Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
ACR Superuser? ACR Superuser?

12-31-2018 , 01:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by FranFran
1- paranoid scale doesnt exist you idiot
omg u r so cute
ACR Superuser? Quote
12-31-2018 , 03:32 PM
Congrats OP this is the worst thread of 2018
ACR Superuser? Quote
12-31-2018 , 03:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldFishshark


Thats not a scale it’s a ****ing quiz without a scale in the end. Why are you so ignorant and mad?
ACR Superuser? Quote
01-01-2019 , 01:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colin_Piddle
Congrats OP this is the worst thread of 2018
TY for contributing and helping to make it better! At least I snuck it in there before 2019 came around.

Quote:
Originally Posted by FranFran
Thats not a scale it’s a ****ing quiz without a scale in the end. Why are you so ignorant and mad?
Despite the fact that you're tryna troll (ps you're not as good at it as you think), I can't help but point out that the literal first two words on that page, in bold, are Paranoia Scale.
ACR Superuser? Quote
01-01-2019 , 03:08 PM
You actually took the time to quote all of those posts? My last comment had a double quote in it and even that was a pain. That legitimately must've taken a long time... Like a masterpiece of internet trolling. I mean, you can do whatever you want, nobody is stopping you from being a useless human being.

P.S. at this point I'm enjoying replying to your messages. At least I can run up my post count and maybe one day be as cool as you are on this forum.

Last edited by goldFishshark; 01-01-2019 at 03:23 PM.
ACR Superuser? Quote
01-01-2019 , 06:34 PM
You clearly don't know how to use the forum software you ****ing idiot
ACR Superuser? Quote
01-01-2019 , 06:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldFishshark
This guy has $41k in profit... Is this like a legitimate value line with 3rd pair? 3/4 on the turn? (River notwithstanding)

Winning Poker Network (Yatahay) - 500/1,000 NL - Holdem - 8 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

SB: 34.31 BB (VPIP: 19.06, PFR: 15.53, 3Bet Preflop: 9.24, Hands: 474)
BB: 78.49 BB (VPIP: 32.35, PFR: 14.71, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 34)
UTG: 13.76 BB (VPIP: 44.44, PFR: 5.56, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 18)
UTG+1: 30.92 BB (VPIP: 25.00, PFR: 12.50, 3Bet Preflop: 33.33, Hands: 8)
MP: 37.67 BB (VPIP: 14.71, PFR: 12.12, 3Bet Preflop: 9.09, Hands: 34)
MP+1: 13.08 BB (VPIP: 15.00, PFR: 15.79, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 21)
CO: 29.92 BB (VPIP: 25.24, PFR: 20.71, 3Bet Preflop: 14.86, Hands: 207)
Hero (BTN): 16.8 BB

8 players post ante of 0.13 BB, SB posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 2.5 BB) Hero has 8 7

fold, fold, fold, fold, CO raises to 2.2 BB, fold, fold, BB calls 1.2 BB

Flop: (5.9 BB, 2 players) K Q T
BB checks, CO bets 2.44 BB, BB calls 2.44 BB

Turn: (10.78 BB, 2 players) 8
BB checks, CO bets 6 BB, BB calls 6 BB

River: (22.78 BB, 2 players) T
BB checks, CO bets 19.16 BB and is all-in, BB calls 19.16 BB

BB shows J T (Three of a Kind, Tens)
(Pre 31%, Flop 31%, Turn 17%)
CO shows T A (Three of a Kind, Tens)
(Pre 69%, Flop 69%, Turn 83%)
CO wins 61.1 BB
Quote:
Originally Posted by rileymadison2345
Looks like hes trying to get a queen to fold. Turn is not for value..
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldFishshark
Why bet flop then?
Quote:
Originally Posted by a dewd
What am I missing? Looks like two LAGs chasing a straight draw with a set. What part of the hand suggests superuser?
Quote:
Originally Posted by djevans
he's getting value from any Jx suited hand and has a gut shot. He only gets wrecked if he gets raised. He probably checks back river unimproved.

Im not tourney expert but I think j5 suited + is calling pre for that price 30bb deep.
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldFishshark
I guess that makes sense... shows what I know.

To me it just looks like he's getting ultra thin value on 2 streets. Aren't there many worse hands to bluff with here than 3rd pair TK?...
Quote:
Originally Posted by silkhandlez
I would worry more about players who seem to always 2x pot on river when you are at the top of your range.. like 2nd nuts top of your range.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colin_Piddle
No your wrong. Your in BB he knows ur range is weak and mostly weighted towards weak one paired hands at best. Meanwhile he can have all the straights, two pairs and sets here. He's trying to get you off a pair.
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldFishshark
Yes but why not bluff here with Jx, Ax, or even our backdoor flushes? I guess the topic of this thread is changing... but why not check flop and bluff catch TR? It's not like villain's range is super capped. Can't a reasonable BB flatting range still have some 2 pairs and straights? Especially versus a CO open (compared to a BTN open).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaewoo
opening this thread makes me feel superused
Quote:
Originally Posted by FranFran
Im thinking of silver surfer
Quote:
Originally Posted by thabighurt35
op,

you are an idiot

/thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjjou812
Why would he need to be a superuser if you willingly call it off with bottom pair?
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldFishshark
In case you missed it... I'm not even in this hand.

