I am trying to wrap my head around the narrative. It seems true that if everyone on earth was to self isolate for 2 weeks, the virus would die. Or the person carrying the virus would and thus the virus would die.
Of course, that isn't practical.
Social distancing can certainly decrease the Reproductive rate of the virus. Again, in theory, if the R nought is less than one it can't reproduce and will die out.
But how is it logical to lift social restrictions when the R nought is less than 1 and assume it is the correct move and that the Reproductive rate won't increase again.
I can't see how it wont, until a vaccine is produced and tried and tested.
And from a medical advisors pov to the politicians I would expect it but also be comfortable that instead of the feared surge we will instead have a yoyo effect, and the curve will become a series of waves that the healthcare system can handle.
Other questions include: will the same percentage of the populations get infected anyway and if so does that mean that social distancing was not the right move. Or the social distancing that we did until we didn't .
If a country had the hypothetical healthcare system that could care for anyone who entered into it, would social distancing be reasonable in any sense. Barring those who tend to mostly die from the disease.
Widespread testing of course would answer most of these questions.
Other questions include: will the same percentage of the populations get infected anyway and if so does that mean that social distancing was not the right move. Or the social distancing that we did until we didn't .
If a country had the hypothetical healthcare system that could care for anyone who entered into it, would social distancing be reasonable in any sense. Barring those who tend to mostly die from the disease.
Widespread testing of course would answer most of these questions.
Only so many sardines can fit in a can. Waiting lists don't work well for the very ill.
Three thousand brass plates, the acts of the senate and people, were deposited in the Capitol; and some of the acts, as the Julian law against extortion, surpassed the number of a hundred chapters. The Decemivrs* had neglected to import the sanction of Zaleucus**, which so long maintained the integrity of his republic. A Locrian who proposed any new law [or an alteration of an existing one] stood forth in the assembly of the people with a cord round his neck, and if the law was rejected the innovator was instantly straggled. [My comment] -Edward Gibbon, The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire.
*A member of a permanent board or a special commission of ten members in ancient Rome, especially the commission that drew up Rome's first code of law. a member of any council or ruling body of ten.
** Codified Locrian Law
#######
Been rereading Gibbon - Much more worthwhile and up to date than any current newspaper, magazine, or internet babbling and frivolity.
Was the law against extortion so long so it could cover all the cases or all the exceptions?
PairTheBoard
I do not know the particulars but perhaps extortion was a very profitable crime and used by "eveyone' so all possible cases were covered by the code. Exceptions would, I will guess, be made in court on a case by case basis. But I could be wrong. I'm not that knowledgeable on old Roman Jurisprudence or their court system. But the above does seem a probable conjecture.
The same virus returned the following years: a year later, in late 1969 and early 1970, and in 1972. The total worldwide death toll is estimated to have been in the region of one million people.
*********************
Current worldwide death toll (today) is ~170,000 for COVID-19.
Projections................?
Last edited by Zeno; 04-22-2020 at 06:03 PM.
Reason: Typo
I wonder what percentage of people who thought they were doing important things are now sitting at home because they have been deemed inessential.
I wonder what percentage of those people are cognizant that they are not needed.
One percent; leaving 99% in the cesspool of confirmation bias and turmoil of thinking that the world can't get along without THEM.
Remains me of this: in the mid-1980s I was working for the US Government and Reagan shut the government down over spending bill(s) etc. Anyway, a fax came to the office and all non-essential personal were dismissed. I was included. In fact almost everyone was included, expect a few Technicians that needed to monitor and keep essential equipment functioning properly. And the Janitor. The rest of us went to a bar and started drinking beer. What was amusing is that one of the "essential people" went with us; so we made him buy a round for eveyone. That was deemed essential. If I recall this correctly the shutdown only last a day or two. But it was an excellent way to deflate the ego.