Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
2018 NC/LC THREAD - are we ever going to get a title? 2018 NC/LC THREAD - are we ever going to get a title?

07-05-2018 , 05:20 PM
oh god, you said the trigger word, now all hell is going to break loose.
07-05-2018 , 05:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Snyder
The thing about LHE is that anyone playing seriously at the 20/40+ level should have already invested what ought to represent <2% of their playing bankroll into purchasing the well known solver that exists. The information it provides someone willing to put in the work will far outweigh any forum discussion. Someone posted a hand in HSLHE in 2016 that generated a 1 month long discussion that contained what I felt was some questionable advice. For fun I just spent 5 minutes going through the hand on the solver including the time it took to generate the game tree to see how both players played their individual hands and got to see how both players should be playing their actual ranges. It's really that simple for the most part. At least when it comes to individual hands.
Naive question about solvers: In any 20/40 game I'd want to keep playing, people are making very visible mistakes--a few cold calling, open limping, etc. Many aren't but I'm in fewer pots against them.

I can see how solvers help against good players whom I'm going to see again and again. I don't want to play GTO there but it's a good starting point. Against bad or mediocre players, I'd be giving up way too much to play GTO and frankly think it might just be a distraction.

This would be even truer if I moved to where the 20 and above games are better, by which I mean California (and occasionally the Bellagio). But I still see many obvious mistakes in WA.

Am I misunderstanding the value of solvers? Do they go way beyond GTO?
07-05-2018 , 05:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBadBabar
based on this, it seems like i have lots of cronies. and so do you! and rob too! we all do!
Yep, I do also have cronies; that word choice was not meant as an insult. But my cronies don't get special privileges in the forum.
07-05-2018 , 05:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chillrob
You're still posting strategy in other forums, just not in this one. I don't understand why, since the guy you have the beef with owns both forums, but it's certainly not because you're permanently banned, as BBB implied.

Really I don't care in general how many usernames someone has if they're not using it for nefarious purposes, but your first alternative name was a slight modification on the name of a poster believed to be a bad player, and your first posts with that account were offering to play poker with people for big money, hoping others would think you were the bad player. Maybe the whole thing was a put on, but it fooled a lot of people, including me for awhile, which I didn't care for. Then of course your new account name was created just to mock me, and you have insulted me using the account on this forum.

If you are finished posting strategy here, I certainly would prefer you just get out, as you certainly aren't adding anything worthwhile. Or you could go back to making strategy posts with so many typos and grammatical errors that they're near incoherent. Or you can continue to pout and lurk while reading posts by others and thinking to yourself how much smarter you are than anyone else. I don't really care at this point.

What I do care about now is moderators blaming the lack of strategy posts on a fear of being banned, when you were only banned for openly mocking strategy posts by Mason Malmuth, the owner of the forum. This all while some players are discouraged and asked not to post so many hand examples they want feedback on.
(1) it was quite the con. I challenged my friend to play HU LATB then texted him it was me. nefarious indeed
(2) i picked this username because i think you need to chill a little more.
(3) you keep talking about me mocking the site owners and thats an absurd position. They suggest you should check QQ 8 ways pre and I start a thread that asks if we should check QQ 8 ways pre. Rob- o my god jon is mocking people, Babar should ban him for that but obviously he won't for god knows what reasons, its clearly a bannable offense.
07-05-2018 , 05:39 PM
(1) Maybe that was your reasoning, but it fooled many people into thinking your new account was the same as the original one, resulting in unproductive confusion on the site.
(2) Whatevs
(3) You clearly mocked him, both with the thread you started and many other posts. Even if his strategy was poor, it was silly to think it was a good idea to launch an extended mockery of the site owner. Then you started mocking me for defending some of his strategy posts, so I complained to the moderators about it. It was not my doing to get your duplicate account banned, the site owner was upset by the disrespect and decided to take action about it.
(3a) BBB did give me a temp ban for mocking you, which I had not seen him do for anyone mocking anyone else before (obviously I am more likely to notice my own banning than that of others, but I don't think it was a common occurance).
07-05-2018 , 06:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AKQJ10
Naive question about solvers: In any 20/40 game I'd want to keep playing, people are making very visible mistakes--a few cold calling, open limping, etc. Many aren't but I'm in fewer pots against them.

