Absolutely 100 % disgusted by Spin N Go's - Page 2

I was honestly starting to wonder if the whole forum was trolling me on this one. It's phrased that (wrong)way most times its used on here and, not alot in a thread tilts me but for some reason this does. If you can read the words you should know the difference, and that what you're saying is actually the exact opposite of what you mean. See, I'm off on one already...
And I could care less

Quote

09-28-2016 , 06:54 AM

#28

luckynuts444

journeyman

Join Date: Sep 2016 Posts: 284

Quote:

Originally Posted by rakemeplz

I know whenever I'm looking for a low variance poker format to enjoy I fire up a few of those online spin and gos.

confirmed i'm an idiot... Just never thought i would go on 200 bi downswing... Currently made some back but still down 160

No more 4 tabling spins for 10 hours a day... RIP spin dream

Quote

09-28-2016 , 10:38 AM

#29

donnie5

grinder

Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 417

Quote:

Originally Posted by luckynuts444

What are you talking about you idiot... Im talking about graphs for your chip ev... Rake is not included in chip graphs lol My lord... Looks like you have some learning to do

JeffC, every pot is raked and that hurst your blue line you complete moran compared to yellow line. Quit now if you can't grasp simple concepts like this.

Quote

09-28-2016 , 12:35 PM

#30

NikoP

journeyman

Join Date: Mar 2013 Posts: 273

So you broke the variance? That's good to hear

Quote

09-28-2016 , 04:51 PM

#31

luckynuts444

journeyman

Join Date: Sep 2016 Posts: 284

Quote:

Originally Posted by donnie5

JeffC, every pot is raked and that hurst your blue line you complete moran compared to yellow line. Quit now if you can't grasp simple concepts like this.

Every pot in a Spin N Go is raked is it... I think you might be thinking about just a general winnings graph... Then yes that would make sense

I'm talking about a graph for your chip ev... Rake included in tourny chips won or lost for Spin n Go's makes zero sense... In fact it just plain isn't included in this graph...

So i would suggest you quit if you can't grasp simple concepts like this

Quote

09-28-2016 , 05:53 PM

#32

Anyway

adept

Join Date: Jan 2015 Posts: 888

Quote:

Originally Posted by luckynuts444

confirmed i'm an idiot... Just never thought i would go on 200 bi downswing... Currently made some back but still down 160

No more 4 tabling spins for 10 hours a day... RIP spin dream

So you thought you could just clickeddy click click buttons to rake in the dough?

Quote

09-28-2016 , 07:30 PM

#33

luckynuts444

journeyman

Join Date: Sep 2016 Posts: 284

Isn't that what online poker is lol we play numerous tables and click buttons and make a profit...

Not sure where you're going with that one

Quote

09-28-2016 , 08:02 PM

#34

donnie5

grinder

Join Date: Jan 2011 Posts: 417

Quote:

Originally Posted by luckynuts444

Oh, I now see your Canadian. Nvm.

Quote

09-28-2016 , 08:09 PM

#35

Dr. Meh

veteran

Join Date: Aug 2013 Posts: 3,351

Have you tried slots?

Quote

09-28-2016 , 08:50 PM

#36

luckynuts444

journeyman

Join Date: Sep 2016 Posts: 284

Every second Tuesday when the games are good

Last edited by luckynuts444; 09-28-2016 at 09:02 PM.

Quote

09-28-2016 , 11:35 PM

#37

Gmancrief

centurion

Join Date: Apr 2015 Posts: 144

Ship the nickels

Quote

09-28-2016 , 11:50 PM

#38

luckynuts444

journeyman

Join Date: Sep 2016 Posts: 284

need the nickels off slots to hedge the spins

Quote

09-29-2016 , 02:32 AM

#39

TreadLightly

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Oct 2013 Posts: 3,709

So the cliffs are you didn't post any graphs so you probably suck also you spend 10 hours a day 4 tabling $1 spin n gos and have lost $200 so far? Am I missing anything

Quote

09-29-2016 , 04:35 AM

#40

luckynuts444

journeyman

Join Date: Sep 2016 Posts: 284

Yup you nailed it man... Like your thread on your 2.50 cent 180 man turbo... Really interesting stuff there.. You probably shouldn't be talking crap about anyone playing 2.50 cent turbos bro lol complete joke..

Also, seeing how 3 years ago you were playing 5 nl and you're still playing the absolutely bottom of the barrel micro stakes... Probably should just quit

Clearly you don't grasp poker very well.. Best of luck to you and appreciate your donations to the poker community in the ever elusive 2.50c 180 man turbo fields

Last edited by luckynuts444; 09-29-2016 at 04:59 AM.

Quote

09-29-2016 , 03:37 PM

#41

Anyway

adept

Join Date: Jan 2015 Posts: 888

Like he does give a fuchs. It is like whatvever mang

Quote

09-29-2016 , 04:11 PM

#42

vrael111

veteran

Join Date: Dec 2013 Posts: 2,955

Quote:

Originally Posted by luckynuts444

Bang

Quote

10-01-2016 , 06:38 AM

#43

sheeprustler

veteran

Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 3,292

Quote:

Originally Posted by luckynuts444

$1 stake (7% rake)
0% ROI: 37.6 chips/game
2% ROI: 48.3 chips/game
5% ROI: 64.5 chips/game
$3, $7 stake (6% rake)
0% ROI: 31.9 chips/game
2% ROI: 42.5 chips/game
5% ROI: 58.5 chips/game
$15, $30, $60, $100 stake (5% rake)
0% ROI: 26.3 chips/game
2% ROI: 36.8 chips/game
5% ROI: 52.6 chips/game

So according to applied mathematics, which I trust opposed to people who have trouble establishing common knowledge.. my ev is an roi of around 5 percent...

If your great-great grand children play spin and goes your family will realise the ROI you've quoted.

Rake at the 15s is 6% btw

Quote

10-01-2016 , 10:02 AM

#44

King Fish

A Big Deal Around Here

Join Date: Jan 2007 Posts: 15,065

OP right now

Quote

10-01-2016 , 11:41 AM

#45

luckynuts444

journeyman

Join Date: Sep 2016 Posts: 284

I no longer play spins consistently... I can't handle the frustration of only playing them... Can't break the variance

Last edited by luckynuts444; 10-01-2016 at 11:56 AM.

Quote

10-01-2016 , 02:34 PM

#46

Maybe_memories

old hand

Join Date: Aug 2009 Posts: 1,470

Quote:

Originally Posted by .isolated

couldn't care less*. Think about why that's how you say it and not the way you (now previously) did.

You gotta get these guys once in a while. They took one english and one writing class at JUCO and it blew their mind, now they roll around like Stephen Hawking.

My statement holds tho, because obv this forum could care less. They are still posting in response to OP, whereas were he to pull a Jose "dumbass" Fernandez and die suddenly, they wouldn't care enough to post anything.

How is that Associates Degree in business "management" working for you? Can you even make 30k a year? glgl

Quote

10-01-2016 , 04:40 PM

#47

Dr. Meh

veteran

Join Date: Aug 2013 Posts: 3,351

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maybe_memories

I actually looked this up once and while the origin is "couldn't", "could" is also considered correct as it is colloquially accepted. No need to defend yourself as both are correct.

Quote

10-02-2016 , 01:24 PM

#48

Benat

journeyman

Join Date: May 2015 Posts: 307

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Meh

I actually looked this up once and while the origin is "couldn't", "could" is also considered correct as it is colloquially accepted. No need to defend yourself as both are correct.

I could give a ****! hold on hold on that isn't right!