Quote:
Originally Posted by BalugaWhale
whats so sick? you got it in with the effective 2nd nuts on a board with a million worse hands that want to play?
Quote:
Originally Posted by BalugaWhale
maybe? stove it? not that it really matters but i get your point.
we shouldnt be concentrating too much on absolute hand strength
here is a rough stove
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt
118,800 games 0.001 secs 118,800,000 games/sec
Board: 8c 7h 9h
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 45.111% 43.80% 01.31% 53340 1591.50 { 99 }
Hand 1: 54.889% 53.58% 01.31% 65247 1591.50 { 99-77, AhTh, JTs, Th8h, 8h6h, 65s, JTo, 65o }
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt
566,280 games 0.023 secs 24,620,869 games/sec
Board: 8c 7h 9h
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 33.150% 21.41% 11.74% 7842 4301.00 { 6c5c }
Hand 1: 66.850% 55.11% 11.74% 20186 4301.00 { 99-77, AhTh, JTs, Th8h, 8h6h, 65s, JTo, 65o }
so strictly speaking, getting it in with the effective 3rd nuts on the flop is better than having 2nd nuts
in terms of hand value 77 = 56 imo
getting 56 here in is -EV im pretty sure
Last edited by thatssosick; 09-30-2009 at 05:13 PM.