Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainBusto
oh, i take that back.
i think you misread the screenshot. you are credited in full for your total prize sum of zero dollars for those freerolls.
I am not talking about zero dollars thing(well in a way I was since I have cashed in tourneys that I havent gotten credit for thus my total prize sum of zero dollars is off and wrong)
I am talking about how yor rank out of 700,000 online players,should be based on getting credit for almost cashing and how far u go deep into a tourney and how well u play should be measured and should give credit for rank among 700,000 players.
If that were the case that OPR did that(and it doesnt do that)then instead of being ranked at about 199,000 out of 700,000 over the last 5 years since 2003,I would be ranked something like 50,000 to 100000 out of 700,000 over those 5 years.Thus is the reason why OPR isnt accurate.
OPR is only accurate as a measure of how good a player is when a player deposits 1k each and every year,and plays in a lot of real money buy in tourneys year after year,and then is ranked accordingly to how well that player did over those years.
OPR is not a good measurement of how good or bad freerollers and very small microstakes players,because of all the variance and bad luck people usually experience at those freeroll and microstakes levels.
Mike DH