 at 11:22 PM. Reason: signing like there's no tomorrow. (because there might not be one)
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-25-2012 , 11:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NomoneyHU.
Dang, I don't like the sarcasm signature, looks like it will be the death of our species tomorrow :/



- NMHU.


One time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



-fatty
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote

      
m