How to loose a 400BB pot on a runner runner
11-09-2017
, 06:10 PM
Well you can only laugh right...
Get a dream flop and when I see that the both have KK I can't believe my luck. Well...
PokerStars - $0.50 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4
BTN: 503.38 BB (VPIP: 18.22, PFR: 13.94, 3Bet Preflop: 5.41, Hands: 556)
SB: 809.6 BB (VPIP: 80.00, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 5)
BB: 99.24 BB (VPIP: 23.19, PFR: 16.23, 3Bet Preflop: 3.81, Hands: 1,106)
UTG: 128.36 BB (VPIP: 21.30, PFR: 10.06, 3Bet Preflop: 8.57, Hands: 174)
Hero (MP): 130.12 BB
CO: 317.18 BB (VPIP: 25.55, PFR: 19.46, 3Bet Preflop: 7.03, Hands: 609)
SB posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB
Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has 6
7
UTG raises to 2 BB, Hero raises to 9 BB, CO raises to 24 BB, fold, fold, fold, UTG calls 22 BB, Hero calls 15 BB
Flop: (73.5 BB, 3 players) 6
6
9
UTG checks, Hero checks, CO bets 25 BB, UTG calls 25 BB, Hero raises to 106.12 BB and is all-in, CO raises to 293.18 BB and is all-in, UTG calls 79.36 BB and is all-in
Turn: (390.1 BB, 3 players) 9
River: (390.1 BB, 3 players) 9
Hero shows 6 7 (Full House, Nines full of Sixes)
Main Pot [386.58 BB]: (Pre 25%, Flop 96%, Turn 95%)
Side Pot#1 [3.52 BB]: (Pre 26%, Flop 96%, Turn 95%)
CO shows K K (Full House, Nines full of Kings)
Main Pot [386.58 BB]: (Pre 38%, Flop 4%, Turn 2%)
Side Pot#1 [3.52 BB]: (Pre 74%, Flop 4%, Turn 5%)
UTG shows K K
(Full House, Nines full of Kings)
Main Pot [386.58 BB]: (Pre 37%, Flop 0.2%, Turn 2%)
UTG wins 191.3 BB
CO wins 194.8 BB
Get a dream flop and when I see that the both have KK I can't believe my luck. Well...
PokerStars - $0.50 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4
BTN: 503.38 BB (VPIP: 18.22, PFR: 13.94, 3Bet Preflop: 5.41, Hands: 556)
SB: 809.6 BB (VPIP: 80.00, PFR: 0.00, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 5)
BB: 99.24 BB (VPIP: 23.19, PFR: 16.23, 3Bet Preflop: 3.81, Hands: 1,106)
UTG: 128.36 BB (VPIP: 21.30, PFR: 10.06, 3Bet Preflop: 8.57, Hands: 174)
Hero (MP): 130.12 BB
CO: 317.18 BB (VPIP: 25.55, PFR: 19.46, 3Bet Preflop: 7.03, Hands: 609)
SB posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB
Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has 6
7 UTG raises to 2 BB, Hero raises to 9 BB, CO raises to 24 BB, fold, fold, fold, UTG calls 22 BB, Hero calls 15 BB
Flop: (73.5 BB, 3 players) 6
6 9 UTG checks, Hero checks, CO bets 25 BB, UTG calls 25 BB, Hero raises to 106.12 BB and is all-in, CO raises to 293.18 BB and is all-in, UTG calls 79.36 BB and is all-in
Turn: (390.1 BB, 3 players) 9
River: (390.1 BB, 3 players) 9
Hero shows 6
7 (Full House, Nines full of Sixes)Main Pot [386.58 BB]: (Pre 25%, Flop 96%, Turn 95%)
Side Pot#1 [3.52 BB]: (Pre 26%, Flop 96%, Turn 95%)
CO shows K
K (Full House, Nines full of Kings)Main Pot [386.58 BB]: (Pre 38%, Flop 4%, Turn 2%)
Side Pot#1 [3.52 BB]: (Pre 74%, Flop 4%, Turn 5%)
UTG shows K
K (Full House, Nines full of Kings)Main Pot [386.58 BB]: (Pre 37%, Flop 0.2%, Turn 2%)
UTG wins 191.3 BB
CO wins 194.8 BB
sick run out!
11-09-2017
, 06:22 PM
11-10-2017
, 02:08 AM
11-10-2017
, 04:17 AM
11-10-2017
, 09:12 AM
11-10-2017
, 09:50 AM
11-10-2017
, 02:00 PM
PokerStars - $0.50 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has 6 7
Hero raises to 9 BB, Hero calls 15 BB
Hero loses massive pot.
Hero writes post about how unlucky he is.
Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has 6
7 Hero raises to 9 BB, Hero calls 15 BB
Hero loses massive pot.
Hero writes post about how unlucky he is.
: 7
11-10-2017
, 06:06 PM
Ok so this post wasn't about complaining about my bad luck but I thought it was a little bit funny (although it made me sad 
. )and I think it is a pretty unlikely runout that would be interesting.
Would like to make a comment on preflop nevertheless since it seems to irritate people.
3-betting 67s is standard I think. I 3 bet 67s 50% and against some opponents I 3-bet them 100%. I agree that the call is very high variance but I am surprised that so many people seem to think it is outright bad. If you have a small bankroll you should definitely fold but if you can cope with the variance I think its a call.
I close the action preflop and I also have the best relative position Postflop which means I can check raise if the flop is good for me. I need about 20% equity to call and if I give my opponents a really tight range I have 27%.
I know that SC plays best when the SPR is high and in this case it would be <2 which means that fold equip is close to zero if the have any hand. Nonetheless I think the call is just fine.
