There's very little in the way of substance so far in the responses. Here's the creme of a failed crop.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Neil S
Steve Sailer is open as a 'race realist.' If you're linking to him you're not allowed to claim you're not racist.
From what you're saying, it follows that Steve Sailer is racist and that anyone linking to or restating positions that could be construed as race realist is also racist, and anything they write in that mode is also racist.
Ok, that's not a great definition, but it's the best one offered so far in this thread. Can I assume this is the definition we're using, since no one else even really bothered to answer the question asked in the OP?
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
Or we could use the old pornography definition "I know it when I see it."
Cool. But that makes you a tyrant quoting a kritarch.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tuma
That which is racially insensitive. Not limited to exploratory diatribes that are aggressive, or deflect to another source.
You may recall from elementary school that it's bad form to use the word or concept being defined or any variant of it in its own definition.
But if you still want to go with that, it's not substantially different from the argument quoted above. What happened with that case, anyway?
******************************************
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
He's blaming all gun violence on blacks and mexicans.
Could you explain how you arrived at that conclusion?
Quote:
So I gave you 6 days. A pittance.
Next time you are probably gone for good.
I'm in the bad habit of occasionally drunk posting strat here. You would probably be doing me and a few other people a big favor.