I guess we've found RJ

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showfl...0&fpart=all

When was he banned?

2 points

1) you suck at RJ spotting

2) why do you care?

Do you think i was serious?

unfortunatly yes

I don't know

It was time for a change

LOL @ NT fanboy. I barely even post in that forum of his anymore since he took over.

I never said anything about the better person, I just wanted to comment that NT had been destroying you in the flame wars here in ATF, what does that have to do with Politics or any other forum, or my opinions of both of you.

You see, I don't necessarily disagree with what you said, but your response shows that you didn't understand the point of my post whatsoever.

BTW, your response to any insult is OMG, I could so pwn you if you posted in Politics. Good for you, you are great at political discussion within the bounds of 2p2, or at least you claim to be since I can't be bothered to read the politics forum on this site (and its not due to lack of interest in politics, I have a Masters in Poli Sci).

ATF and 2+2 has been boring the last week. Plz try harder to help close out Q3 on a high note.

Mike,

I thought about you twice this weekend, having driven to LA and back - there is a Haven Street! Pretty awesome. It must be a balla road because it was worthy of off ramps on both the freeway I took there and the one I took back, which were probably 10-20 miles apart from each other.

Blissfully, there was no BluffTHIS! Boulevard, so he did not come to mind.

plz to be reading the absolute dramabomb?

That's a lot of driving in one weekend...no wonder you're cranky about Ed holding things up at Starbucks...

Thank you, me old cocker!

Strangely, I thought of you while I was watching a very clever tub of lard winning a TV quiz programme.

Posts deleted from NT!'s OOT thread:


BluffTHIS!:

So you are making a thread about OOT in ATF, but which isn't for complaints about OOT? Do you mind if db et al. start a similar thread for best Lounge threads in OOT? Or what if Duds wants a "Best of NVG" thread in OOT, that OK?

Why are you [censored] in MH's sandbox?????????????



tuq:

Bluff,

Here's the difference between you and NT! in this thread: NT! is trying to make the forums a more enjoyable experience for everyone.



BluffTHIS!:

tud,

Let's examine NT's post and this part in particular:

"since some people may have read OOT in the past, but don't check in on it too often anymore"


So he is asking the people whom he ran off from OOT to nominate threads that they most likely haven't read since they no longer stop by often? I can't believe that makes sense even to you. But maybe it does now that you're part of the kool(aid) kid green clique.


tuq:

Come on man, it's like you're mailing in your arguments these days. There are many reasons why people who once frequented that forum no longer visit it. Sure, there are a few good ones who NT! may have chased off, but I'm pretty sure most of them sucked. There is a far larger group of ex-regulars who visit less, or read different forums these days (particularly with the proliferation of OT forums which has eaten at the OOT reader base) who had some great memories of threads that noobs would like to discover for themselves.

This is like your worst nit ever. You should pick your battles more wisely. NT! could cure cancer, broker world peace, and end hunger and poverty and you would bitch about why he didn't do it sooner.


BluffTHIS!:

tuk,

Let me pare the question down without that part then. How much sense does it make to post this in ATF to get responses from posters who don't stop by OOT that often anymore and therefore wouldn't be nearly as likely to be aware of "greatest" threads there?


tuq:

Bluff,

Man you're just making yourself look dumb here. It's so obvious that the only reason you're making this stink is because of the hard-on of hate you have for your (newest) forum nemesis, NT! If this thread had been started by daryn or Nick B. you wouldn't be carrying on like this.

There are plenty of useless threads started in ATF, I don't see you in them rating their necessity.




Spechel EDD:

you oot posters are such whiny cry babies about the simplest stuff

BluffTHIS!:


As long as you do admit that this is a useless thread in ATF, and furthermore silly for the reason I gave (expecting posters who don't read OOT much to know what threads are greatest), then you have a point. But if that's not what you meant, and instead you are just spouting more of your mindless support for anything NT! does, then I would advise you to pull your brown nose out of his butt-crack and take a whiff of fresh air.

punkass:

irony?

Spechel EDD:

bluff this do you even go out or do you constantly refresh atf waiting to see nt!s new post just so you can reply to it?


whats ironic? im not seeing it


tuq:

EDD, seeing as Bluff isn't allowed to post in OOT, you are pretty wrong. Your post count should be rolled back one as that

one was pretty useless.

No I didn't. Are you willfully stupid? I wrote "there are plenty of useless threads", I didn't say that this was one of them.

Dammit man, you're causing us to wreck this thread with your pointless, misguided internet hate. And to even imply that I'm a

relentless NT! apologist is wrong and will not be addressed further.


BluffTHIS!:


Not true. NT!'s attempt to survivor me didn't pan out.


Now how about not ignoring my main point and answer this question: do you think it reasonable to post in ATF in order to get

posters who rarely read OOT to nominate greatest threads in OOT, and thereby think they could even have an informed

opinion? It's a yes or no question.


Spechel EDD:

i really couldnt care less about my postcount tuq. i just dont get why all oot posters seem to care about what a mod on the

INTERNET tells them.



Conspire:

NT! should get his own forum for all the haters. Of course ATF wouldnt be as interesting then.



tuq:

EDD, I think the point of your original post was a pretty lame F OOT-style jab at the posters of the forum. I expect better of

you. But to get worked up like Bluff does about NT! is dumb, yeah.

