Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Mink Coats Mink Coats

08-12-2022 , 01:32 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CactusCub
Why does the possible raise change our decision? It's not like we'd consider calling
I guess I was assuming that there's some unrealized equity when we are forced to fold making the cost of calling larger than one bet. But if you assume that the raise behind *always has it* then folding wouldn't lose anything extra. Idk your assumption is probably safer than mine?
Mink Coats Quote
08-12-2022 , 02:53 PM
So the game is built around 4 massive fish. One of them was down $8K in like 6 hours. The decent players are break even. It's the world's best game..
Mink Coats Quote
08-12-2022 , 03:43 PM
I'll allow it.
Mink Coats Quote
08-13-2022 , 01:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninefingershuffle
So the game is built around 4 massive fish. One of them was down $8K in like 6 hours. The decent players are break even. It's the world's best game..
And is maka a breakeven player or a fish?
Mink Coats Quote
08-13-2022 , 09:13 AM
Maka says he is coming to the game but never shows up
Mink Coats Quote
08-13-2022 , 09:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by checkraisdraw
And is maka a breakeven player or a fish?
Im a TAG fish. May come on Mon if I can get a seat.
Mink Coats Quote
08-14-2022 , 06:26 AM
I like the hand as played to river.

Small blind donking value range beats QQ here 100% if he's trying to play well.

I think 3 handed river bluff ranges are not constructed using principles of indifference and minimum defense frequency. Instead 3 handed river bluff ranges should rely on blockers and removal effect.

Since you hold half the queens, there are much fewer combos of such blocker/removal combos in small blinds range. Thus I predict he is value heavy.

I fold river.
Mink Coats Quote
08-14-2022 , 01:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninefingershuffle
Maka says he is coming to the game but never shows up
+1

Surprised not perm banned but I'm wearing a wig on Mon per requests

Last edited by maka2184; 08-14-2022 at 01:36 PM.
Mink Coats Quote
08-14-2022 , 01:40 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob148
I like the hand as played to river.

Small blind donking value range beats QQ here 100% if he's trying to play well.

I think 3 handed river bluff ranges are not constructed using principles of indifference and minimum defense frequency. Instead 3 handed river bluff ranges should rely on blockers and removal effect.

Since you hold half the queens, there are much fewer combos of such blocker/removal combos in small blinds range. Thus I predict he is value heavy.

I fold river.
+1

OT: 100% think ninefingershuffle honest in posts but intends on forcing folds from me & Sheseasy on Mon when we may have QQ instead of ninefingershuffle on JsTs3c2hKs for the mink coat
Mink Coats Quote
08-14-2022 , 01:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninefingershuffle
So the game is built around 4 massive fish. One of them was down $8K in like 6 hours. The decent players are break even. It's the world's best game..
+1

Except I think 6-10+ massive fish. Several busto (ex: maka2184 ), only when in town.

No break even players, only creative TAG & LAG semi pros that run bad imo
Mink Coats Quote
08-14-2022 , 07:58 PM
Pretty sure everything maka says is a level.
Mink Coats Quote
08-14-2022 , 11:06 PM
Love maka but the emojis in posts are confusing. I folded. Button folded.
Mink Coats Quote
08-15-2022 , 08:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninefingershuffle
Love maka but the emojis in posts are confusing. I folded. Button folded.
Well played, didn't you win 5k this session Ninefingershuffle?

OT: Majority of my posts are not level except cases in which I'm optimistic how great Dr. Elo, Unguarded, Bryce was as a winning LAG pre Black Friday.
Mink Coats Quote
08-26-2022 , 03:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by checkraisdraw
And is maka a breakeven player or a fish?
I don't know maka, but isn't there a 3rd option?
Mink Coats Quote
08-26-2022 , 05:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CactusCub
I don't know maka, but isn't there a 3rd option?
+1

I'm a net loser NIT TAG fish. Exceptions are donators pre black Friday online, whales, degenerate Minus 10BB+/100 Creative LAG, TAG, and Loose Passive players.

OT: I'm 0/3 vs 1 LAG whale in Mon game I goto HUHU so I'm 1000% TAG fish just donating to poker eco system imo
Mink Coats Quote
08-28-2022 , 12:12 AM
why say lot word when few word do trick
Mink Coats Quote
08-29-2022 , 11:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by maka2184
+1

I'm a net loser NIT TAG fish. Exceptions are donators pre black Friday online, whales, degenerate Minus 10BB+/100 Creative LAG, TAG, and Loose Passive players.