. )and I think it is a pretty unlikely runout that would be interesting.Would like to make a comment on preflop nevertheless since it seems to irritate people.
3-betting 67s is standard I think. I 3 bet 67s 50% and against some opponents I 3-bet them 100%. I agree that the call is very high variance but I am surprised that so many people seem to think it is outright bad. If you have a small bankroll you should definitely fold but if you can cope with the variance I think its a call.
I close the action preflop and I also have the best relative position Postflop which means I can check raise if the flop is good for me. I need about 20% equity to call and if I give my opponents a really tight range I have 27%.
I know that SC plays best when the SPR is high and in this case it would be <2 which means that fold equip is close to zero if the have any hand. Nonetheless I think the call is just fine.
11-11-2017
, 04:12 AM
Quote:
Ok so this post wasn't about complaining about my bad luck but I thought it was a little bit funny (although it made me sad . )and I think it is a pretty unlikely runout that would be interesting.
Would like to make a comment on preflop nevertheless since it seems to irritate people.
3-betting 67s is standard I think. I 3 bet 67s 50% and against some opponents I 3-bet them 100%. I agree that the call is very high variance but I am surprised that so many people seem to think it is outright bad. If you have a small bankroll you should definitely fold but if you can cope with the variance I think its a call.
I close the action preflop and I also have the best relative position Postflop which means I can check raise if the flop is good for me. I need about 20% equity to call and if I give my opponents a really tight range I have 27%.
I know that SC plays best when the SPR is high and in this case it would be <2 which means that fold equip is close to zero if the have any hand. Nonetheless I think the call is just fine.
. )and I think it is a pretty unlikely runout that would be interesting.Would like to make a comment on preflop nevertheless since it seems to irritate people.
3-betting 67s is standard I think. I 3 bet 67s 50% and against some opponents I 3-bet them 100%. I agree that the call is very high variance but I am surprised that so many people seem to think it is outright bad. If you have a small bankroll you should definitely fold but if you can cope with the variance I think its a call.
I close the action preflop and I also have the best relative position Postflop which means I can check raise if the flop is good for me. I need about 20% equity to call and if I give my opponents a really tight range I have 27%.
I know that SC plays best when the SPR is high and in this case it would be <2 which means that fold equip is close to zero if the have any hand. Nonetheless I think the call is just fine.
11-11-2017
, 04:16 AM
Quote:
Ok so this post wasn't about complaining about my bad luck but I thought it was a little bit funny (although it made me sad . )and I think it is a pretty unlikely runout that would be interesting.
Would like to make a comment on preflop nevertheless since it seems to irritate people.
3-betting 67s is standard I think. I 3 bet 67s 50% and against some opponents I 3-bet them 100%. I agree that the call is very high variance but I am surprised that so many people seem to think it is outright bad. If you have a small bankroll you should definitely fold but if you can cope with the variance I think its a call.
I close the action preflop and I also have the best relative position Postflop which means I can check raise if the flop is good for me. I need about 20% equity to call and if I give my opponents a really tight range I have 27%.
I know that SC plays best when the SPR is high and in this case it would be <2 which means that fold equip is close to zero if the have any hand. Nonetheless I think the call is just fine.
. )and I think it is a pretty unlikely runout that would be interesting.Would like to make a comment on preflop nevertheless since it seems to irritate people.
3-betting 67s is standard I think. I 3 bet 67s 50% and against some opponents I 3-bet them 100%. I agree that the call is very high variance but I am surprised that so many people seem to think it is outright bad. If you have a small bankroll you should definitely fold but if you can cope with the variance I think its a call.
I close the action preflop and I also have the best relative position Postflop which means I can check raise if the flop is good for me. I need about 20% equity to call and if I give my opponents a really tight range I have 27%.
I know that SC plays best when the SPR is high and in this case it would be <2 which means that fold equip is close to zero if the have any hand. Nonetheless I think the call is just fine.
11-11-2017
, 09:13 AM
11-11-2017
, 08:18 PM
Quote:
Ok so this post wasn't about complaining about my bad luck but I thought it was a little bit funny (although it made me sad . )and I think it is a pretty unlikely runout that would be interesting.
Would like to make a comment on preflop nevertheless since it seems to irritate people.
3-betting 67s is standard I think. I 3 bet 67s 50% and against some opponents I 3-bet them 100%. I agree that the call is very high variance but I am surprised that so many people seem to think it is outright bad. If you have a small bankroll you should definitely fold but if you can cope with the variance I think its a call.
I close the action preflop and I also have the best relative position Postflop which means I can check raise if the flop is good for me. I need about 20% equity to call and if I give my opponents a really tight range I have 27%.
I know that SC plays best when the SPR is high and in this case it would be <2 which means that fold equip is close to zero if the have any hand. Nonetheless I think the call is just fine.
. )and I think it is a pretty unlikely runout that would be interesting.Would like to make a comment on preflop nevertheless since it seems to irritate people.
3-betting 67s is standard I think. I 3 bet 67s 50% and against some opponents I 3-bet them 100%. I agree that the call is very high variance but I am surprised that so many people seem to think it is outright bad. If you have a small bankroll you should definitely fold but if you can cope with the variance I think its a call.
I close the action preflop and I also have the best relative position Postflop which means I can check raise if the flop is good for me. I need about 20% equity to call and if I give my opponents a really tight range I have 27%.
I know that SC plays best when the SPR is high and in this case it would be <2 which means that fold equip is close to zero if the have any hand. Nonetheless I think the call is just fine.
Last edited by orb_dam_u; 11-11-2017 at 08:27 PM.
11-12-2017
, 10:27 PM
11-13-2017
, 01:51 PM
