Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkDavis
Regarding this, if you feel there is an issue with game integrity, gather the evidence you have and forward it to in this case the regulator the "Isle of Man Gambling Supervision Commission". If your concerns haven't been met satisfactorily then it would be wise to stop playing there.
No point in continuing on a site you can't trust.
I feel like this is the cheap answer that doesn't address legitimate concerns when they do arise.
I don't think the poster is correct in this instance, based on what occurred; but....doesn't mean he's not accidentally correct about something that's been claimed by many users for years.
Blindly believing a site is on the up and up is just as silly as blindly believing they're using house bots. Evidence is needed, sure, but the burden of evidence is so damn high that barring an immense hand history, it'd be very hard to provide much evidence at all.
Some users even state that hand history isn't enough, because 'we're all too dumb to know how to analyze HH'. Let's assume they are correct; almost everyone here is capable of hiring a mathematician to perform the math on a level that can't be denied.
I don't know one way or the other; but if I'm being honest; if I ran a website that hosted poker; you bet your ass I'm using house bots if I can get away with it. You know what's better than a boatload of money? Two boatloads of money.
Let me put it another way; if the website I play on said "Hey, we want you to play as a house player; you'll have xyz privelege" ---- I'm taking that deal even if it's a potripper scenario. You can cry morality all you want; but I like money more than I like morals. I'd probably wait for the website to go defunct before ever telling anyone.