I can see how solvers help against good players whom I'm going to see again and again. I don't want to play GTO there but it's a good starting point. Against bad or mediocre players, I'd be giving up way too much to play GTO and frankly think it might just be a distraction.

This would be even truer if I moved to where the 20 and above games are better, by which I mean California (and occasionally the Bellagio). But I still see many obvious mistakes in WA.

Am I misunderstanding the value of solvers? Do they go way beyond GTO?


The way I look at it is even bad players do confusing things and you end up in a spot where you aren’t sure what to do. You can either try to soul read the guy (which might be a fine idea) or you can have a “default” which you know is backed up by gto principles. If you choose the latter and have a bad session you can be comforted in knowing you just ran poorly that day. A lot of Poker is being able to know if the plays you made were actually correct and you ran poorly or they were bad plays and you deserved to lose. You get that wrong enough times and you are busto
07-05-2018 , 06:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathDonkey
The way I look at it is even bad players do confusing things and you end up in a spot where you aren’t sure what to do. You can either try to soul read the guy (which might be a fine idea) or you can have a “default” which you know is backed up by gto principles. If you choose the latter and have a bad session you can be comforted in knowing you just ran poorly that day. A lot of Poker is being able to know if the plays you made were actually correct and you ran poorly or they were bad plays and you deserved to lose. You get that wrong enough times and you are busto
FWIW, I had some discussions with Phil Newell on this subject when his book came out. He felt very strongly that even if you are going to be extremely exploitative in a given situation, it's still useful to know what the optimal play so you get the exploitative adjustment right.
07-05-2018 , 07:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chillrob
You're still posting strategy in other forums, just not in this one. I don't understand why, since the guy you have the beef with owns both forums, but it's certainly not because you're permanently banned, as BBB implied.

Really I don't care in general how many usernames someone has if they're not using it for nefarious purposes, but your first alternative name was a slight modification on the name of a poster believed to be a bad player, and your first posts with that account were offering to play poker with people for big money, hoping others would think you were the bad player. Maybe the whole thing was a put on, but it fooled a lot of people, including me for awhile, which I didn't care for. Then of course your new account name was created just to mock me, and you have insulted me using the account on this forum.

If you are finished posting strategy here, I certainly would prefer you just get out, as you certainly aren't adding anything worthwhile. Or you could go back to making strategy posts with so many typos and grammatical errors that they're near incoherent. Or you can continue to pout and lurk while reading posts by others and thinking to yourself how much smarter you are than anyone else. I don't really care at this point.

What I do care about now is moderators blaming the lack of strategy posts on a fear of being banned, when you were only banned for openly mocking strategy posts by Mason Malmuth, the owner of the forum. This all while some players are discouraged and asked not to post so many hand examples they want feedback on.
This is one of the saddest things I've seen on the internet today.
07-05-2018 , 08:07 PM
The forum is in a sad state. I'm trying to improve it by getting the problems out in the open instead of sweeping them under the rug. Everything I have said is accurate, and hasn't even been denied by the mods because they know it is correct.

Last edited by chillrob; 07-05-2018 at 08:21 PM.
07-05-2018 , 09:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chillrob
The forum is in a sad state. I'm trying to improve it by getting the problems out in the open instead of sweeping them under the rug. Everything I have said is accurate, and hasn't even been denied by the mods because they know it is correct.
Posting good advise strategy would probably do more to improve the forum than constantly crying about troll accounts that provide more content than you could possibly realize or the gramtical mistakes I make

Fwiw I know quite a few people that found the dead.money account amusing which is all I was ever going for.
07-05-2018 , 09:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob...Chill
Posting good advise strategy...
I regularly post the best advice I can, often expressing disagreement without mockery. Too bad you can't bring yourself to do the same since you staged your protest walkout.
07-05-2018 , 10:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chillrob
The forum is in a sad state. I'm trying to improve it by getting the problems out in the open instead of sweeping them under the rug. Everything I have said is accurate, and hasn't even been denied by the mods because they know it is correct.

