[ ] red line is important

[ ] Bandichime just opened new Account to hide his identity

nh, move up OP

This

and this.

[x] Redline is pretty important because it will tell you if you lose TOO MUCH in nonsd-winnings. Losing a little isnt a biggie, and has to do more with the style that you play etc. Losing too much of it is a disaster for your winrate and leaves you with some higher variance unless you're really nitty.

Still, nice job OP. GL.

[x]Strat in BBV.

This is how important a red line is OP:

^^^ Started playing more tables at 19K?

Just to proof my point, a small sample, last 2 days. As u see I run below EV and still make a decent amount off chips in nonsd-winnings. If I would have lost in nonsd in the same rate OP does, I would have lost money over these last sessions. Maybe i'm explaining it all wrong but thats what makes most sense to me. Opinions on this subject seem te be very divided, wich is confusing imo.

I play 9 tables of 50NL:

Brag: my green line is better than yours

You guys should see my green line!

Under related images, OP, wife, and kid.

Wat

Does this mean you got to showdown?

thats dumb, since his won$ at showdown would be higher, usually high red line = low blue line

no idea why everyone brags about having a winning non show down, its all about the green line.

My blue line is 2.5BI below EV, it should have been higher than my greenline over this sample.

Its not a brag and its not about you're greenline if your analyzing your game. Saying its only about the greenline is pretty narrowminded since I think it's your winrate that matters the most. I strongly believe its good to have a decent ratio between the two showdown lines i.e it should be balanced. It means you c-bet the right flops know when to give up and double barrel a decent amount against the right opp in the right spots. And if you make it to a showdown, the pots are ussualy bigger and you get called down pretty light wich might even result in slightly higher shwdn winnings as well IF you're capable of adapting to your image in time.

I also hear alot that its impossible to have a positive redline vs weak, loose-passive opp. and i'm sure thats not the case either.

lmao

really wife and kid?

2,1,3

Either 1,2,3 or 2,1

stop acting like your 50nl play has taught you everything you need to know about poker

Who said I never played higher?

How about you give some input to what i'm saying or just stfu?

Good players are more likely to have negative red lines because they fold when they're behind more often than their opponents. That's not a bad thing IMO.

How do you generate an all-in EV graph in PT?

i did give imput...i said you don't know what you are talking about

Damn, did I hate your kind in primary school. Great thing I never really had to deal with this kind of ignorance after that. Only on the internet.

So, this guy is not a good player because he doesnt fold enough?

red line is free money imo