Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Congrats to 2+2 on Political Correctness Initiative (complaint about Zeno) Congrats to 2+2 on Political Correctness Initiative (complaint about Zeno)

12-03-2017 , 08:18 PM
That's good. Laughter is good for the soul.
12-03-2017 , 08:21 PM
Countdown to morph's news conference. Get ready guys for another erudite and insightful slice of political commentary.
12-03-2017 , 08:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
Just read a very interesting book about the Boston marathon bombings and the botched handling of it by the FBI under Bob Mueller. Called "Maximum Harm" by Michelle R. Mcphee.
Hey nobody commented on this book. Highly recommended insight into the case, especially concerning the FBI and their complicity.
12-03-2017 , 08:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbrochu
In any case Spank my post accurately described exactly why he was banned from P, i.e. the same **** he's pulling in this thread, regardless of whatever his true motivation is.


He's been arguing ITT with you and others, and enough of it is about him and what he "is".

Look, you all are arguing about what Sushy "is", together. He argues about what you all "is" too. You belong in an argument forum together, as if.

And, there is no real way to win since Sushy , and the rest here ultimately hold the cards about what we each "is".

It's a set-up for argument that goes on forever or until you you all stop arguing about what each other "is".
12-03-2017 , 08:33 PM
Heard Michelle McPhee talking about this case on the radio and it sounded only slightly more plausible than a 9/11 truther.
12-03-2017 , 08:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbrochu
In any case Spank my post accurately described exactly why he was banned from P, i.e. the same **** he's pulling in this thread, regardless of whatever his true motivation is.
To be fair most of my time in P was defending myself against constant personal attacks, which the mods just ignored of course.

Much of the same in here.
12-03-2017 , 08:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
He's been arguing ITT with you and others, and enough of it is about him and what he "is".

Look, you all are arguing about what Sushy "is", together. He argues about what you all "is" too. You belong in an argument forum together, as if.

And, there is no real way to win since Sushy , and the rest here ultimately hold the cards about what we each "is".

It's a set-up for argument that goes on forever or until you you all stop arguing about what each other "is".
He lost when everybody tired of whatever he "is" and he got exiled from P.
12-03-2017 , 08:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbrochu
Heard Michelle McPhee talking about this case on the radio and it sounded only slightly more plausible than a 9/11 truther.
Really? The book had some pretty glowing testimonials from notable people.
12-03-2017 , 08:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chips Ahoy
You are more likely to be a member of isis than the vegas shooter.

i'm not disagreeing with that. it makes me question how much isis terrorism is a threat at all in this country. they had a perfect opportunity to piggyback on that event and it didn't happen.
12-03-2017 , 08:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerowo
Can you name one good policy that has come from the bah bah bahhh "War On Terror?"
I can't name a resulting policy one way or another. I admit my ignorance on most things.
12-03-2017 , 08:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
Really? The book had some pretty glowing testimonials from notable people.
Like Scott Brown?

She seemed to make an observation and then a bunch of really dubious suppositions from that. Again, this was an interview and I didn't read the book.

In any case, I'll give it to you that this is the Boston office of the FBI so I suppose even if her theories sounded far fetched to me it's hard to rule out anything when it comes to that office.
12-03-2017 , 08:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jbrochu
He lost when everybody tired of whatever he "is" and he got exiled from P.


Orly? He still here arguing with y'all about what he is. So the argument clearly continued to this point and he still not excluded from here.

I don't see what you all have won. If you won not arguing with sushy, why are you here arguing with sushy? To show that all y'alls arguing should have just him banned?

Do note, some posters haven't argued much or at all with sushy about what he is, and the course of those conservations also factor in to any "perfect" description of his posting behavior.
12-03-2017 , 08:54 PM
It's a good read. Whether you agree with it or not. Bob Mueller doesn't come out of it looking very good.
12-03-2017 , 08:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by spanktehbadwookie
Orly? He still here arguing with y'all about what he is. So the argument clearly continued to this point and he still not excluded from here.

I don't see what you all have won. If you won not arguing with sushy, why are you here arguing with sushy? To show that all y'alls arguing should have just him banned?

Do note, some posters haven't argued much or at all with sushy about what he is, and the course of those conservations also factor in to any "perfect" description of his posting behavior.
Pretty sure first I was just here to laugh at Zeno, but then I observed Sushy being Sushy and felt like pointing out to those who don't read P the exact behavior that got him exiled rather than his BS about getting exiled for arguing conservative views.