Okay I agree this isn't a strong case for cheating on ACR. It seemed suspicious to me based on how I'd play the hand out, so I thought I'd ask opinions. Even a fish bets flop and checks turn here.

No need to be a dick, that's just a reflection on you, not me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FranFran
Have you seen your mum in supergirl costume?

Very nice and soft, real superuser
Quote:
Originally Posted by thabighurt35
.
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldFishshark
Ooh you two sure showed me.

I just changed my New Years resolution. I now want to waste a huge amount of time making 10k+ forum posts, with a considerable amount of them being an *******. Can't wait to see where that brings me in life.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fidstar-poker
OP,

You've provided an absolutely terrible example of a superuser.

It was so bad that the mods in the forum you posted it moved it to a section of the forum (BBV) that is all about trolling bad threads.

I'm sorry you made a terrible thread. It's okay, we've all been there (except me obviously). You will survive.
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldFishshark
FYI, here is another hand from the same player. River shove makes some sense, but at the same time it feels awfully coincidental.

Winning Poker Network (Yatahay) - 150/300 NL - Holdem - 8 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

BB: 42.34 BB (VPIP: 22.10, PFR: 16.73, 3Bet Preflop: 7.66, Hands: 107)
UTG: 53.5 BB (VPIP: 31.03, PFR: 13.79, 3Bet Preflop: 5.88, Hands: 29)
UTG+1: 33.2 BB (VPIP: 20.45, PFR: 16.09, 3Bet Preflop: 12.12, Hands: 89)
MP: 25.58 BB (VPIP: 24.60, PFR: 15.57, 3Bet Preflop: 10.87, Hands: 127)
MP+1: 27.37 BB (VPIP: 19.72, PFR: 10.79, 3Bet Preflop: 3.39, Hands: 143)
CO: 106.28 BB (VPIP: 21.88, PFR: 9.38, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 33)
BTN: 40.77 BB (VPIP: 26.38, PFR: 21.15, 3Bet Preflop: 15.00, Hands: 164)
Hero (SB): 14.35 BB

8 players post ante of 0.13 BB, Hero posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 2.57 BB) Hero has 3 7

fold, fold, fold, fold, fold, BTN raises to 2.25 BB, fold, BB calls 1.25 BB

Flop: (6.07 BB, 2 players) 9 7 J
BB checks, BTN bets 2.13 BB, BB calls 2.13 BB

Turn: (10.33 BB, 2 players) 5
BB checks, BTN bets 6 BB, BB calls 6 BB

River: (22.33 BB, 2 players) Q
BB checks, BTN bets 30.39 BB and is all in, BB calls 30.39 BB

BB shows 9 Q (Two Pair, Queens and Nines)
(Pre 62%, Flop 5%, Turn 0%)
BTN shows 8 T (Straight, Queen High)
(Pre 38%, Flop 95%, Turn 100%)
BTN wins 83.11 BB
Quote:
Originally Posted by fidstar-poker
Yep. Silly bastard for betting every street with a straight when someone is willing to call with second pair.
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldFishshark
I get that now, but if I didn't post the hand and ask for opinions, I would've just sat around and wondered. Yes, the title was a terrible choice. It was late and I was tired. (In fact, if you're able as a mod, could you change it to something else? Or even delete this thread tbh)

I'm not paranoid that everyone's a bot or that poker is rigged, I've just heard some things recently about ACR that sketched me out. I figured it was worthwhile to bring up a suspicion.



Was specifically referring to the river overshove.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fidstar-poker
If you think the two hands you provided are evidence of a superuser. You are probably paranoid. Just because a player doesn't play a hand exactly like you would, doesn't mean they are a superuser.

If you think ACR is sketchy, why do you want to play there?
Quote:
Originally Posted by FranFran
He wants to be superused...

Genetics
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldFishshark
On a scale of 1 to **** FranFran, I'm probably a solid 2.5. It is still surprising to me to see a winning reg double barrel bottom pair in that spot, and it's not correct according to Snowie (admittedly not the best analysis tool). Optimal line is checking most of the time, or checking turn if betting the flop. I also don't "think they're evidence," I just found them suspicious.

Why play on ACR? I mainly don't. But there aren't many legal sites where I live. Even if I knew for a fact that there were cheaters and botters--of which there almost certainly are--I'd still have a decent winrate there and no better options. (That's why ACR staff doesn't do anything about bots, etc., acc. Mr. Ingram)

In fact, I was playing on there quite a bit until the whole DDoS thing went off. I played on another site for a while, but there wasn't enough volume.
Quote:
Originally Posted by FranFran
1- paranoid scale doesnt exist you idiot
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldFishshark
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colin_Piddle
Congrats OP this is the worst thread of 2018
Quote:
Originally Posted by FranFran
Thats not a scale it’s a ****ing quiz without a scale in the end. Why are you so ignorant and mad?
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldFishshark
TY for contributing and helping to make it better! At least I snuck it in there before 2019 came around.



