Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
ElliotR needs to be removed as a mod in the politics forum. ElliotR needs to be removed as a mod in the politics forum.

08-06-2010 , 04:05 PM
Standard.
08-06-2010 , 06:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElliotR
No, don't be ridiculous. One guy got banned for run-of-the-mill trolling, one guy got banned for trolling by posting am unsupported conspiracy theory, and one guy got banned for calling another guy a ****ing idiot and noting that
How is asking if the decision would open the door for muslims to marry multiple wives run of the mill trolling?

Why haven't you banned other people for asking the same question?

It seems your standards for banning are if you like the poster he can slide, if you don't like them its an instant ban.
08-06-2010 , 06:36 PM
Pinlifter, I'm curious about your relationship to OP.
08-06-2010 , 06:53 PM
obviously he is one of his wives
08-06-2010 , 07:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2/325Falcon
I look forward to the banning of everyone in the conspiracy thread and the tsunami of butthurt that will wash over us all.
GET ON YA JOB MODS.
08-06-2010 , 07:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cres
The level of buthurtness of the non-banned is the amazing read ITT. All over not being able to press keystrokes to post in an internet message board, oh nos, the horrors.

added.......for the huge time frame of 24 hrs.
This. But that's basically my reaction to any sort of "FREE [INSERT NAME]" Drama.
08-06-2010 , 07:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dids
Anybody else slightly annoyed/bothered that Rapini was a massive no-show in the thread where everybody complained about his moderation of B&M, but shows up to crack jokes in this thread?
Dids for mod!
08-06-2010 , 08:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by gregorio
obviously he is one of his wives
Lock the thread now, because we have a winner.
08-06-2010 , 09:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neuge
Oh please. In that thread SackUp posted something that could only be interpreted as either Judge Walker got the case because a) picking it was his prerogative as chief justice or b)he, in maleficence, rigged the random docket.

Elliot asked him to back it up and after some hemming and hawing, he posted a link to the court's public FAQ page (the FAQs, not even the rules and procedures) that didn't even come close to the assertion he made. It said the chief justice was responsible for enforcing the rules of case assignment in the court. There was absolutely nothing about the chief justice getting his pick of cases.
how is that ban-able?
08-06-2010 , 10:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinlifter
How is asking if the decision would open the door for muslims to marry multiple wives run of the mill trolling?

Why haven't you banned other people for asking the same question?

It seems your standards for banning are if you like the poster he can slide, if you don't like them its an instant ban.
This is a very good question.
08-06-2010 , 10:30 PM
I'll take over for Elliot. New rules: anything goes because politics is a hopeless black-hole into which I fear to delve and accidentally become evil.
08-06-2010 , 10:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pawntificator
I'll take over for Elliot. New rules: anything goes because politics is a hopeless black-hole into which I fear to delve and accidentally become evil.
Nah Pawn, you'd get banned in the first thirty minutes.
08-06-2010 , 10:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CRUDEFINDER
Nah Pawn, you'd get banned in the first thirty minutes.
If he doesn't is his pizza free?
08-06-2010 , 10:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dids
Anybody else slightly annoyed/bothered that Rapini was a massive no-show in the thread where everybody complained about his moderation of B&M, but shows up to crack jokes in this thread?
Probably just you. The users complaining in that ATF thread now have a great thread going in 4L thanks to jmurder3. I couldn't have said anything in the ATF thread that I didn't already say to those users in the B&M thread and via PM.
08-06-2010 , 11:09 PM
ip check?
08-06-2010 , 11:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
I'm not complaining about either. The idea that the Sporting Events forum is really different from the politics forum is a stretch. There's stupid forum drama, petty namecalling, and plenty of butthurt based on people's beliefs. Hell, there's been more stupid SE drama than Politard drama so far this year.

So yeah, politards gonna politards. SE gonna SE.
the difference is that se, like sports, is entertainment. politards are arrogant enough to think they know all the answers to all the problems of the world.
08-07-2010 , 01:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
the difference is that se, like sports, is entertainment. politards are arrogant enough to think they know all the answers to all the problems of the world.
See, this is why Real Housewives of D.C. will be the worst of them all.
08-07-2010 , 02:44 AM
Color me someone perfectly satisfied with the explanation, "Because I'm a mod and so there."
08-07-2010 , 03:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pfapfap
Color me someone perfectly satisfied with the explanation, "Because I'm a mod and so there."
sounds like a fascist
08-07-2010 , 08:00 AM
if i were mod posting in politics would be banworthy
08-07-2010 , 10:59 AM
There's nothing wrong with the politics forum that a few naked pictures of Margaret Thatcher couldn't cure.
08-07-2010 , 12:45 PM
Spoiler:
08-07-2010 , 12:57 PM
Those must be St. George's crosses on her nipples.
08-07-2010 , 01:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
sounds like a fascist
Yeah, so?
08-07-2010 , 01:40 PM
At least it's an ethos.

      
m