Quote:
Originally Posted by Nate.
FlyWF--
I think that if you spend time in BBV ridiculing funny hands, you should be prepared to take some heat. That said, you're more than welcome to look through the archives for ridiculously bad stuff I've posted. (On the other hand, I started posting here on the Stud forum in 2003, so it might be a little harder to detect the cluelessness.)
All my best,
--Nate
You're missing the point. You're actually missing several points:
Taking heat is fine, even Gildwulf's scarily insecure "look through posting history" tactic is just being mean, but taking heat for
asking a stupid question about poker? That's just ******ed, given that these forums are ostensibly for asking stupid questions about poker.
I'm not going to look through your posting history to find something stupid you said because that's a ****ty move to pull and I'm better than that. While it's the lesser of Gildwulf's sins the blatant
ad hominem **** reeks of desperation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gildwulf
It encourages people to think twice before piling on one sentence comments about something they have no ****ing clue about (poker).
I meant you're encouraging people to post hands that are a "BRAG" because villain played poorly. Imagine how many 19 years are playing $3 SNGs right. Imagine how many of their opponents are missing bets on the river, slowplaying vulnerable hands, folding to bluffs, etc. etc.
Burcak- There is a big difference between "this hand isn't that funny" and "you suck for posting this not very funny hand".