Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Congrats to 2+2 on Political Correctness Initiative (complaint about Zeno) Congrats to 2+2 on Political Correctness Initiative (complaint about Zeno)

11-06-2017 , 03:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat Sklansky
that's what she said.
Ban for misogyny.
11-06-2017 , 03:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllCowsEatGrass
So there haven't been any refutations of my point that mods are in effect public representatives of the twoplustwo brand, which leads me to believe that you and Mat agree with this. Are there plans to discuss the relevant posts with Zeno?

And how about augie_ same question here, and in post 170.
you see them that way. no refutation.. i don't see them that way and after 12 years or so am being asked to change my perspective. which i can consider.

still, i would quit this job before demodding augie or zeno over this thread in its current state.

pm mason if you disagree with that stance. he's been bored lately..
11-06-2017 , 03:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
Ban for misogyny.

that's what she said. it never gets old, canadian.
11-06-2017 , 03:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat Sklansky
that's what she said. it never gets old, canadian.
11-06-2017 , 03:57 AM
I was wondering who i could blame on that ***** i'm married to.
11-06-2017 , 04:09 AM
Hey cows eat grass. i got bosses(?) too.

here's my f u to them (mason ain't the reference) he's my friend:

11-06-2017 , 04:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AllCowsEatGrass
I don't know what it means to be "just like the ones that write the letters to the editors in the newspaper."


2:50
11-06-2017 , 05:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Losing all
I wouldn't trade one Zeno for Wookie's 10 best screeching SJWs.
amen, brother
11-06-2017 , 07:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by plaaynde
Wonder who the OP is?

My guess is this: Zeno isn't prepared to change, so he steps down in a week or two after massively many posts itt. Even if this is my bet, I hope to be wrong. I'd like Zeno to be onboard, he has many good qualities.

For an example of a mod who changed positively, take Rapini.
Can't see DS or MM allowing it so no change.
11-06-2017 , 09:14 AM
fwiw I don't think Zeno should be demodded, but this thread should definitely exist. SMP continues to be a forum that not only tolerates, but often encourages sexist and bigoted behavior that should have been stamped out decades ago. It needs to be called out.
11-06-2017 , 09:54 AM
'Tis a silly place.
11-06-2017 , 10:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
fwiw I don't think Zeno should be demodded, but this thread should definitely exist. SMP continues to be a forum that not only tolerates, but often encourages sexist and bigoted behavior that should have been stamped out decades ago. It needs to be called out.
it's worth a lot to me. calling things out is a lot different than demanding they be stamped out from above.
11-06-2017 , 11:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
fwiw I don't think Zeno should be demodded, but this thread should definitely exist. SMP continues to be a forum that not only tolerates, but often encourages sexist and bigoted behavior that should have been stamped out decades ago. It needs to be called out.


You are exaggerating.
11-06-2017 , 11:29 AM
Whenever I read someone wants to 'take charge of culture', I always wonder who put them in charge? Especially when I participate in such a culture and extra when I don't see them around that much being the change they want to see.
11-06-2017 , 11:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobo Fett
Well, I think that really depends on a few things. I'm not going to tell you how you *should* respond because I don't think there's always one right answer. But how I would respond - depending on the situation, I think my response to this is going to vary from directly confronting the guy about it, to talking to the dealer or the floor about it, to leaving the table and playing elsewhere (and reporting it to the floor). I have to confess I'm not as strong at direct confrontation as I probably should be sometimes, so while sitting here in the safe comfort of my home I like to think I'd usually take the first road, but I know when I'm there in the situation I might be taking the second or third option when I could do better. Not that those are necessarily terrible ways to go, but I'd hope that I could show the courage when appropriate.

Edit to add: Having seen your post about sarcastic mocking, yes, I'd probably go a similar route. Sometimes that may shut the guy up, especially if similar sentiments are echoed around the table. But when that has little to no effect, what I've said above applies - now we're getting into uncharted waters where drunk bigot boy may be just as inclined to try to turn this into a physical confrontation as anything else, so there's likely going to be a point where I'm taking a different road.

But this really doesn't directly relate to my post. This isn't someone that just isn't "at exactly the same place when it comes to accepting others", this guy is an out and out bigot. And if I'm at all in doubt about this, it's easy to find out with a few minutes of observation and/or discussion - not nearly so easy to see where someone's coming from in an online discussion, or to make others fully understand your own perspective the way you intend. I'm unlikely to make much impact on how a guy like this thinks, especially while sitting with him at a poker table. And how I deal with him isn't likely to last more than a short time, or be seen by more than a handful of people, as opposed to being part of a discussion that will go on for days, weeks, or months, and be seen and taken part in by hundreds of people.
"Sä oot väärässä" = "You're wrong" would be my response.

Just will not be listening to **** like that.

Last edited by plaaynde; 11-06-2017 at 12:03 PM.
11-06-2017 , 12:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Yeah, he'd probably be a better Politics mod than me, but I like him too much to inflict that on him.
I doubt it, but fortunately between the new job, school, and playing research assistant I'm too busy to be tempted to inflict that sort of pain upon myself right now :P
11-06-2017 , 12:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by well named
I doubt it, but fortunately between the new job, school, and playing research assistant I'm too busy to be tempted to inflict that sort of pain upon myself right now :P
":P"

11-06-2017 , 03:11 PM
A case happening right now in a different social media format has led to a famous social activist musician being banned from the most popular network for sharing art which included a message of bigotry to confront the message of bigotry.

So Janis Ian was banned from social media for counter-bigotry art simply because it included a display of the very bigotry being confronted.

Appearances can be deceiving and it takes I would say practice of human understanding to truly, uh, well-moderate human output. Especially when bigotry is involved because it's particularly stubborn and deceptive sometimes.

Any way keep discussion lines open to find out...
11-06-2017 , 03:50 PM
People sometimes use humor and satire in a similar way. The problem here is that people on the left seem to take everything so literally. Consequently we end up with massive over-reactions and hostility in some cases where maybe a bit more reflection and even (god forbid) acquiring a sense of humor might be in order.
11-06-2017 , 03:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeno
It doesn't matter Howard, the entire religion of Islam is a stinking pile of camel ****.
Please point out the satire for the rest of the class.
11-06-2017 , 04:06 PM
Do you know what "tongue in cheek" is?

Have a look at the post immediately after the one you quoted, if you don't.
11-06-2017 , 04:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noodle Wazlib
Please point out the satire for the rest of the class.


Take writing out of context and act like your in charge. The example you set for the class.
11-06-2017 , 04:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
People sometimes use humor and satire in a similar way. The problem here is that people on the left seem to take everything so literally. Consequently we end up with massive over-reactions and hostility in some cases where maybe a bit more reflection and even (god forbid) acquiring a sense of humor might be in order.


It's not a left-specific thing, but because people are what makes up nebulous groups like "the left"- it's an easy mistake to make.
11-06-2017 , 05:36 PM
11-06-2017 , 05:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
You are exaggerating.
SMP: Not quite as racist as its detractors claim.

      
m