Yes. For reasons I stated already and which I'm not going to repeat and waste my time stoking the fire of your lame internet

man-hate.



BluffTHIS!:

tuk,

You are still evading the question. All you did previously was try to rationalize why posters leave OOT so as not to have the

primary reason for most be NT! You in no way addressed how infrequent readers of OOT could reasonably be able to know

what what threads there have been the greatest.




Spechel EDD:

i really wasnt trying to take a jab. just because i post in bbv and bbv4l doesnt mean all i do is go "f oot" in my posts. anyone

who sees my posts knows i dont post about that stuff.

what i was trying to say was that i dont understand why this entire forum is filled with so many whiners that think that internet

forums are a democracy.




tuq:


YES I HAVE. GOD.

doucy:

Someone please ban bluffthis. I entered this thread expecting to read through some good OOT threads, but instead I found

him bitching about how much better he is at the internet than everyone else. Quite ghey.


BluffTHIS!:


Oh I see. You mean where you said, "who had some great memories of threads that noobs would like to discover for

themselves."? So NT is asking posters here to nominate old threads from before they left OOT for

whatever-reason-that-positively-100%-has-nothing-to-do-with-NT's-modding?

I get it now. Sorry it took so long. Perhaps though NT! could have added the caveat, "greatest threads from before my

regime". Which of course begs the question whether there have been as many/any "great threads" during his regime.

tuq:

Bluff,

Whatever man. This is getting more ridiculous with every volley. You get the last word. Go.

XXXNoahXXX:

Haven't read rest of this thread, but are you ******ed?

This is comparable to someone posting on my college's alumni board asking for good stories about the college. I may not

have been there in a couple years, but I got some stories that I remember from when I was.

You can't possibly be this dense??


BluffTHIS!:


You ain't from ATF.


Suigin406:

btw, who's in charge of the celebratory thread for bt's 10K post??

Troll Inc:

I'll offer him $100 if he makes his 10,000th post in OOT and it is a very well thought-out and succinct post about how much

NT sucks.


Conspire:

On average how many threads get locked in OOT every week?



XXXNoahXXX:

I'd say only 10-12 threads get locked per week and of them, 7-10 are obviously bad, like just a pic or a link.

Of course the 2-4 where someone thought they had an interesting topic and didn't realize it was a repeat, they were

googletarding, etc., these result in ATF threads of people complaining, so it seems like more.


RunDownHouse:

tuq,

I know you are against ignore and all that, but can you name one way in which reading a BluffTHIS! post has made your life

better or your 2p2 experience better? You should really just go an ignore rampage and see how it feels to live on the other

side.


daryn:

am i the only one who is not really annoyed by bluff?



nath:

Just about. He doesn't even have a point here. He's just trolling.

Anyway, off the top of my head (no time to find links), the Running Oats thread, the Chuddo/Olivia thread, the Banging

Chicks from Myspace thread, and the Lathe thread are my picks. I feel like there are more (and more recent ones), but I can't

think of them.

But probably we should lock this thread and start a new one that BluffThis isn't allowed to immediately derail.

foxw00ds player


And admitting his pushing people away from oot. (HILARIOUS)

"Doctors that smile get sued less often"
and thats all I have to say about that

I dont think he is that dense he is just making a point that NT! is that nitty and douche with locking threads and banning while

himself gets away with doing the same type of thing~! In fact when I read the title I thought to myself NT! is making a joke

mock thread, but I was wrong.


nath:

"Doctors that don't [censored] up don't get sued at all"

mike -

please stop censoring ATF.

thank you.



<font class="small">Code:</font><hr /><pre>
\ /
\ /
\/oluntary
</pre><hr />

Someone has to do it.

Not really .

All,

I was just driving down the street, toggling my Sirius receiver. I saw a Neil Diamond song and nothing personal but kept on surfing. I scrolled to the next station but it stayed on Neil Diamond. HALLO, I SCROLLED U. Turns out they were playing Neil Diamond songs on both the 60s and 70s channels! Girl, You'll Be A Woman Soon on the 60s and I Am, I Said on the 70s. The latter is an underrated song IMO, and it will probably get killed by this pole I'm about to make because of the former's prominent inclusion in Pulp Fiction.

I just realized this would also make a sweet Lounge post. X-post time, baby.

Biff,

That is the most restricted pole I have ever seen. Please redo with sensible options.

tu%,

Those are both awesome songs. Eff the haters tub.

[20:40] Borodog: bbv4l has to be the worst forum in the history of the intarwebs
[20:40] TomCollins: haha yeah
[20:41] Borodog: it's a disaster area
[20:41] TomCollins: it has made OOT so much better
[20:43] TomCollins: interwebs darwing is the best thread
[20:43] Borodog: you know why?
[20:44] Borodog: because drawball is a metaphor of BBV4L
[20:44] TomCollins: haha
[20:44] Borodog: a disaster area where anyone can post anything and [censored] on anything and most of it is [censored] interspersed with a few gems here and there that someone comes along eventually and [censored] all over
[20:44] TomCollins: hahhaha

Did you cut the part of the conversation that says "Seig Heil Ron Paul"?

racist ban, OMI