Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included
View Poll Results: Should 2+2 ban signatures?
No
35 19.55%
Yes, except 1-2 word poster's real name sigs.
27 15.08%
Yes, all sigs
98 54.75%
Bastard!
19 10.61%

04-06-2012 , 01:12 PM
Signatures must survive!

- I buttsecks
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-06-2012 , 01:13 PM
A signature says more than a thousand words.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-06-2012 , 01:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by plaaynde
A signature says more than a thousand words.
Who the **** posted this?

LBR
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-06-2012 , 01:16 PM
Lol poll fail
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-06-2012 , 01:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by lonely_but_rich
Who the **** posted this?

LBR
The **** is apparently me. I confess.


- MMHU

Last edited by plaaynde; 04-06-2012 at 01:22 PM. Reason: = much money heads up
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-06-2012 , 01:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by plaaynde
A signature says more than a thousand words.

Meh, depends for who, mine is only four words when you think about it :3.


- NMHU.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-06-2012 , 01:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT RJ
Signatures must survive!

- I buttsecks
Im ready for you to unveil your new undertitle

-Signatures dont sway me one way or the other tbh

"THE PAIN TRAIN IS COMING WOO WOOOOO"-BBV HITLER
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-06-2012 , 01:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackfriday415
Lol poll fail
There is no need for a poll to prove what is obviously true.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-06-2012 , 01:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by WalterS
There is no need for a poll to prove what is obviously true.
Help me, WHAT IS THE TRUTH?
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-06-2012 , 01:55 PM
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-06-2012 , 01:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by wafflehouse1
Im ready for you to unveil your new undertitle
You have more power than I imagined.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-06-2012 , 02:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2/325Falcon
Going to start signing all my posts with U mad.

-U mad.
I dare you to do it in BBV. You can't. You mad?






-monkeylump


"Listen to that sound? Hear that sound? Getting in an out of trees? That flop-flop sound? Mm, that sound will sure mistake you for turkeys. Listen. Hear that flop-flop. Limbs breaking. Hear that good flop, then? Listening to that gives me the turkey fever. Mm, I wish there were as many turkeys as there are buzzards." -Vernon, Florida
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-06-2012 , 03:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT RJ
Signatures must survive!

- I buttsecks
I think you're cool, SGT RJ.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-06-2012 , 03:30 PM
I might come around to the idea of sigs now that I've finally found a quote worthy of one.

BF

"I will not be attending this party. I personally don't find poker and partying to mix well. I see nothing that relates poker to partying. If I wanted to play poker I would just play online or at a local cardroom vs bad players. The food probably won't be any good and just doesn't seem like it is worth my time honestly." - kevmode
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-06-2012 , 03:36 PM
Proving once again why he's the undisputed master of the funnies.

- BF's biggest fan who s buttseck
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-06-2012 , 03:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT RJ
Proving once again why he's the undisputed master of the funnies.

- BF's biggest fan who s buttseck
You mean he is funnier than me?


- C'mon
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-06-2012 , 05:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by plaaynde
You have more power than I imagined.
That's right

Last edited by wafflehouse1; 04-06-2012 at 05:35 PM. Reason: -Bobo
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-06-2012 , 05:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by plaaynde
Help me, WHAT IS THE TRUTH?
That a vast majority of non dimwits do not like signatures or use them. Also that people who use signatures are insulting and wasting the time of those that do not. Nobody wants to read or see the same content-less lines of text over and over again.

And yes, I have ignored several people with signatures.

- WalterS

"You mark that frame an 8, and you're entering a world of pain. A world of pain. [shouting] Has the whole world gone crazy? Am I the only one around here who gives a **** about the rules? Mark it zero! Mark it zero! You think I'm ****ing around here? Mark it zero!

It's a league game, Smokey"
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-06-2012 , 06:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by atakdog
What does "Is mise Tompakee" even mean?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
I'm pretty sure it means I am Tompakee.
Tá tú ceart.

Spoiler:
You are right
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-06-2012 , 06:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by WalterS
That a vast majority of non dimwits do not like signatures or use them. Also that people who use signatures are insulting and wasting the time of those that do not.
How in the world do a few random lines at the end of a post, most of which simply identify the poster, constitute an insult in any way, shape, or form?

- WalterS = dimwit

would be an insult.

- NMHU

is not.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-06-2012 , 08:05 PM
Seeing as though big obnoxious auto-signatures already aren't part of this site, "banning" signatures really means having the mods make it an infraction-type offense. Most have better uses for their time.

If you can't get your OCD under control than put the users who do it on ignore
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-06-2012 , 08:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
I might come around to the idea of sigs now that I've finally found a quote worthy of one.

BF

"I will not be attending this party. I personally don't find poker and partying to mix well. I see nothing that relates poker to partying. If I wanted to play poker I would just play online or at a local cardroom vs bad players. The food probably won't be any good and just doesn't seem like it is worth my time honestly." - kevmode
kevmode is the exception that proves the rule.

The hilarious thing is that everything he says doesn't appear to have the slightest hint of insincerity.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-06-2012 , 08:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bizarro Gonso
Seeing as though big obnoxious auto-signatures already aren't part of this site, "banning" signatures really means having the mods make it an infraction-type offense. Most have better uses for their time.
Like what?



-Morphy
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-06-2012 , 08:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alrighty Roo
kevmode is the exception that proves the rule.

The frightening thing is that everything he says doesn't appear to have the slightest hint of insincerity.
FYP.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote
04-07-2012 , 12:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SGT RJ
How in the world do a few random lines at the end of a post, most of which simply identify the poster, constitute an insult in any way, shape, or form?

- WalterS = dimwit

would be an insult.

- NMHU

is not.
I guess insulting may not be the best word but I'm not sure what the word is. Disrespectful maybe or just plain inconsiderate. They are making people read the same meaningless lines of text over and over and over again (or at least attempting to until they get ignored). Inconsiderate is probably what I should have said.

I really don't know why people are arguing with me here. Maybe I haven't presented my ideas in the best manner possible, but it doesn't seem like there is much of a debate that most signatures suck.

And just to be clear I'm talking about signatures like tompakee's. Not Mason's or Nate's or even NMHU's.


I understand the complaint that it would just be more work for mods, but I don't think it's much more at all. There are very few people that use signatures like tompakee's and it wouldn't take long at all to eliminate them.

A simple rule change and a post in the mod forum, and then a few PMs/warnings to the offenders and POOF, problem solved.
Let's ban signatures! Compulsory poll included Quote

      
m