Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
I have an idea I have an idea

02-04-2019 , 01:25 AM
Definite +1 to banning bigstack
02-04-2019 , 03:11 PM
Another +1 here for banning BigStack650.
02-04-2019 , 05:20 PM
By my count we are at 7. 3 more for the ban.
02-04-2019 , 05:50 PM
I'll go -1 to ban bigstack.

Ideas should be encouraged no matter how farfetched they may seem.
02-04-2019 , 06:57 PM
That’s just wrong. Stupid ideas, like LGTBQTI folks shouldn’t be allowed to adopt, or we should kill all the brown people don’t deserve consideration.
02-05-2019 , 06:45 PM
I was against it until Bundy's post convinced me it's a good idea. First time for everything.
02-05-2019 , 08:02 PM
You guys all need to listen to me. I'M THE BIGSTACK!

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using 2+2 Forums
02-05-2019 , 08:12 PM
Jesus, can we get some more downvotes please?
02-05-2019 , 09:21 PM
+1 for banning Bigstack
02-05-2019 , 09:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tup
+1 for banning Bigstack
I concur, +1 for banning Bigstack.
02-05-2019 , 09:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tug
I concur, +1 for banning Bigstack.
That sounds like a great idea, +1 for banning Bigstack.
02-05-2019 , 09:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tul
That sounds like a great idea, +1 for banning Bigstack.
I can fly! Also +1 to banning Bigstack.
02-05-2019 , 09:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flying Tuq
I can fly! Also +1 to banning Bigstack.
Hi Guys, long time no see! +1 to banning Bigstack.
02-05-2019 , 09:38 PM
A whose who of ****ty gimmicks to ban!
02-05-2019 , 10:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
A whose who of ****ty gimmicks to ban!
I want to wake up in a city that never sleeps
And find I'm a number one, top of the list
King of the hill, a number one
02-06-2019 , 12:33 AM
years from now we'll laugh about this thread, but for now ... we subscribe
02-06-2019 , 02:17 PM
I'd like to know too what gives a mod the right to ban someone? What checks and balances are in place so mods don't abuse their power?

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using 2+2 Forums
02-06-2019 , 02:36 PM
This is a free bulletin board run by a publishing house, mods are empowered by the owners to keep the place under control. So, the same people who give you the privilege of using this board also give mods the privilege of banning people from the board. Most of the time they agree with the mod's actions, occasionally they overturn them, those are your checks and balances.

How on earth did you think it worked?

Last edited by kerowo; 02-06-2019 at 02:44 PM.
02-06-2019 , 04:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigStack650
I'd like to know too what gives a mod the right to ban someone? What checks and balances are in place so mods don't abuse their power?

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using 2+2 Forums
Mason checks.

Not sent from my basic smartphone using Tapatalk.
02-23-2019 , 02:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Videopro
I think it's funny how I got more than 10 downvotes and didn't get banned. It's obviously because the mods know I'm onto something. Think this through a bit more and get back to me when you have something to share.
02-24-2019 , 07:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigStack650
I think it's funny how I got more than 10 downvotes and didn't get banned. It's obviously because the mods know I'm onto something. Think this through a bit more and get back to me when you have something to share.
I have thought it out. I have given all considerations, significant analytical and precise methodical contemplation, and shockingly I can only draw one conclusion:

BigStack650 you sir are a ****ing genius!
02-24-2019 , 03:51 PM
So how can we make this idea into a reality? Can we set up a focus group or something with a mod?
02-24-2019 , 03:54 PM
You want 2+2 to implement a voting system for banning people? You realize that there is no limit to how many accounts you can create on the site right? So there is nothing stopping 1 person creating enough accounts to be able to auto-ban anyone? What they should do is monetize it and let people pay to temp ban posters, with each each temp ban costing more than the previous one.
02-24-2019 , 03:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
You want 2+2 to implement a voting system for banning people? You realize that there is no limit to how many accounts you can create on the site right? So there is nothing stopping 1 person creating enough accounts to be able to auto-ban anyone? What they should do is monetize it and let people pay to temp ban posters, with each each temp ban costing more than the previous one.
But people don't want to pay money for that
Closed Thread Subscribe
...

      
m