Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Exiled from P without a right of reply Exiled from P without a right of reply

11-17-2017 , 06:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trolly McTrollson
Nice! The memee becomes the memer!
11-17-2017 , 07:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bundy5
Do we not count too that people have been put off from travelling to countries because of this constant threat?
If someone is put off from travelling somewhere because of something they have basically no chance of being affected by, and even in worst case scenarios, have way less chance of experiencing than a car accident on their way to and from the airport while travelling there, then yea... I don't think that should count.

At least not on a poker forum where it's basically all about probabilities.
11-17-2017 , 07:02 PM
11-17-2017 , 07:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by otatop
Do you drive a car?What should we count that as?
We have set up a system of licences to control that. What are we doing about the root cause of terrorism again? Spending billions and billions worth of dollars with further security and these instances still occur. We should just live with that being a facet of our lives now?
11-17-2017 , 07:06 PM
Of course, let's not mention that trivial matter when 3000 people were killed by terrorists in one day. In 2001, I believe it was.

But of course that could never happen. Right?
11-17-2017 , 07:08 PM
Not with a democrat in office, no.

#competence
11-17-2017 , 07:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loki
Not with a democrat in office, no.

#competence
Oh yeah - cause we know what happens to the national security and defence budgets when they take office
11-17-2017 , 07:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bundy5
We have set up a system of licences to control that.
And yet 5 Australians per 100,000 die every year from road deaths. 1,200 people who got in their cars assuming everything would be fine and never got out of it alive.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
Of course, let's not mention that trivial matter when 3000 people were killed by terrorists in one day. In 2001, I believe it was.

But of course that could never happen. Right?
Fairly sure we fixed the whole "fly a plane into a skyscraper" loophole but feel free to point out how we didn't.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bundy5
Oh yeah - cause we know what happens to the national security and defence budgets when they take office
11-17-2017 , 07:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by otatop
And yet 5 Australians per 100,000 die every year from road deaths. 1,200 people who got in their cars assuming everything would be fine and never got out of it alive.
Why don't we add the suicide rate too? Not much we can do about that either is there? **** me with these terrible comparisons. Unless it a guy that intends to drive into someone to kill them and is charged with murder (not criminal negligence or reckless driving causing death), why is this even being compared to deaths caused by terrorists attacks? Unless you are saying that these deaths caused by terrorists are unintended?
11-17-2017 , 07:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bundy5
What body of work? Does someone want to show me this?
Go to search and search all your posts. Read them.
11-17-2017 , 07:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bundy5
Oh yeah? I bet all those hundreds of people that have been killed by terrorist attacks in the West believed that it would never impact on them too, huh? Do we not count too that people have been put off from travelling to countries because of this constant threat?
Math was never your strong suit was it?
11-17-2017 , 08:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bundy5
Why don't we add the suicide rate too? Not much we can do about that either is there? **** me with these terrible comparisons. Unless it a guy that intends to drive into someone to kill them and is charged with murder (not criminal negligence or reckless driving causing death), why is this even being compared to deaths caused by terrorists attacks? Unless you are saying that these deaths caused by terrorists are unintended?
A US citizen should be much, much more concerned about being killed in a spree shooting than in a terrorist action and yet despite your pathetic bitching, we've done much more to try and stop terrorism than we have to control gun violence.
11-17-2017 , 08:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bundy5
Oh yeah - cause we know what happens to the national security and defence budgets when they take office
Yeah, we stop turning foreigners into terrorists by slaughtering their families indiscriminately and behave competently. The horror!
11-17-2017 , 08:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bundy5
Why don't we add the suicide rate too? Not much we can do about that either is there? **** me with these terrible comparisons. Unless it a guy that intends to drive into someone to kill them and is charged with murder (not criminal negligence or reckless driving causing death), why is this even being compared to deaths caused by terrorists attacks? Unless you are saying that these deaths caused by terrorists are unintended?
My point is 1,200 people die from road incidents per year in Australia, compared to the staggeringly huge total of 5 people killed by terrorists since 2014, but you're somehow not terrified to drive somewhere.
11-17-2017 , 08:39 PM
Quite a few imminent attacks have been foiled recently though, including one to blow up a plane.

So the threat is not as minimal as you are trying to make out.

http://www.news.com.au/national/crim...038c0eecce7d80
11-17-2017 , 09:05 PM
It's great they stopped those attacks, but we're talking about 11 foiled attacks in 3 years and 7 successful attacks ever. 5 people killed, 14 wounded. Completely insignificant when talking about a country of 23 million people, and not something that should worry you in any way on a day to day basis if you're not worried about other, much more likely ways of dying like car accidents or falls.
11-17-2017 , 09:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bundy5
What would you like to be called as a collective then?
There's where you go wrong.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MinusEV
Some might argue that it's more rational to debate someone as an individual and based on their expressed opinions instead of as if they were part of a collective and therefore has to share all the opinions that (you think) that collective has.
Exactly.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bundy5
The politics forum has long lost its ability to argue with the individual.
And back to a collective again.

Sigh.
11-17-2017 , 09:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
There's where you go wrong.


Exactly.


And back to a collective again.

Sigh.
It is unfortunate but that is just how it is. If you want it to go back to the individual, change the moderators.
11-17-2017 , 09:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by otatop
It's great they stopped those attacks, but we're talking about 11 foiled attacks in 3 years and 7 successful attacks ever. 5 people killed, 14 wounded. Completely insignificant when talking about a country of 23 million people, and not something that should worry you in any way on a day to day basis if you're not worried about other, much more likely ways of dying like car accidents or falls.
Sure, but being aware that there is a potential threat out there and educating yourself about it is a good thing imo.

Just ignoring it or pretending that it doesn't exist is foolish.
11-17-2017 , 09:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by otatop
It's great they stopped those attacks, but we're talking about 11 foiled attacks in 3 years and 7 successful attacks ever. 5 people killed, 14 wounded. Completely insignificant when talking about a country of 23 million people, and not something that should worry you in any way on a day to day basis if you're not worried about other, much more likely ways of dying like car accidents or falls.
We have agreement. It is good that attacks were stopped.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
There's where you go wrong.


Exactly.


And back to a collective again.

Sigh.
I think it is okay to collectively call the moderators....

Quote:
Originally Posted by bundy5
It is unfortunate but that is just how it is. If you want it to go back to the individual, change the moderators.
Dildos.
11-17-2017 , 09:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat Sklansky
We have agreement. It is good that attacks were stopped.



I think it is okay to collectively call the moderators....



Dildos.
/thread
11-17-2017 , 10:13 PM
adios is a way bigger dildo than any mod I've come across.
11-17-2017 , 10:22 PM
a dildosity?
11-17-2017 , 10:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by bundy5
I have no intention to go back and post in that forum, however I would still like my name cleared.
11-17-2017 , 10:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat Sklansky
We have agreement. It is good that attacks were stopped.



I think it is okay to collectively call the moderators....



Dildos.

      
m