OT: I'm 0/3 vs 1 LAG whale in Mon game I goto HUHU so I'm 1000% TAG fish just donating to poker eco system imo
Can you maybe consider reducing your number of posts? I don't think it's really necessary to resurrect old threads, and it's really bad for these already dying forums when there's just a wall of maka posts on the front page because you've gone through 16 threads and replied to each one, all of which end with some "OT" remark that name drops some combination of DonJuan, Sean Snyder, ninefingershuffle, Unguarded, and lord knows who else.

If you're admittedly a net loser, the forums would benefit from fewer, more well-thought out posts so we can help evaluate your reasoning. Just saying you'd do X in a given hand, which you then always caveat by saying "but I'm a fish so it's probably wrong," doesn't really add any value.

tldr; let's limit the amount of shitposting given that these forums are already in dire straits.
Mink Coats Quote
08-29-2022 , 02:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hardinthepaint
Can you maybe consider reducing your number of posts? I don't think it's really necessary to resurrect old threads, and it's really bad for these already dying forums when there's just a wall of maka posts on the front page because you've gone through 16 threads and replied to each one, all of which end with some "OT" remark that name drops some combination of DonJuan, Sean Snyder, ninefingershuffle, Unguarded, and lord knows who else.

If you're admittedly a net loser, the forums would benefit from fewer, more well-thought out posts so we can help evaluate your reasoning. Just saying you'd do X in a given hand, which you then always caveat by saying "but I'm a fish so it's probably wrong," doesn't really add any value.

tldr; let's limit the amount of shitposting given that these forums are already in dire straits.
Why would active posts and users in a flailing forum be a problem? Maka is generally responding to a question that was asked of him, and he knows the people he's mentioning. The dude is having fun on the internet, and plays in the games that these forums are for.
Mink Coats Quote
08-30-2022 , 04:23 PM
Because shitposting is bad for forums, even those that are less active than we'd like them to be. I'm not asking maka to go away, stop contributing, or anything like that. I just think the low content posts belong in the LC/NC thread, and its really unnecessary to run through 10-15 old threads and add a "+1."
Mink Coats Quote
08-30-2022 , 04:24 PM
Like, seriously....

Mink Coats Quote
09-03-2022 , 12:30 AM
Try PM'ing people in the future if you have concerns about their behavior.
Mink Coats Quote
09-04-2022 , 09:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by hardinthepaint
Can you maybe consider reducing your number of posts? I don't think it's really necessary to resurrect old threads, and it's really bad for these already dying forums when there's just a wall of maka posts on the front page because you've gone through 16 threads and replied to each one, all of which end with some "OT" remark that name drops some combination of DonJuan, Sean Snyder, ninefingershuffle, Unguarded, and lord knows who else.

If you're admittedly a net loser, the forums would benefit from fewer, more well-thought out posts so we can help evaluate your reasoning. Just saying you'd do X in a given hand, which you then always caveat by saying "but I'm a fish so it's probably wrong," doesn't really add any value.

tldr; let's limit the amount of shitposting given that these forums are already in dire straits.
Too long did read.

I'm not a net loser. Just can't get time & seats in LHE games 20/40+ which would only be worth my hourly IRL.

Will never do +1 anymore without adding info concisely.
Mink Coats Quote
09-05-2022 , 01:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ninefingershuffle
Why wouldn't I have AA here? More likely to cap flop? Yeah, I probably wait in this exact spot here with AA-QQ and cap my sets and AK/AQss/89ss type stuff.

I'd certainly call river with AA because KQ is part of their range here.

The more I think about it, the more I think this is a pretty easy fold with QQ no spade here. The SB's line of 3 bet/check/bet just screams draw that got there, and I have to contend with the player behind as well.

I remember the old fur coats post from years ago and generally abide by its maxims, but even in fairly large pots, I find that river bluffs are

becoming rarer and rarer.
60-120 Fur Coat Dilemma - Medium Stakes Poker Forum - Medium Stakes Limit Holdem
https://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/5...ilemma-241513/


Doesn't apply.

Players in the 20/40 half kill game or Mix game too terrible.

I'd showdown cheap as played.

You & Sheseasy are only players I'd consider winning players / opponents I wouldn't want to play HUHU.

OT: Took 5min on phone to find thread ninefingershuffle referring to.

Last edited by maka2184; 09-05-2022 at 01:47 PM. Reason: DonJuan #1 AINEC
Mink Coats Quote

      
m