So sue me I guess for engaging.
12-03-2017 , 08:56 PM
****. I'm trying to talk about politics and everyone is talking about me. What with all the racist, nazi w/e accusations it's pretty hard to keep up. Pretty hard to talk content when you're constantly defending ytourself.
12-03-2017 , 09:01 PM
me me me me me why is everyone talking about meeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee?
12-03-2017 , 09:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat Sklansky
I can't name a resulting policy one way or another. I admit my ignorance on most things.
I can't think of many policies that have been put in place in the name of the war on terror other than making cockpits more secure that have been anything but a way to make life worse for the public while providing little if any security benefit. Nothing Trump has done has made us any safer.
12-03-2017 , 09:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BroadwaySushy
****. I'm trying to talk about politics and everyone is talking about me. What with all the racist, nazi w/e accusations it's pretty hard to keep up. Pretty hard to talk content when you're constantly defending ytourself.
No it isn't you pathetic waste of food. All you have to do is, you know, type the content in your post. When are you going to tell us why Flynn has nothing to do with collusion?
12-03-2017 , 09:17 PM
OK. Two hours time morph. All will be revealed. I've got some urgent business to attend to first.
12-03-2017 , 10:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat Sklansky
wellnamed,

if another politics forum is opened for you to lead, would broadwaysushy be allowed to post there?

if so, what are the chances he would be allowed to stay for an extended period of time? based on his posting in this thread. would you expect him to behave differently?
Come on Mat. I would be the star attraction. Look at how popular I am in this thread.

Last edited by BroadwaySushy; 12-03-2017 at 10:23 PM.
12-03-2017 , 10:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mat Sklansky
I can't name a resulting policy one way or another. I admit my ignorance on most things.
Well for starters now you need a passport for travel between the US and Canada.

There was also massive expansion of the surveillance state and warrantless wiretapping. For a few years we made it SOP to kidnap people in foreign countries and hold them indefinitely in far flung black sites. And we dropped an awful lot of bombs. A few weddings got droned. We ran the national debt up through the ceiling, again. We permanently tarnished our legacy on the world stage and pissed away an awful lot of good will.

Off the top of my head, yeah, there was some policy.
12-03-2017 , 10:33 PM
Quote:
Who Posted?
Total Posts: 921
User Name Posts
BroadwaySushy 116
plaaynde 62
does spamming count as popularity now?
12-03-2017 , 10:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morphismus
That would mean that you somehow deduced that Flynn preparing to testify that Kushner directed him to meet with the Russians has nothing to do with collusion to influence the election; as you didn't indicate you have insider knowledge.

Care to share your thought process?
OK morph, the time has finally arrived to put you (and all the other dummies) out of your misery. Pay attention closely.

Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
Spoiler:
It occurred after the election.
12-03-2017 , 10:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loki
does spamming count as popularity now?


New screen name, same old trick argument.

Mat, these guys deserve a forum together. They just can not stop bull****ting back and forth. Let em.
12-03-2017 , 10:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by zikzak
Well for starters now you need a passport for travel between the US and Canada.

There was also massive expansion of the surveillance state and warrantless wiretapping. For a few years we made it SOP to kidnap people in foreign countries and hold them indefinitely in far flung black sites. And we dropped an awful lot of bombs. A few weddings got droned. We ran the national debt up through the ceiling, again. We permanently tarnished our legacy on the world stage and pissed away an awful lot of good will.

Off the top of my head, yeah, there was some policy.
Well that doesn't sound very good.

I would like, now, for someone to explain why the above doesn't tell the whole story. Why does my visit to Canada require a passport?

Why did I need to jump through hoops to get a "real id" when renewing my license last week?

Did we really have massive expansion of the surveillance state and warrantless wiretapping? Did that make our (US) lives better?

Was kidnapping people the right thing to do in these times? Maybe that didn't happen?

Did we really drop a lot of bombs? Are we happy about them? Maybe some, maybe not others?

Weddings are silly, so that was fine, i'm sure.

National debt? Is that a thing anymore?

And finally, "We permanently tarnished our legacy on the world stage and pissed away an awful lot of good will."

Is that true, on any level? Or do we or should we even care?


I want those questions answered in a nice polite manner.

      
m