Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Snyder
The thing about LHE is that anyone playing seriously at the 20/40+ level should have already invested what ought to represent <2% of their playing bankroll into purchasing the well known solver that exists. The information it provides someone willing to put in the work will far outweigh any forum discussion. Someone posted a hand in HSLHE in 2016 that generated a 1 month long discussion that contained what I felt was some questionable advice. For fun I just spent 5 minutes going through the hand on the solver including the time it took to generate the game tree to see how both players played their individual hands and got to see how both players should be playing their actual ranges. It's really that simple for the most part. At least when it comes to individual hands.
Naive question about solvers: In any 20/40 game I'd want to keep playing, people are making very visible mistakes--a few cold calling, open limping, etc. Many aren't but I'm in fewer pots against them.
I can see how solvers help against good players whom I'm going to see again and again. I don't want to play GTO there but it's a good starting point. Against bad or mediocre players, I'd be giving up way too much to play GTO and frankly think it might just be a distraction.
This would be even truer if I moved to where the 20 and above games are better, by which I mean California (and occasionally the Bellagio). But I still see many obvious mistakes in WA.
Am I misunderstanding the value of solvers? Do they go way beyond GTO?