That's completely different than this.

If some guy made a bet saying he can play 2M hands in a month with no other rules specified, it is 100% ok for him to play play money and fold every hand and it is 100% not ok for people betting against him to sit at his tables and time down. The standard spirit of the bet in these "I bet I can do this" props is that they're betting they can do it without interference.

If you don't buy that argument, though, you can read the rules of the bet. Rule 2 that I quoted says quite clearly that bettors can't interfere.


(I haven't read much of this thread... Was just lniked here by someone else. It's possible that I'm missing something.)

This is logically flawed. If what is outside the brackets did not matter you would only have what is inside the brackets in the sentence.

quoted so you can't edit

fees, this is pretty lame

nvm, fail

Guys,

I have two kids at home with the flu, I'm leaving work now, and I'll be back on later tonight. I'd appreciate it if you wait for me to post before you go spam this in other forums/threads.

Thanks.

f5f5f5f5f5

how about blocking fees tables if the judge rules out in his favour.

what part of fees intentions to win 50 ugl dont affect the bet??

there is no grey area here, his intentions are to win ugl so silent one loses the bet

direct intent there....

priorities man. take ur time. fix them kids.

and hopefully you learned about socks too, right?

whats outside the brackets is explicitly defined by what is inside.

and that delightful story about my mile walk prop bet gone wrong, was only brought up to elaborate on why you need to cover all of your bases in a bet.

Is it okay if I keep repeating what a cheating, scamming POS Fees is and how I hope this ruins his coaching career and he gets bumhunted until busto? I will keep it to this thread.

this * 1000

King Fish, i like ur posts. if u were a fine woman i´d come for ya.

omg, going to sleep now, bet i have to read 250+ new posts tomorrow.

are you saying fee goes by the philosophy of eat or be eaten?

It's because we share that German sense of humor.

According to the rules and the spirit of the bet, there is no problem with fees playing nl50hu and going for the propbet. He's still obviously a dog and started later, but he in no way affects silent's play at the tables. If there was something shady going on that would be different, but he's just grinding it out. With fees only playing hu, he cannot be possibly be interfering with silent playing. The clause in the rules implies people stalling at the op's tables and/or people gunning for him and trying to take his money affect the table he's at.

Next,


This is the person who bet with fees. Silent if this is you, what other action and **** have you done on random or different 2p2 accounts? If you were going to take another $25k against you why not do it under your own 2p2 name? I had no idea you had more then $40k against you and neither did kerpowski.

And apparently this guy/you bet against you in the nl100 bet and now bet with/for you in this prop bet? And "the_most"/you blocking fees tables...

At first I just thought that you were either insane luckboxing or just ****ing destroying nl50, but tbh the likelihood that something fishy is going on in my mind is increasing.

Is the_most one of the people sitting in the room with you while you play?

gl

FURTHERMORE, Silent didn't even make the propbet with Fees.

Deleted my old post to make this unarguable.

fair a : marked by impartiality and honesty : free from self-interest, prejudice, or favoritism

So who is for forfeiting the 25k of fees by current actions?

naw. i dont think he affects the bet by playing HU tables unless he is ahead of silentone at some point

i lol´d again. getting a boner.

if the majority of unbiased/not busto members of the poker community deem it unethical, then it is. until that happens all you have is crappy rules in place.

except only 2 of the 3 examples given are cheating the game of poker

ghosting/coaching players is not cheating but is apparently against the spirit of the rules of this prop bet

because he didn't affect silent's play or results I think he might get away with this.
but just for fun I would love that he loses, and give this kid a bonus for the effort and the good heart he has.

valid point

ghosting has already been determined to be really unethical by everyone, but since you can't prove it you just shrug and move on.