Quote:
Originally Posted by redCashion
Dusty is table selection really a huge part of your game when you are getting in 150k hands a month? It seems like you must be playing at less than ideal tables a fair amount just to get that many hands in.
I do what I can, but you are right in that I am often sitting in a table or two or three that isn't that good. A lot of people think that my high WR is attributable to good game selection, but at the same time that I will admit my game selection is strong, I am also ten tabling which is definitely a WR killer.
I game select well only in that I won't sit if everyone is a pro or the only spot is like 1/3 stacked and I would be OOP on him. Sadly, the games are very tough at 10/20 and up. Even the spots are often not really that terrible. If there is a player that has at least 1/2 a buy in at 10/20 or 25/50 and he isn't a pro, I will generally sit. So if that makes me a game selection nit then so be it. I just feel like I have better things to do with my time than pass money around with a bunch of other pros and pay rake while I do it. I have no idea why people do this. I often hear from them that the reason is that they want to play against the best to improve their game. I have played tens of thousands of hands with most of the best players in the world and have learned from them, but I just make sure a fish is there. You don't have to play only against the best to challenge yourself against the best. Anyway, that's my little rant on that.