Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeno
Somewhat, it is hard to decipher. Carlo is allowed to preach for his hero Rudolf Steiner, as I am allowed, as a poster, to give my opinion that I think it is mostly gibberish. It is also a bit off topic and he continually weasels this stuff into any thread he can. As the mod I have allowed it. I think I've been more than fair.
Nothing more to add. Discussion ended. If someone thinks they have been abused or for further discussion please PM the Mod, this refers to any forum by the way.
Carry on.......
Toothsayer complimented me on my copmposition but i had to make it clear that what I offered was and is from a series of lectures called "Human and Cosmic Thought" by you know who.
I have always tried to make clear any "REFERENCES" so as to not have any mistaken identity.
You've got my goat while using pejoratives like "vomit" and other epithets in previous threads not because you're a poster for I can well manage you and what you stand for but because of your position as the beer frolicker of science I am dispossesed.
I sought refuge from Mat in the past when you actually decided that "philosophy" was not germane to this forum. I've done it again this time but I do wish that you would give up your seat; you can still do what you do and hurl disparaging remarks to wit's end.
No, I do not proselytize, but the nature of the thought processes can be difficult but totally understandable even without background.
Its about honest referencing which I believe is one of the hallmarks of reasonable presenting of thoughts.
There is no issue with "gibberish" but your tone is one of an abject humanity to fellow and friends and I feel for you. You're offering a destructive slander which is not even seen in politics for at least they say something.
"As an explicitly spiritual movement, anthroposophy has sometimes been called a religious philosophy.[98] In 2005, a California federal court ruled that a group alleging that anthroposophy is a religion for Establishment Clause purposes did not provide any legally admissible evidence in support of this view; the case is under appeal. In 2000, a French court ruled that a government minister's description of anthroposophy as a cult was defamatory."[99]
As a finish, this is a wikipedia reference to you know what which can offer some light; this is in your reference to words like 'cult", "pseudoscience', et al... by the way, all that i have written in this thread is to present the various philosophical outlooks which are not 'cultus" but can be found in the evolution of the human "soul" of thoughts and thinking. Please read the entire wiki reference whether you like it or not.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthroposophy