Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit?

02-12-2008 , 11:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JEstevam
only bluff i ever use is the continuation bet or a minimum reraise vs a player i'm also certain is stealing the pot or missed their draw

gets better and better
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Quote
02-13-2008 , 12:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JEstevam
what does everyone mean by "is this a level?"
A 'level' is used as a definition of a set-up or a joke to provoke whatever desired group of readers into reacting in a specific way. It seems to be that a poster is thinking on a "higher" or different level, since he actually hopes for AND expects the exact replies he gets. He'll often leave hints or exaggerate somewhere in his post to reveal to experienced posters that it is indeed a 'level'. There's a lot of variations of this and hard to define.

For instance, I can make a thread where the title is "TERRIBLE BAD BEAT" and the content includes a hand history where everybody limps and I have AA in the bigblind and make a minraise to get more money in the pot and not lose any customers. I check/call all streets and openshove the river and get called by the nuts. I then say I was 83% favourite at a point in the hand or whatever. If I then get a lot of sincere replies that say I played the hand poorly and I'm a complete donk etc, I have successfully 'levelled' since that was my intention, to make others feel stupid when they didn't realize it was a joke.

People here think that this thread is a level because they find a lot of the strategical advice very weird and untraditional for solid winning poker
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Quote
02-13-2008 , 12:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JEstevam
what does everyone mean by "is this a level?"
Level?
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Quote
02-13-2008 , 12:24 AM
If so then I was levelled lol & gg!
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Quote
02-13-2008 , 12:33 AM
omg emc such a great gift

i thought it was gimmick but he is seriously defending
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Quote
02-13-2008 , 01:02 AM
this is no "level"

nope i'm not kidding, i don't understand why a tight/passive strategy seems so ridiculous to you people? at micro limit, you don't bluff, you just value bet, value bet, value bet, that's it

i'm also not suggesting i'm at a different level than other people either, all i'm saying is i thought i was general consensus that "playing by the book" and making your own style and adaptations is what "good" poker players do.

if you're all so confident in your poker skills, why haven't i seen you on the wsop yet? show me some results before you try to impress me, put me down.

and if i recalled, many of the top players have both similar and different poker styles, why is everyone here so quick to jump and bash a style?

if this crowd thinks pre flop expectation, and quality starting hands, defines playing well, they are sadly mistaken. A completely different strategy goes for every different play situation and play limit

i did very very well in 25/50 cent hold em, but then had a really bad streak in 5/10 cent limit because i was playing completely different players

i dont need to persuade anyone of my ideas, it's just one of my many styles.. is the idea of having more than 1 poker style sound bad?

I use this same strategy as the beginning of tournaments... and it works very very well... when the blinds are so small (ie cash game) you're safest bet is to only put your money in the pot, when you're a huge favorite (pair over pair, AK vs AQ, atleast 2 to 1 favorite with KK vs AQ for example)

sure you win smaller pots with AA, or you could possibly lose a pot ::gasp::
why do people expect to always win with AA? you know the best way to play AA? find a way to go all in before the flop, and that's exactly what my strategy does, you have any idea how many all in's my AA, KK and AK have been called by? The only time i ever call, and do not have the best hand or AK vs QQ, is if i have KK vs AA.

am i in the tournament section of this forum? does everyone really believe you HAVE to play tight/aggressive?

note: i will fold KK vs someone moving all in with a huge stack if it's safe enough to believe they're a rock or a calling station that never bets without the nuts

Last edited by JEstevam; 02-13-2008 at 01:12 AM.
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Quote
02-13-2008 , 01:07 AM
OP has a bad strategy but he will never lose a lot of big pots... He may win at 2nl, 5nl and 10nl but never higher then that and will never take down a lot of sngs

It works well in tournaments because that's what your supposed to do.

You basically have a no-loss strategy. It doesn't win very much however.
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Quote
02-13-2008 , 01:08 AM
i fold kk preflop if my opponent has aa
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Quote
02-13-2008 , 01:08 AM
How long did it take to write all this up?

This is my favorite:
Quote:
Also a noteable part of my strategy. I will play 54s, 53s, 52s, 43s, 42s, 32s and their non-suited counter parts with many limpers, especially in position. People look at starting hands the wrong way, ie - which is most likely to win the pot. My theory is to pick hands that when they win, they win a NICE pot.
Forget them ugly pots I win playing PP's + broadways. Stacking people with 52o is where the money is.
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Quote
02-13-2008 , 01:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JEstevam
this is no "level"

nope i'm not kidding, i don't understand why a tight/passive strategy seems so ridiculous to you people? at micro limit, you don't bluff, you just value bet, value bet, value bet, that's it

i'm also not suggesting i'm at a different level than other people either, all i'm saying is i thought i was general consensus that "playing by the book" and making your own style and adaptations is what "good" poker players do.

if you're all so confident in your poker skills, why haven't i seen you on the wsop yet? show me some results before you try to impress me, put me down.

and if i recalled, many of the top players have both similar and different poker styles, why is everyone here so quick to jump and bash a style?

if this crowd thinks pre flop expectation, and quality starting hands, defines playing well, they are sadly mistaken. A completely different strategy goes for every different play situation and play limit

i did very very well in 25/50 cent hold em, but then had a really bad streak in 5/10 cent limit because i was playing completely different players

i dont need to persuade anyone of my ideas, it's just one of my many styles.. is the idea of having more than 1 poker style sound bad?

