Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included
View Poll Results: Should 2+2 ban signatures?
No
35 19.55%
Yes, except 1-2 word poster's real name sigs.
27 15.08%
Yes, all sigs
98 54.75%
Bastard!
19 10.61%

04-17-2012 , 01:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle Chandler
I would like to see ANobleGent's opinion before I chime in.
so much this
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-17-2012 , 03:05 PM
Tompakee,
Throwing out the "bastard" votes, 75% of voters so far are for the banning of signatures.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-17-2012 , 03:43 PM
"Just put sig users on ignore" is a copout non-solution imho. You could apply this line of reasoning to pretty much *anything* that gets posted on the site. Trolling? Don't bother the mods, just block the offender. Blatant racism? It's all good, just block 'em. Personal attack? How do you know this guy continually posts those if you're using the ignore feature we provided for you? And so on.

I understand that some of us don't have a problem with sigs and that's cool, everyone's entitled to an opinion, but it's pretty clear that many others on the forum do not share this sentiment.

Quote:
I agree with dkgojackets IF its possible to disable the sig's by default (in favor of the anonymous lurkers). Anyone that wants to see them creates an account or enables them on their existing account.
Same.

Quote:
Originally Posted by snagglepuss
it is narcissistic and douche behavior.
ftw
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-17-2012 , 03:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by WalterS
Tompakee,
Throwing out the "bastard" votes, 75% of voters so far are for the banning of signatures.
And counting all the 'bastard' votes as don't ban, >67% of the voters so far are for banning signatures like his, which is over his threshold of 66%.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-17-2012 , 04:27 PM
The unconditional yes to ban is still a little under 50%.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-17-2012 , 04:48 PM
Sometimes all it takes is a plurality to deliver justice and freedom!

Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-17-2012 , 05:16 PM
I would classify Bastard as those that don't care.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-17-2012 , 05:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by plaaynde
The unconditional yes to ban is still a little under 50%.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-17-2012 , 06:01 PM
I didn't care about this at all until Tompakee started posting in forums I read.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-17-2012 , 06:05 PM
Tompakee, ruining signatures since 2012!
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-17-2012 , 06:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lonely_but_rich
I didn't care about this at all until Tompakee started posting in forums I read.
This. I keep reading it as '- I miss Tompakee'.
__________________________

Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-17-2012 , 06:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wiki
If people could be persuaded to make any sig a muted colour they would be a great deal easier to ignore for those who don't like them.

_______________________________________________
Even if this annoys you it's very easy to ignore.
I don't think Tompakee is easily 'persuaded', and the smiley would be just as yellow
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-17-2012 , 07:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashington
"Just put sig users on ignore" is a copout non-solution imho. You could apply this line of reasoning to pretty much *anything* that gets posted on the site. Trolling? Don't bother the mods, just block the offender. Blatant racism? It's all good, just block 'em. Personal attack? How do you know this guy continually posts those if you're using the ignore feature we provided for you? And so on.
This!


__________________________________________________ _____
Is mise, very mise
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-17-2012 , 07:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT RJ
A despite the vote, I say LOL sample size. It would be great if more posters popped into ATF, but alas, it is not so. They are missing out on the funniest forum on 2p2. Their loss.
What would you consider a good sample size?

100 seems like a pretty number

Invisible sig
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-17-2012 , 07:27 PM
Whatever is decided, please allow Greg Raymer to continue to sign his posts. Just wouldn't be the same.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-17-2012 , 07:44 PM
Is mise of Panama
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-17-2012 , 07:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thethethe
This. I keep reading it as '- I miss Tompakee'.
__________________________

GRATZ ON YOUR IGNORE!
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-17-2012 , 08:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.mmmKay
What would you consider a good sample size?

100 seems like a pretty number

Invisible sig
Compared to the size of the site? Not really.

Not that we'll ever get a good sample size in ATF.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-17-2012 , 10:39 PM
People who care about the forums come here. This is the sample that matters. **** everyone else.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-17-2012 , 10:45 PM
Ban sigs before they get out of hand.

Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-18-2012 , 12:26 AM
I can't understand why overdoing sigs just couldn't be an infraction worthy / bannable offence if continued after warning, like every other out of the hand thing at the forums.

Do we have sigs racism here?
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-18-2012 , 09:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Professionalpoker
I would classify Bastard as those that don't care.
I definitely am against sigs, but Bastard! is clearly always the correct choice in a pole.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-18-2012 , 08:56 PM
I hate sig especially that nomoneyheadsup guy who signs his poasts like this:


"- NMHU."


- NMHU.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-19-2012 , 07:36 AM
How in the world are there 16 people other than nmhu and tom p. akee that voted no?
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-19-2012 , 11:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by brianr
How in the world are there 16 people other than nmhu and tom p. akee that voted no?
Believe it or not, the internet is not just about them.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote

      
m