Despite the fact that you're tryna troll (ps you're not as good at it as you think), I can't help but point out that the literal first two words on that page, in bold, are Paranoia Scale.
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldFishshark
You actually took the time to quote all of those posts? My last comment had a double quote in it and even that was a pain. That legitimately must've taken a long time... Like a masterpiece of internet trolling. I mean, you can do whatever you want, nobody is stopping you from being a useless human being.

P.S. at this point I'm enjoying replying to your messages. At least I can run up my post count and maybe one day be as cool as you are on this forum.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlwaysFolding
You clearly don't know how to use the forum software you ****ing idiot
45 seconds.
ACR Superuser? Quote
01-01-2019 , 06:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlwaysFolding
You clearly don't know how to use the forum software you ****ing idiot
BRB, going to go sit in the corner and rethink my whole life because there's another 10k+ poster (and omg you managed to do it in 2 years) who thinks I give more than a second thought about my anonymous reputation in the trolling section of a forum with decade(s)-old technology.

P.S. your optimistic 45 seconds estimate is much too long a time to waste on an idiot. And in fact, your last two posts are 2 minutes apart, so... My posts for you all take about 5-10 seconds. Anyway, it's time to let this thread die, so you all can sadly say goodbye to all of your useless comments and insignificant voices.

Last edited by goldFishshark; 01-01-2019 at 07:20 PM.
ACR Superuser? Quote
01-01-2019 , 11:47 PM
We need to flush this thread. You'll thank me later.

ACR Superuser? Quote
01-02-2019 , 12:15 AM
OP its good to stay vigilant on ACR, and asking for other peoples advice is a good thing.

one thing i can tell you for certain: some very bad stuff is going on on ACR. ive reached out to several regs and they all tell me the bots are there, and they are bleeding the ecosystem. if you go to the highstakes PLO thread you can see the details about the investigation some players are doing into the bot rings, gathering data.

remember that player investigations have been successfull before, the ultimate bet scandal was first uncovered by 2+2 users gathering data, so was the pokerstars ring. IMO the unfortunate truth is that players have to adopt a vigilante mindset and police the sites themselves
ACR Superuser? Quote
01-03-2019 , 02:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goldFishshark
BRB, going to go sit in the corner and rethink my whole life because there's another 10k+ poster (and omg you managed to do it in 2 years) who thinks I give more than a second thought about my anonymous reputation in the trolling section of a forum with decade(s)-old technology.

P.S. your optimistic 45 seconds estimate is much too long a time to waste on an idiot. And in fact, your last two posts are 2 minutes apart, so... My posts for you all take about 5-10 seconds. Anyway, it's time to let this thread die, so you all can sadly say goodbye to all of your useless comments and insignificant voices.
Original post: 6:50 pm
Edit finished at 7:20 pm

You are not only a huge ****ing idiot, but a poorly chronologically trained one. Are you possibly Danish?

We should probably let your gene pool die first and let this thread exist as a testament to why. #HypocrisyIsSoFun
ACR Superuser? Quote
01-03-2019 , 02:24 AM
ITT op doesn't get that time-trials don't start immediately
ACR Superuser? Quote
01-03-2019 , 02:25 AM
ITT I post useful posts in a useless thread
ACR Superuser? Quote
01-03-2019 , 02:25 AM
ITT I forsake punctuation because op doesnt know the difference anyway
ACR Superuser? Quote
01-03-2019 , 02:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Always Fondling
We need to flush this thread. You'll thank me later.

Docusate, docusate, oh docu-docusate-- DOCUSATE

Bum-bum-bum-bum

Call him baby docusate
Tell you why
His posts are ****tier than a brown eye
and when he does his stinky potty dance
then he hasn't got clean pants
I call him

Docusate, docusate oh docu-docusate-- DOCUSATE

bum-bum-bum-bum
ACR Superuser? Quote
01-03-2019 , 02:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by +EVillain
OP its good to stay vigilant on ACR, and asking for other peoples advice is a good thing.

one thing i can tell you for certain: some very bad stuff is going on on ACR. ive reached out to several regs and they all tell me the bots are there, and they are bleeding the ecosystem. if you go to the highstakes PLO thread you can see the details about the investigation some players are doing into the bot rings, gathering data.

remember that player investigations have been successfull before, the ultimate bet scandal was first uncovered by 2+2 users gathering data, so was the pokerstars ring. IMO the unfortunate truth is that players have to adopt a vigilante mindset and police the sites themselves
Irrelevant post that deserves punishment. This isn't about possible bots. OP is claiming superusers based on zero evidence.
ACR Superuser? Quote
01-03-2019 , 02:38 AM
Your punishment must be more severe!
ACR Superuser? Quote
01-03-2019 , 06:24 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaewoo
opening this thread makes me feel superused
This
ACR Superuser? Quote

      
m