I use this same strategy as the beginning of tournaments... and it works very very well... when the blinds are so small (ie cash game) you're safest bet is to only put your money in the pot, when you're a huge favorite (pair over pair, AK vs AQ, atleast 2 to 1 favorite with KK vs AQ for example)

sure you win smaller pots with AA, or you could possibly lose a pot ::gasp::
why do people expect to always win with AA? you know the best way to play AA? find a way to go all in before the flop, and that's exactly what my strategy does, you have any idea how many all in's my AA, KK and AK have been called by? The only time i ever call, and do not have the best hand or AK vs QQ, is if i have KK vs AA.

am i in the tournament section of this forum? does everyone really believe you HAVE to play tight/aggressive?
This hurt my eyes

Ban IMO
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Quote
02-13-2008 , 01:12 AM
max buy in for 1/2 cent = $2.00, i normally buy in for .60-1.00 and play a very basic super aggressive style of play, where i either raise or reraise preflop only. obviously when your stack gets shorter you lower your standards and add medium/small pairs, or suited connectors that are unlikely to be dominated.

If i were to buy in at 2.00, and it gets to be with KK i'd bet the size of the pot, if i was reraised, i'd be suspicious and either call/fold if coming from a big stack. from a smaller stack you call 100% obviously.

so i'll usually gamble around $1.00 on KK (50 bb), but if i'm up to $2 and a player i have marked as a rock reraises me
i call if we both have lots of chips afterwards, or i fold if i can't push all in thinking they definately have AQ, QQ, JJ, or TT. You can call or fold, personally i dont like making even a reraise with KK against only 1 player.

If there are other players, limpers, and it will isolate, of course i'll reraise, but if it's heads up and my opponent either has AA, AK, AQ, QQ, JJ, or why not take a flop and see it from there.

Perhaps my problem is i focus on being a post flop specialist, and i have a bunch of pre flop specialist ramming down my throat.
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Quote
02-13-2008 , 01:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gorilla Boy
This hurt my eyes

Ban IMO
wtf is this? nazi germany? banning someone for having different views than you? christ.
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Quote
02-13-2008 , 01:14 AM
I'm sure you are quite the postflop specialist and I would love to hear your strategy for that
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Quote
02-13-2008 , 01:18 AM
predeal specialist imo
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Quote
02-13-2008 , 01:18 AM
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Quote
02-13-2008 , 01:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nihil2501
lol.
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Quote
02-13-2008 , 01:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JEstevam

remember all those times you lose to the "idiot" loose-aggressive player who was skilled enough to come out a winner plaing 33-50% of the pots

i remember getting this exact same response when i went to turning stone for the 1st time playing my super aggressive super loose approach, funny, i bought in with 100, and left with 450, also i recall getting 1 person who sounds quite familiar of this crowd to buy back in 3 times. until he moved to another table



i'll assume none of you respect loose aggressive play either... unless it comes from phil ivey right??
Quote:
max buy in for 1/2 cent = $2.00, i normally buy in for .60-1.00 and play a very basic super aggressive style of play
[ ] Tight passive.
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Quote
02-13-2008 , 01:26 AM
i'm wrong, you're right -- do you all feel better now? need another pat on your back or boost for you ego? where do i find the forum where people actually talk and swap ideas, instead of the forum of people who think they are superior to you?
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Quote
02-13-2008 , 01:28 AM
Do you use Poker Tracker? If so, I'd love to see a screen shot of your stats.
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Quote
02-13-2008 , 01:28 AM
Poor guy's just trying to help you guys out. Give him a break.
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Quote
02-13-2008 , 01:31 AM
This happens to every newbie at 2+2, I remember my first post and how mad I felt when I got flamed.
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Quote
02-13-2008 , 01:33 AM
OP did say this was best strategy for microlimits to be fair.
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Quote
02-13-2008 , 01:33 AM
It's like a frat! Hazing and all.
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Quote
02-13-2008 , 01:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The 13th 4postle
This happens to every newbie at 2+2, I remember my first post and how mad I felt when I got flamed.
But did you get flamed anywhere near as hard as this guy is?
Tight Passive best strategy in micro-limit? Quote

      
m