Oh, no, almost everything you said is completely wrong. I just don't see much point in arguing. Neither of us is going to change the other person's mind, and I think you probably enjoy the process too much.
07-05-2018 , 10:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chillrob
Yep, I do also have cronies; that word choice was not meant as an insult. But my cronies don't get special privileges in the forum.
I want a LHE crony. Will someone be my crony?
07-05-2018 , 10:25 PM
I would settle for a cronut though.
07-05-2018 , 10:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AKQJ10
I want a LHE crony. Will someone be my crony?

Well, we have met before, so that means we're cronies!
07-05-2018 , 11:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBadBabar
Oh, no, almost everything you said is completely wrong. I just don't see much point in arguing. Neither of us is going to change the other person's mind, and I think you probably enjoy the process too much.
Calling me a liar in a roundabout way with no explanation or specific refutation.

Standard.
07-05-2018 , 11:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBadBabar
Well, we have met before, so that means we're cronies!
I think we met before as well. But I'm not special enough for the special rules to apply to me.
07-05-2018 , 11:28 PM
I don't want a cronie, I just want the money.
07-06-2018 , 12:03 AM
He said you were wrong not a liar. Those are not the same.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
07-06-2018 , 12:54 AM
Which is more likely to be true:

(A) This forum has lost steam because ***** ******* is an ******* and because of this one of the best limit hold'em players in the world got banned for disagreeing with him.

(B) Limit hold'em is in decline, and midstakes games are found in fewer and fewer places live and games are disappearing dramatically online, and the decline in the forum corresponds to this.

(***** ******* is an *******, but they have always been one, and people have been banned for butting heads with them since day one of these forums. But that didn't stop 2+2's dramatic growth, even before the poker boom, and in my opinion it isn't a significant factor now.)
07-06-2018 , 01:16 AM
Of course it is B. This isn't the only forum dying on 2p2. Season long sports threads are getting fewer and fewer posts each year. Casino specific threads get few posts. The podcast forum rarely gets more than 10 posts an episode.
07-06-2018 , 03:50 AM
Last week I told BBB and DougL they were welcome to ban me, but they didn't take me up on it. Am I going to lose my cronie badge?
07-06-2018 , 06:36 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chillrob
The forum is in a sad state. I'm trying to improve it by getting the problems out in the open instead of sweeping them under the rug. Everything I have said is accurate, and hasn't even been denied by the mods because they know it is correct.
You are not improving my experience.
07-06-2018 , 10:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlanBostick
Which is more likely to be true:

(A) This forum has lost steam because ***** ******* is an ******* and because of this one of the best limit hold'em players in the world got banned for disagreeing with him.

(B) Limit hold'em is in decline, and midstakes games are found in fewer and fewer places live and games are disappearing dramatically online, and the decline in the forum corresponds to this.

(***** ******* is an *******, but they have always been one, and people have been banned for butting heads with them since day one of these forums. But that didn't stop 2+2's dramatic growth, even before the poker boom, and in my opinion it isn't a significant factor now.)
The decline of limit holdem is certainly the main reason the forum has lost steam. However, I still think there are plenty of people who enjoy talking poker. The problem is it's a dominoe affect. If people log on and see new posts they will continue to log on. If the posts start to decline people become discouraged because there isn't anything new so they don't log on as much. People who do post don't get a lot of responses because people aren't expecting there to be new posts.

I don't know how the business of forums work. Maybe this forum isn't important. I would expect more participation by mods and administrators to help stimulate discussion.......DougL chimes in quite often and it's much appreciated. Mason also chimes in from time to time.

I'm just saying this forum could be active given the responses I have seen and the people I have talked to. It will never get back to the good old day's when you could post a hand and get 20 responses from 20 great players in the same day.

I hope this was an interesting take!

      
m