Just remember, no one owns a cat - I'll give her some (more) scratches she'll never forget if she tries to claim ownership over this account!

im sure if i guessed 10 accounts i would be right nine times and thats all the live you have lol.

im willing to point out lirva gimmicks for 200 consulting fee plus a month

Now the big question: did/does LirvA/ACEG really have 50 accounts? Or was it a way of expressing "many"?

I would feel my identity splits if having more than one account. Must be vulnerable.

I AM plaaynde, ffs.

i confident he has more than 5 : /

she

I'd like there to be a common word for he/she in English. One day that will come true.

In Finnish that common word is "hän", and has always been. In Swedish it's "hen" instead of "han/hon". "Hen" started to be seen maybe only one decade ago, seems it will take over with time.

Sure they were a troll but others picked up the torches. Not only that but the whole Heather Heyer stuff was disgusting. Come on the personal responsibility banner carrier people need to own some of its getting shutdown. Dont let them off that hook leavesofliberty they own some of P7 getting shutdown. If it was not ACEG it would of been someone else some other time.

That cat needs a diet.

Yeah, ACEG getting credit for single-handedly shutting down P7 is ridiculous.

Not only does she have a bunch of accounts, she also has a boat load of personalties.

Okay, I'll keep that in mind. Thanks for the post.

On a side note, I think a bitcoin/crypto forum where the econ forum was would be beneficial.

She was a major cause of its creation tho.

Bystanders intervened which about as much example for responsibility as can be displayed.

However, as altzis seem to want to get places shut down as much as they want places open to goad, they remain more "kept" when they think they have a place to goad. I don't blame the mods at all. Bystanders intervened at nearly every display of supremacy made in p7 and goaders were made to work for it. It's not our fault or the p7 mods fault the political norm doesn't adjust.

Ah good luck telling supremacists to be responsible- they peddle the act blaming others is if it were responsible.

There already is. Are you new to the language?

This plaaynde person, they don’t know how to use non-gendered terms.

yeah i noticed supremacy is any issue the leftys really care about

its just a parade of shrieking moral superiority. just an excuse to project the bitterness manifesting in to finding targets to hurl hateful insults at

hot topic in the politics section. overt racism, am i right?

nobody cares...


vs panic, screeching, and virtue signalling. follow up on this story if you're interested in hysteria and meltdowns




this forum is echoing the behavior of a campus full of ignorant kids in hysteria. its been caused by moderation and i suspect david sklanskys shared views with those mods

I’ll prove I’m not a racist by linking several videos from noted white nationalist tucker Carlson!

i'll prove im not hysterically hurling labels and outrage by....

You are barking at the wrong tree with narratives so banal I want to hang keys on them or use them to dry my hands.

And really, 2+2 and their associates don't have to put up with anything they don't want, how ever anyone can frame it. Not reason or sense I can detect worth arguing or suspicion beyond that fact about matter.

Hurling labels at leftists and painting them all with the same brush?

Someone err'd by not closing this thread.

I know there is, but it needs to be used too. Isn't "ze" one of them? Could we start using only "ze", for making a good example? When did you see "ze" last time?

When someone was writing bastardized French

I saw a ze last year, In an article about pronouns which referenced academic work which used that standard.

Individuals will usually mention their satisfactory reference if asked and otherwise can state. Right?

Academic standards don't directly address social circumstances- such as the use of assertion and repetition which contradicts a person's or people's openly indicated identity reference.

The act of subsuming another's personal reference with one which comes extra-personally. It's sadly witness-able.

Ze does illustrate for easy individual sense that an option to choose to use which ever of an array of simple words is available and the basis of why one may choose one word over another are all available.

Recap-Pronouns aren't hard and what's hard is having some supremacists think they are in charge of who, what, and why you and me are, infernally. Reminds of the times I banned people from malls.

Go ahead, no one's stopping you.

Of course, first you need someone who even wants to be referred to in that way, so it seems rather a silly question.

What is ze problem exactly?