they know we're on to them thanks to tilter spilling the beans

In the poker game of life, women are the rake man. They are the f***in' rake.

Is that why there are only 100,00 posts in and 5,500,000 views of the "Poker is rigged" debate thread in IP?

Apart from fidstar-poker and his OCG cronies, that is?

I could keep going back and forth with you guys but it is pointless if you aren't going to be real or serious. Why is the goal to dismiss and discredit rather than to educate?

Let's say you are right, and there aren't any superusers on ACR and I just don't know what I'm talking about. Why would the protocol be to mock and riducule instead of educate?

I also have no idea what you are referring with your fidstar-poker and ocg cronies because I obviously never accused him of anything like being a criminal or doing anything illegal.

what if he had 9-5 and called? that would be rather obvious and I was testing them so I'm sure they know to try and not make it too obvious but that's just a guess. I don't know if they are bots and just programs or employees playing the accounts or if it is someone who knows how to hack the software. I don't know how it works. I have guesses but those are just that guesses and not based on any experience or knowledge.

I ran another filter and was dealt AA 23 times and faced a 3-bet preflop 0 times. If I run filters with this in mind, then it appears obvious.

Nobody wants to hear about that though because we all know that you aren't actually wanting to know what I think because you already know. I was probably one of the last to know. That's usually how it works with me and one thing that had me going back to that site was this forum, Doug Polk, Ryan Fee, and Chris Moneymaker. Feel scammed by them just as much as the site but that's my fault for trusting someone that I don't know and only watch a couple Youtube videos. Which is pretty dumb but I though Polk was a standup guy from what I saw. I was definately wrong there.

There could be super users on any online poker. You come in here with no evidence and expect to jump to attention. What were you seriously expecting here?

It's like shouting that the election was rigged and expecting people to believe it. Wait...

One thing I have to plead ignorance on is I never have any idea what you people are saying half the time when you abbreviate everything. I have no idea what that means, I mean it looks like English but I don't understand it. 100,000 posts in what? thread in IP? huh?

I am only going by when it says how many people are viewing an area of the site. Don't know if that's called a topic or what. The most obvious thing here regardless of what your sentence actually does mean is that my comment doesn't belong here because it has nothing to do with bad beats, variance, or bragging.

Why did the UB/AP get exposed? What was different about that other than the stakes were much higher. Is that it? Obviously I don't have a HH where the site screwed up and sent me with someone's IP address on it. I played mostly small stakes but played the occassional $15/$30 and $10/$20 and those cash games are what convinced me of what was going on. They don't take hands off at that limit and it becomes even more obvious.

I watched the youtube video of the potripper hand histories and it looks so similar to the games I played. The ones I win are by sucking out or making a call on the river when they are bluffing me. Just like in those hands. I feel like a fool because I'm sure I'm the last to know this and people are probably like "duh".

If he was a superuser he would have jammed. DUCY?



I think you need sleep. This is literally gibberish.

what do you mean I expect to jump to attention? I don't expect anything and didn't expect anything less than what happened to me previously. I knew I would get mocked and laughed at. I wanted to warn others, what evidence do you want anyway? Tell me what you want and I'll get it to you.

what if he had 6-4 or 9-5 or another garbage hand? I would have called because I was testing and needed the hands to go to showdown to try and get as much info as possible.

also, have no idea what ducy means

It's not gibberish but evidence that you mentioned. How is that not weird that I never received a 3-bet when holding AA but when I raise with 7-2 I got 3-bet 3 out of 3 times??

Why do I waste my time having a discussion with someone who doesn't want any of the evidence that they are requesting. Your goal is dismiss and mock, not educate or research.

I don't know but they do have them in Blitz but not as a SNG. I think Nagy said in his interview with Joey Ingram that they were losing money on them so he got rid of them. I don't believe anything that comes out his mouth though so not sure why they did that.

If you called and won the hand, he would think you were the Superuser.

post the screen shot of your stats showing you never got 3 bet when raising heads-up with AA.

Oh...

Convenient...

fair point, and yes I did do that because if you will also see that it was out of fear. I did find an old computer that I used that I had the HH on. One thing that I kept doing was I thought maybe there was a trojan or malware on my computer so I would switch them up. Then I would import the HH so that my HUD stats were there. Also, I don't know much about technology or computers but I've heard that the files that are deleted aren't really and can be recovered. So I am sure there is an excellent program that could be used to recover them.

I will post the screenshot shortly.

While I get that for you, since you are such a defender of these fine outstanding people, why don't you just use your database with your own HH since you play there so often for real money because you trust them or don't think there is anything shady going on there. I don't think that I'm the only one this happened to so if anyone else plays on that site, then they should run the filter in their database and see what comes up for them.

Here is the screenshot, and I was wrong, it wasn't 0 it was 1.

https://imgur.com/a/2vC8gxl

fiddy, we need to stop, he'll figure out you're dolly parton and then our scheme is kaput

I've said this before but that looks like English. I can read the words but have no clue what it is supposed to mean. He asked for a screenshot so I gave him one. Can you provide proof that you play or have ever played on WPN? I'd love to see that or see you record yourself making a deposit on that site and playing a few hands. We both know that isn't going to happen. But seriously, if you don't want to contribute to a real discussion then just go troll someone else. Maybe you can find the potripper thread and mock those guys too.

Filter it for AA preflop only.

Tilter, you're either very bored and dusted off your old alt account to do this or you're likely suffering from a mental health issue.

Since you're familiar with the pot ripper thread, I suggest you go back there yourself and see how that one provides evidence. If you could do that then maybe people would take you seriously. You're not providing any evidence, you're just telling random stories that if anything demonstrate your theory is wrong as why on earth would they fold to when you raise with 7 high if they could see your cards?

what do you mean preflop only? I use DriveHud and I selected AA, and filtered "faced preflop 3-bet".

The only mental health issue I have is one from nobody responding to what I ask. I have said it before and I'll say it again, whatever evidence you want I will provide. What I really want to see from you or anyone who thinks I'm just suffering from mental health issue is to simply provide proof that you play on the site.

To answer your question, this is what drives me crazy with you guys is how you take one instance and not looking at the overall picture of what I'm saying. Just because there is one move that someone makes doesn't prove or disprove anything. I just called someone down with j high to see his hand and then i'm raising with 7-3 maybe he didn't want his hand going to showdown. If he doesn't have 7-3 beat or he himself has a garbage hand. I really don't know and to have to explain this one instance and ignore all the points that I make that do make sense, to just cherry pick one move is so frustrating. It means you don't want to know or you already know. You aren't interested in anything other than to mock and dismiss. It makes no sense. I don't have the HH where all the hands are face up and an IP address of someone. I can only go by what I do have. I don't know if you actually think that I have mental health issues or why you would have such a strong stance about a site that you yourself don't even play on. Provide proof that you play on the site or create an account and play yourself. Play ten hands on that site and tell me it's not rigged. Go ahead, I'll wait.

so post your database then highlighting how specific players play perfectly to a statistically impossible level

stop this whining and story time and pst the evidence - if you actually have something you'll be a hero instead of some insane cuck halfway through another manic episode