STOP OVERPLAYING POCKET PAIRS AND WHINING WHEN YOU LOSE WITH THEM!1!!1
12-19-2010
, 07:42 PM
12-20-2010
, 03:19 PM
Lee
12-20-2010
, 03:23 PM
04-17-2011
, 03:19 PM
04-18-2011
, 01:52 PM
Cliff notes, if I understand the discussion correctly:
jman220 is NOT Galfond.
Galfond IS jman220.
Got it!
Lee
jman220 is NOT Galfond.
Galfond IS jman220.
Got it!
Lee
05-24-2011
, 04:40 PM
[QUOTEQuote:
You say 3:1 fav to improve for overcards -- haven't you ignored the fact that the pocket pair doesn't have to improve to win or is this thread a joke? It seems like all the threads under this topic have some underlying sarcasm to them...
You're an idiot. You clearly don't understand meta-game concepts like the ones described by my thread. OMG I HAVE LIKE 1600 POSTS AND YOU HAVE 70, STFU NOOB.][/QUOTE]
70 intelligent posts > 1600 idiotic ****** posts
You say 3:1 fav to improve for overcards -- haven't you ignored the fact that the pocket pair doesn't have to improve to win or is this thread a joke? It seems like all the threads under this topic have some underlying sarcasm to them...
You're an idiot. You clearly don't understand meta-game concepts like the ones described by my thread. OMG I HAVE LIKE 1600 POSTS AND YOU HAVE 70, STFU NOOB.][/QUOTE]
70 intelligent posts > 1600 idiotic ****** posts
05-24-2011
, 05:10 PM
Quote:
[QUOTEQuote:
You say 3:1 fav to improve for overcards -- haven't you ignored the fact that the pocket pair doesn't have to improve to win or is this thread a joke? It seems like all the threads under this topic have some underlying sarcasm to them...
You're an idiot. You clearly don't understand meta-game concepts like the ones described by my thread. OMG I HAVE LIKE 1600 POSTS AND YOU HAVE 70, STFU NOOB.]
You say 3:1 fav to improve for overcards -- haven't you ignored the fact that the pocket pair doesn't have to improve to win or is this thread a joke? It seems like all the threads under this topic have some underlying sarcasm to them...
You're an idiot. You clearly don't understand meta-game concepts like the ones described by my thread. OMG I HAVE LIKE 1600 POSTS AND YOU HAVE 70, STFU NOOB.]
[/QUOTE]LOl, years go by and people still dont know this is Phil "f!@king" Galfond aka OMG Clay Aiken....now do you think this is a level?
05-24-2011
, 07:31 PM
05-25-2011
, 02:59 AM
One more time, for those who haven't read the thread:
A pocket pair has only 2 outs to improve.
2 undercards have 6 outs to improve.
Thus, the undercards are a 6 to 2, simplified to 3 to 1, favorite over the pocket pair!!
Math is easy.
Lee
A pocket pair has only 2 outs to improve.
2 undercards have 6 outs to improve.
Thus, the undercards are a 6 to 2, simplified to 3 to 1, favorite over the pocket pair!!
Math is easy.
Lee
05-25-2011
, 04:45 AM
06-16-2011
, 02:44 PM
06-16-2011
, 02:48 PM
