Is this another Briro gimmick Mr Folding? I believe I may have sniffed this out.

Well, that's a good one. If it is, Spinoza, Nietzsche, Desartes, Hobbes, Schopenhauer, etc. aren't bad company. To it I'll add Jung, Branden, Tielhard, McKenna, Bohr, Bohm ... for now.

wtf are you even saying

look up ten levels ... or at least try googling.

No no I get what you're TRYING to say

but you're not a significant figure. Like...at all. You're just contained here.

I didn't cite myself in the list. By the way, are you a Trump voter? Your functioning with language is dangerously close to that level.

Using the passive voice and deliberately utilizing grammar errors?

I think you have a failed grasp of the use of language.

No and no. I don't give a damn about grammar on here, but am referring to much deeper fundamental uses of language. Really, good luck with that tack.

I am simply recording a run of freaky hands and situations, someone said, fascinatingly, possibly motored by conatus. Saying it isn't happening is just BS. Saying I have no grasp is a Trumpian use of language, which is the attempt to declare things into truth that are obviously false, this as a basic strategy when you come up against difficulty in your positions. Thus the reference to fundamental uses of language.

Let's stop. I don't think you play this game well. And, obviously, I don't play hold'em well. But the insanity of these hands doesn't help and produces some venting here and there.

OHHHHHH you're one of those condescending types that really loves the philosophy bull****.

Congratulations, you played yourself. Also, Trump is a contemporary. If you think you're so smart why can't you cite someone who did a much better job...maybe McCarthy?

**** yourself you lazy piece of ****.

**** you op

One of these two statements is true, and suggesting we stop playing a game that I would never have started is assuming that there's truth to a falsity.

So it seems you're the worst kind of hypocrite. Good work OP! See my colleague's statement below in case you missed anything important.

I bet OP thinks this is some sort of joke. BBV just some whining/dumping ground for bad NLHE players.

Sorry, bucko. You're in the WRONG place.

**** you OP

well that's kind of naked ... lack of a clue on psycho-linguistics tends to do that so no surprise ... still, colossally naked.

Meanwhile, continuing in a non-idiotic direction, notice the question "Why?" in the thread title is not, "Why me?" Part of that answer is the conatus angle, which is very illuminating potentially because to the extent it is self-perpetuating or an inclination on the subject's part, the fact that the supporting hands continue says something profound about "I and reality," in the area metaphysics. Then again maybe it should be closed to protect homies.

tl;dr because at most you might have taken psych 101.

ITT OP is trying to prove his intellectual superiority over BBV
**** you OP
https://www.reddit.com/r/iamverysmart/

Everything swirling around me weird ... straight flush losers, lightning strikes, Jungian mysteries. That's who I am, I don't apologize ... that's my life. Ha.

Tonight flop a wheel to 2-3 of diamonds on Ac-4d-5d flop. Turn 6d I make the straight flush. King flush betting into me, THREE ACES over-calling. An ace is the bad beat. Alas no ace, no pair. Good pot, pairing the board would have been great pot. In PLO I flop to 6c-7c-8h-10h, a practical no win hand that some would have got involved in: flop 8c-10s-Qs. Threw it away, pot got monster, I took two runners 7c-4c to a straight flush, had I played. Some gin is surfacing in the flops after 3 years of inexplicable death runouts.

I thought maybe I should be back in the hold'em game with this straight flush stuff circling me. Geared down to about an hour of 1-2. See if I can get a straight flush beat again or beat quads with one. Not tonight.

Anyway, my two plays this week +323 and + 343, both palindromes (something I have an eye for), adding up to 666. Doo-doo-doo-doo. Conatus with results that support it everywhere I look. Why would that happen? Back to "I and reality," a subset of "self and reality." It knows who I am. It knows exactly what it's doing. It is what it is. Deal.

OP be honest
Do you really think someone reads your posts?

**** you OP

^

Now Gaga's "bad beats" are colossal
At least it seems to this old fossil
The baddest of luck
His suck-outs all suck
His fate seems to be albatross-al