Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Check behind with the nuts on the river - mistake or collusion? Check behind with the nuts on the river - mistake or collusion?

11-18-2008 , 10:34 PM
Probably just an innocent mistake, but how would you react to such a situation?

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em, $6.00+$0.50 Tournament, 100/200 Blinds 25 Ante (4 handed) - Poker-Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com

UTG (t2710)
Hero (Button) (t4695)
SB (t4320)
BB (t1775)

Hero's M: 11.74

Preflop: Hero is Button with 6, 3
UTG calls t200, 1 fold, SB calls t100, BB checks

Flop: (t700) J, 4, 7 (3 players)
SB bets t600, 1 fold, UTG calls t600

Turn: (t1900) K (2 players)
SB checks, UTG bets t600, SB calls t600

River: (t3100) 10 (2 players)
SB checks, UTG checks

Total pot: t3100

Results:
SB had 4, 7 (two pair, sevens and fours).
UTG had A, 8 (flush, Ace high).
Outcome: UTG won t3100
Check behind with the nuts on the river - mistake or collusion? Quote
11-18-2008 , 10:37 PM
probably ran out of time
Check behind with the nuts on the river - mistake or collusion? Quote
11-18-2008 , 10:43 PM
clue: UTG calls t200
Check behind with the nuts on the river - mistake or collusion? Quote

      
m