I know the sample is small but its taken me 12 days, single tabling. Progress is constant and I don't expect things to change drastically.

I've only been playing 4 months and during that time often had similar streaks but they were broken up by losing a bunch of buy ins in a single session, from inexperience and tilt, but I think I've plugged most of my big leaks now and I think I've got a pretty good tactic on beating this level at least.

I'm not a believer in variance suddenly popping up out of nowhere because I believe its constantly occurring over my 2600 hands so why would things suddenly change? Piece of cake.

Because even though you plugged the leaks of inexperience and tilt, you can still lose when you are a big favorite. I'm sure you will always win in the long run in these games, just not at that clip. Someone will make a flush when you have a set, someone will make quads when you have a full house. These things happen, and when they do, 81BB/100 won't be the number your graph displays anymore..

I know what you mean, and those things have happened often previously,, and still do, as you can see by the blips on my graph but they are out weighed by the rest. I have also realised that those coolers do not just pop out out of nowhere, there are always signs, so you have the opportunity to sniff them out and fold if you suspicious, although that depends on how big of a gambler you are or how greedy.

If I have a set, and face a huge bet with a flush or straight on the table I just fold. Its not worth it, and I have found in micro that the vast majority of the time, the bets are real. No use looking for a bluff when 80% of the time you lose.

I don't like to gamble, and I basically try to avoid any coin flip situation, with big bets unless its exceptional circumstances. Last night I did something I usually don't do which was go all in pre flop with kings, and of course I got called with pocket aces. I don't see the need for such big gambles usually. I prefer to only put my big money in when Im strong favourate, which means two pair minimum!

2 many wurds itt

2.6k hands is not enough of a sample to determine your winrate ainec. this is nowhere near sustainable, no matter how much you want to believe in it.

OP is daft.

I will update the thread when I reach $500 which is when I will move upto 10NL

Inb4 downswing and OP busts everything. Bet he never posts again. 1.8K hands, over/under ?

I wish people would stfu and stop educating in threads like this. Nice progress OP tell all your friends about it and get them involved

OP is a true legend!

Now OP imagine you increased your tables to 4 and played at least for 3 hours. You'll be getting in 2500 hands and 115 dollars.

For 3 hours work thats awesome cash. And then play for 6 hours, you get $230. Times by 5 working days and you got yourself 1150. Time to quit work imo.

What's your secret?

time to move up to 7NL I reckon.

You are so correct. If you can run good for almost 3k hands, you have beaten variance for good and it will never bother you again.

So you can afford to eat one medium pizza a day, good thing your mom doesn't charge you rent.

In before you lose $100 in a 100 hand stretch.

wtf is 6nl ;s

I don't think that anyone cares op.. You better don't start a thread next time. This time you didn't got to many EAD replys, but it's not over yet... And EAD man.

No no, don't bother. And.. you probably won't update anyway, because after 3K hands more, your win rate will shrink atleast 2x

FYI 2500 hands is 4 hours of play for most.

winrate should be higher if variance isn't a factor.

rake paid?

I once made 150bb/100 over a 2 hand sample.

add another table...

Nice beat OP