Just wondering how I can get banned from P if I never was given an opportunity to explain what I meant by the offending post even when the Wookie invited me to explain.

Any comments?

Welcome to the club.

I already have a membership. I just want to know why it exists in the first place.

Them boys swing a big **** over there in P. Of course on election night they were all pooping their pants like little girls. Only 39 months to go guys, lol.

Until wookie pops into this thread, can you note when you first realized you were unable to access the forum? Just curious how long after the offending post it was before you got exiled.

It was 19 hours.

loads of time that

Anyway, whatever bro. Exiles are reversible. Post your response here at your leisure, and we can all see why we shouldn't count 100000 dead people as long as they happen to be Iraqi civilians. Your exile stands at least until we get a non-wolfy response.

At least the electoral college did not give it to Hillary and you did not have to come kill people in NY and LA with your army militias.

I've explained it to you. Feel free to post the PM. Still astounded you didn't give me the right of reply.

Well I didn't see his post and the only way I could see it was being logged out.

Well Wookie has disregarded my response and therefore, his claims are that the 100,000 Iraqi civillians who were killed by the Coalition forces were all murdered and each of the leaders of the countries that participated should be tried for war crimes. Have I got this right Wookie? Why am I even asking as I know this is right - lol.

Here is the pm:

"Where did I say that? I simply meant that there was no intention on the part of the invading forces for those civillians to die, hence it being collateral to the coalition's purpose for invasion and bombings."

Apparently it is too hard for Bundy to post his own pms.

So apparently we are not to sweat hundreds of thousands dead as long as they are both not our people and there was no intent, even though casualties on that level were entirely predictable?

100,000? You sure about that?

And where did I infer or indeed effect any indifference to the deaths being in the middle east if, as I've already made clear, we aren't talking about the same thing when it comes to deaths being the indirect cause of military conflict and deaths being caused by suicide attacks on the west (and indeed the middle east) by these terrorists.

What was one or more tragic, unforeseeable mistakes the military (or massive numbers of civilians) made? What is a war that did not have that level of civilian casualties?

Wookie banning people who have merely legitimate disagreements of opinion with him. In any other forum that would be a demoddinig, it's like the first rule of what not to do as a mod.

He even questions them to see if they have the right "attitude", and if they don't respond quickly enough, ignore him, or fail to kowtow to his worldview, permaban/exile.

Kind of a creepy show he's running over there.

"Agree with me that we should be monstrously outraged over these particular war dead, that the perpetrators should be called war criminals, or I'll ban you if you persist in calling them collateral damage".

Absurd. Even now, here in ATF, he won't reverse an obvious error of judgment as a mod until the perpetrator bows to his political view.

Bundy, you're wasting your time.

MrWookie is a disgustingly biased individual who runs the politics forum like a despotic little tyrant with zero accountability.

Just let it go. He's not worth the effort.

Pretty ridiculous previous two comments. I think Wookie is a fine mod, and it's absurd to say he bans or exiles people just for disagreeing with him. Wookie is Christian, and I've made a couple posts very critical of Christianity in the past couple days, which I'm sure he disagrees with. I haven't been banned or exiled. Several other people also make posts critical of Christianity, and they haven't been banned or exiled, and it's pretty hard to think of something more personal to someone than their religious beliefs.

Well let us just say that Wookie is that far to the left even he wouldn't be welcome at a Democrats' round table think tank.

I mean, the dems are not a left leaning party by any stretch.

Teddy Roosevelt would be too left wing for the modern day Democratic party.

Is Sanders the only leftey?

No idea, and Sanders isn't even that far left.

Sanders isn't a Dem