Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Phil Ivey vs Daniel negranue heads up.If the loser was going to die, who do you think Phil Ivey vs Daniel negranue heads up.If the loser was going to die, who do you think

05-01-2008 , 10:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mn1000
Well for this to realistically happen they would have to eliminate the luck factor and miracle suckouts. They would have to have a rule like if they went all in, then the chips will be instantly shared out in terms of the amount of equity they each have in the pot. For example if it was 60/40 one player would recieve 60% of the pot and the other one 40%.
The game would never end DUCY?
Phil Ivey vs Daniel negranue heads up.If the loser was going to die, who do you think Quote
05-02-2008 , 12:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmj
The game would never end DUCY?
Lawls.

L2bet into the nuts and have 0 equity.
Phil Ivey vs Daniel negranue heads up.If the loser was going to die, who do you think Quote
05-02-2008 , 12:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LotsOfOuts69
Phil wouldnt play his A game at such low stakes. Maybe if they bumped it to eternal damnation, then Phil would have a big edge.
lmao, A+
Phil Ivey vs Daniel negranue heads up.If the loser was going to die, who do you think Quote

      
m