Why Does Anyone Care About rhe GG Rake Increase When Its Rigged

Two Plus Two Forums Poker News & Discussion Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance

Post Reply Subscribe

...

04-13-2023 , 11:49 PM

pokeridiot222

stranger

Join Date: Mar 2023 Posts: 11

Odds of being dealt Aces/Pocket Pair is 1 every 220 hands .. this is insanely higher and can't be random, not possible

Quote

04-14-2023 , 01:13 AM

ten25

adept

Join Date: Feb 2012 Posts: 1,093

Quote:

Originally Posted by pokeridiot222

Odds of being dealt Aces/Pocket Pair is 1 every 220 hands .. this is insanely higher and can't be random, not possible

There is nothing suspicious about any of those images that I can see.

Looks like a couple of the players had sessions with good card distribution ... so what. Happens to me all the time, as do sessions with bad card distribution.

Quote

04-15-2023 , 04:01 AM

ejames209

veteran

Join Date: May 2016 Posts: 2,698

Because when it's rigged and the rake is higher, you lose your whole account balance even faster.

Quote

04-15-2023 , 04:13 AM

Spud Gun

grinder

Join Date: Aug 2020 Posts: 567

Yeah,you don't understand variance. By this logic, live poker is also rigged - I had aces twice in a row the last time I played. Both times were against the same player with a premium hand.

Quote

04-18-2023 , 09:40 PM

szander

journeyman

Join Date: Apr 2020 Posts: 303

Quote:

Originally Posted by ejames209

Because when it's rigged and the rake is higher, you lose your whole account balance even faster.

Actually losing money is super bad for poker sites. They make their money off of everyone as close to BE as possible, with the small losers only generated through paying rake. That's why pros are bad for a poker site.

Quote

04-28-2023 , 09:54 AM

EhBC

newbie

Join Date: Apr 2023 Posts: 39

More rake is better

Quote

05-15-2023 , 04:27 AM

Vanhaomena

veteran

Join Date: Nov 2008 Posts: 2,048

Okay, what's the real rate then instead of 1/221? I kinda need to know this so I can start exploit folding, if their range is too weighted towards AA due to riggedness. I'd shove KK into [QQ+] but not if the AA is artificially twice as likely. For some reason riggies seem to despise the idea of just using the real world rigged probabilities for their decisions, even though they seem certain of knowing how they differ from a random shuffle.

Quote

Post Reply Subscribe

...