It's like you have a prop bet where you have to make yourself look as dumb as possible ITT. Just really impressive stuff.

After reviewing again how VPPs are earned in relation to rake, if OP kept playing even as the 6-max tables dwindled down to fewer players, then he would gain a greater share of the 5.5 VPPs allocated to the $1 of rake as the number of players is reduced. 3-handed he's getting 1.83 VPP per hand where the pot hits $20, and heads-up he gets 2.75 VPP. I assumed that every hand he played was 5-6 handed, and that obviously wasn't the case.

I was interested in learning exactly how profitable this venture was for OP, and thought I'd share my work. I don't understand why it's not OK for people to make mistakes in figuring out stuff, this is fun for me. Just because a post doesn't cheerlead for OP doesn't mean the poster is sad, negative, or hateful necessarily. Whether OP is a narcissistic jerk or not did not impact on why I chose to calculate his profits and it didn't impact the tone with which I posted it. Just roughly double the VIP rewards and you get the idea...it was a fun exercise for me to learn more about the PS VIP program in the process, but I'm not going to refigure the exact VIP amount.

Avg players at tables: 5,6.
I guess my stats are a little bit off regarding the VPPs etc. I played some plo 2/4 and 10/20 in the middle of the prop bet.

what were your vpip/pfr/3bet/agg factor?
ty

+1

Yes, it's a bit lower as your calculations but it's very close to accurate.. I get around 1,01 vpp per hand at PLO200 6max.. So you probably got around 121k vpp's (little less or more depending on play style) for your 119,743 hands at PLO200..