Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
line check line check

11-20-2017 , 12:18 PM
H part of 100/200 7-game mix

tight good pro raises UTG, i call bb with 62

flop: T84
he bets i call

Turn: T842
he bets, i raise he calls

River: T842some meaningless blank
he checks, i bet

Thoughts on all streets appreciated. thx
line check Quote
11-20-2017 , 12:26 PM
How is he out of position if he raised utg and you called BB?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
line check Quote
11-20-2017 , 12:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by QUADT2
H part of 100/200 7-game mix

tight good pro raises UTG, i call bb with 6line check:2line check:

flop: Tline check:8line check:4line check:
he bets i call

Turn: Tline check:8line check:4line check:2line check:
he bets, i raise he calls

River: Tline check:8line check:4line check:2line check:some meaningless blank
he checks, i bet

Thoughts on all streets appreciated. thx
Fold pre. Defending any two suited cards has to be a small to medium losing play and not worth the variance IMO. Also more so against a solid pro raising UTG.

Any other reads on you or pro? I expect pro to call down with almost all pairs to look you up and most ace highs.
line check Quote
11-20-2017 , 01:35 PM
Xc turn. I like your play if the turn doesn’t pair you.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
line check Quote
11-20-2017 , 02:06 PM
Fold pre, call down turn. Bluffing this hand is dumb and you're more likely to get called by worse than fold better IMO.
line check Quote
11-20-2017 , 02:07 PM
Fold pre. Not close.

How can villain check river OOP. River card does matter.

Value betting pair of twos vs a good UTG range is bad.
line check Quote
11-20-2017 , 02:09 PM
Of note, game is 7 handed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
line check Quote
11-20-2017 , 02:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by blundy
How is he out of position if he raised utg and you called BB?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk


+1
line check Quote
11-20-2017 , 02:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheRail15
Of note, game is 7 handed.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes, but 62s isn't in my BB defend range in 6 max. So logically it's not going to be present here.
line check Quote
11-20-2017 , 02:35 PM
whats the bottom end of ur BB defend range in 6 max?
line check Quote
11-20-2017 , 02:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdr0317
Yes, but 62s isn't in my BB defend range in 6 max. So logically it's not going to be present here.


Fine but pre isn’t really that bad. Turn is much worse imo


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
line check Quote
11-20-2017 , 02:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OnTheRail15
Fine but pre isn’t really that bad. Turn is much worse imo


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Agreed.
line check Quote
11-20-2017 , 02:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by QUADT2
whats the bottom end of ur BB defend range in 6 max?
65s for my suited 6's. Maybe add 64s against certain UTG opens. 54s as well. 62s just doesn't flop smoothly enough for me to consider playing it here.
line check Quote
11-20-2017 , 04:42 PM
i used to play this pf if the utg raiser 7handed was loose enough but even so, it's just not a good enough hand to play hu oop even vs a slightly looser opponent. so def fold pre.

you had the plan to k/c then k/r before the turn came, right? if so, then you have to change your plan when you hit a pair. it's now better to check and call vs. trying to move him off of a hand. you'd only be folding out worse hands (high cards who tried to win w/ a 2nd bet and don't think they can call for their pair outs). those same hands may check behind if you k/c the turn, though some % of the time they'll bet and then it comes down to knowing what this person's tendencies are
line check Quote
11-20-2017 , 07:08 PM
I'm surprised no one has touched on a possible check raise line on this flop. This flop is good for the BB's range and we can certainly call a three bet. We'd also be check raising T's and 8's here to balance this semi bluff. I like a flop check / call more with our higher flush draws that have show down value. Are we worried we have too many c/r semi bluffs vs. c/r value on this type of flop or is it a scenario where folks prefer to flat their whole range?

I'm in the fold pre camp unless scotch has been flowing profusely, and also like a check call on the turn as played. We have some modicum of show down value with our pair.

J Lot
line check Quote
11-21-2017 , 11:38 PM
I'm alright with a x/c or x/f strategy on this flop v UTG raise. I'm also ok with a strategy that includes x/r'ing in which case I would certainly include this hand.

And what everyone else said. Fold pre. Treat it as a bluff catcher once you make the pair on the turn.
line check Quote
11-22-2017 , 08:32 AM
tight utg 7 handed has like no bluffs in his range on the river. c/c , c/c, c/f. or bet the river and hope to get called by ace high but you should proly run the numbers on if that makes sense first.

check calling river seems like a big mistake, but again, just run the numbers. shouldnt be hard as utg range is pretty tight here.
line check Quote
11-22-2017 , 04:25 PM
Victor: villain should have some big flush draw combos and some QJ combos at the least. I like check call 3 times just fine. Pre I defend any two suited here and flop is fairly interesting. I’m certain the bots would have a mixed strategy with flush draw combos but I think 6 high would generally just jam flop and barrel off.
line check Quote
11-22-2017 , 08:14 PM
Getting a river donk bet called by A-high seems very possible on this board depending on what the river card is.
line check Quote
11-22-2017 , 08:17 PM
My experience is that the river xc xc donk is a bluff practically never from tags or lag/tags so it doesn’t make much sense to employ the line except in special circumstances or to exploit specific villains.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
line check Quote
11-22-2017 , 11:10 PM
Turn check raise is bad. I hate turning made hands into bluffs.
line check Quote
11-28-2017 , 08:52 AM
This post raises so many questions.

Edit: But mostly how do I join this game.
line check Quote
11-29-2017 , 05:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathDonkey
Victor: villain should have some big flush draw combos and some QJ combos at the least. I like check call 3 times just fine. Pre I defend any two suited here and flop is fairly interesting. I’m certain the bots would have a mixed strategy with flush draw combos but I think 6 high would generally just jam flop and barrel off.
That is defending a lot of hands. Tight BTN-4 range is about 10-15%. Defending all suited hands, pairs, A2+, T+9+ is 50%. That's a big spread to overcome.

My experience is that a bot would play 62s and weakest flush draws very passively here. xc, xc, xf. At its most aggressive, xc xc donk river, since we don't block many draws.
line check Quote
11-29-2017 , 10:44 AM
The difference in amount of hands played is not relevant, look into the equities. In Omaha a guy might open 10% and it’s correct to defend Like 80% heads up. Depends on equities and pot odds.
line check Quote
11-29-2017 , 09:23 PM
FWIW DD is for sure going to play 62s more profitably than the average guy is. 62s may be a loser, but the people who frequently play it from the BB are demographically more likely to make horrific post flop mistakes with it as well (IOW, the break evenish nits wouldn't be caught dead with 62s defended against an utg open but the stationy and spewy fish will gladly play this hand).
line check Quote

      
m