Quote:
Originally Posted by DeathDonkey
DonJuan: I admire your story as well. My one concern with your way of learning is such a reliance on solvers pushes you further and further down the “one trick pony” path. You aren’t becoming a better “poker” player you are becoming a better limit Holdem bot. This makes you great at your game, certainly even though I am a good Lhe player I am sure you would be favored both heads up and multiway. But what if 8super decides he likes a stud game, or Omaha?
Ah there probably some confusion I am actually going to be one of the best player adapt at the changing environment. People seem to be confuse by how poker really works for example alpha-1 defense doesn't work in a game like poker and that has already been explain by one of the solver creator. So old school thinking are with pot odd are quiet bad in poker. Also another thing I found out in real GTO there no such thing as bluffing your worst calling hand on riv that just another human sub optimal play which could be exploitative but that not gto. So with all this bad human thinking why would I trust in my own thinking and not reply on these machine to solve for me and I can always change the variable ex. rake/ or artificial bet size to see how it effect calling/folding most of the time this happen by accident but it help me discover new things.
One of the curse before was not switching games fast enough become one of the greatest gift for me. The Nl/Plo and poker climate has change so fast that top player 1-2 years ago are consider fish by the new comer look at what LLinusLLove/ Limitless vs OtB_RedBaron. This guys all are customize there solver. Stud etc is are pretty big game but all can be program to solve like plo/nl and has already been ask to solve the reason why it not being done? Well not market not big enough yet. What I am actually to get at is why not wait for when program get better at teaching us to get better and learn it cheaper while other are stuck in there old dog can't learn new trick problem when most of the exploitative play are sub optimal and solver actually has a Max exploitative strategy numbers but you are out of your mind if you think you can play that well before you even understand full gto first ?
I am not really worry about not being able to learn new format either because the way I study are base on this book.
https://www.amazon.com/Peak-Secrets-...ords=peak+book . Key words how you build up your mental representation and also deliberate practice.
And I customize the way I study that once I am done with head up/ 3 max lhe I am going to go straight to nl or plo. I want to add another thing overall there is no direct heuristics between huhu and bvb but that only because opening range are different and position. So you are force to "memorize" different structure. There are a bunch of heuristics that is similar with plo/nl/lhe though since flush/straight+combos blockers work the same.