Okay so obviously I'm a massive downswing blah blah blah but I just thought of a cool idea let me know what you think.

Premise: We wager on who run's worse. We get a reputable 3rd party to go over every Hand History from both players Database's and determine who is the winner of the run bad contest.

We will have to pay this 3rd party expert and they have to be very credible. I'm thinking someone that is an expert in DB reviews.

1. The sample can't be massive. I'm thinking 20k hands of 6max NL. That would be the most since it will take the reviewer a long time to go over every hand.

Moderators what do you guys think about this?

Let's turn run bad into fun bad, instead of dreading the run bad we need to embrace. That's the only way we can win.

I would be amazed if you get any traction.

The target demographic is going to be winning players that have played significant volume online.

I think it could be fun. Running bad is almost a point of pride, like you got through something that a lot of people couldn't.

Ideally we would get a pool of players and everyone puts up X buyin. We all pay the 3rd party some fee and then the 3rd party develops some type of system that determines variance.

The All in EV is only one part of running bad. Trackers are so behind in updating metrics like variance, we need a better system.

paging paisting

I said winning players

paisting would be winning if it wasn't their those min raising whales and their suckouts

You don’t want to know what the moderators think about this.

I'll challenge you in all-in 50/50s. I'm 29/88 for 2023. Probability is 0.09%. Sweet.

No one liked this thread the first time mate! Worst bump of the century