Quote:
Originally Posted by Verona
Both parties claim to have evidence that supports their respective contentions, yet both parties refuse to show it.
Stop and think for a moment how incredibly stupid that is.
Is there a single post in this thread where anyone has claimed they have any evidence or data that shows AJo is not a winner UTG?
Also basically what ZOMG said. Most of it is on an old hard drive that may or may not still work. I'd have to get it from storage, get it to function correctly, then manually research and input 1000 different results for AJ to get s proper standard deviation to try and prove a result that I already know.
I spent a lot of time going over hands and my data and seeing which hands were profitable in what spots, knowing they would also be profitable live. I'm quite confident AJo was a winner (in the green) for me UTG 9 handed .
Maybe this fee info will be Useful to people or maybe it's worthless. You can choose to ignore it if you want or choose to call it statically insignificant, that's your pergogative. But the info I've laid out is about the max that I care about the subject,
Last edited by Jon_locke; 06-10-2016 at 10:39 PM.